Downstream Economic Benefits from Storm-Water Management
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130, Issue 6
Abstract
Using benefits transfer methods, this paper assesses the downstream economic consequences of development designs that promote greater on-site water retention. It concludes that on-site retention provides many services that are conceptually distinct but empirically intertwined. Flood mitigation and water quality protection are the most important of these services. For residential properties, the economic value of those services is on the order of 0–5% of market value depending on the difference that retention makes to downstream flood exposure. For water quality improvements, the increases range up to 15% of market value for waterside residences where clarity of the water quality is greatly improved. The increases are much less for improvements that are less visible, properties that are not developed, and properties not adjacent to the watercourse. Our best estimate of total benefits to property owners is 2–5% of property value on average for all properties in the flood plain. The public sector realizes additional benefits through smaller bridges, culverts, and other drainage infrastructure and through increased aquifer recharge. Cities and industries may avoid costly upgrades to waste water treatment facilities if low flows increase. It is difficult to generalize about the economic value of the latter effects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Rivers, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and Smart Growth America. ( 2002). Paving our way to water shortages: How sprawl aggravates drought, Washington, D.C.
2.
Arendt, R.G. (1996). Conservation design for subdivisions: A practical guide to creating open space networks, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
3.
Arnold, C. L., Jr., and Gibbons, C. J. (1996). “Impervious surface coverage.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 62(2), 243–258.
4.
, J. B. Braden, and, C. D. Kolstad, eds. (1991). Measuring the demand for environmental quality, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5.
Brox, J. A., Kumar, R. C., and Stollery, K. R. (2003). “Estimating willingness to pay for improved water quality in the presence of item nonresponse bias.” Am. J. Agric. Econom., 85(2), 414–428.
6.
Carson, R. T., and Mitchell, R. C. (1993). “The value of clean water: The public’s willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable water quality.” Water Resour. Res., 29, 2445–2453.
7.
Center for Transportation Research and Education. ( 2003). Iowa statewide urban design standards manual, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 〈http://www.iowasudas.org/design.cfm〉 (Aug. 8, 2003).
8.
Center for Watershed Protection. ( 1998). Better site design: A handbook for changing development rules in your community, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD.
9.
Chivers, J. (2001). “Flood risk, property values, and information market failure.” MS thesis, Department of Economics, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
10.
Chivers, J., and Flores, N. E. (2002). “Market failure in information: The National Flood Insurance Program.” Land Econ., 78(4), 515–521.
11.
Clark, E.H., Haverkamp, J.A., and Chapman, D. (1985). Eroding Soils: The Off-farm Impacts, The Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.
12.
Crosson, P.R. (1983). Productivity effects of cropland erosion in the United States, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.
13.
Doss, C., and Taff, S. (1996). “The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values.” J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 21(1), 120–129.
14.
Earnhart, D. (2001). “Combining revealed and state preference methods to value environmental amenities at residential locations.” Land Econ., 77(1), 12–29.
57.
Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). (2003).
15.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1985). Hydraulic design of highway culverts, Rep. No. FHWA-IP-85-15, Hydraulic Design Series No. 5, FHWA, Washington, D.C.
16.
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration. ( 2000). National Flood Insurance Program, Statistics by Fiscal Year, Washington, D.C. 〈http://www.fema.gov/nfip/statsfisc.htm〉 (Dec. 12, 2002).
17.
Freeman, A.M. III. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values, 2nd Ed. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
18.
Get a Quote.Net (2003). CD Estimator-Heavy Illinois 〈http://www.get-a-quote.net〉 (Sept. 2, 2003).
19.
Hager, M. C. (2003). “Low-impact development: Lot-level approaches to stormwater management are gaining ground.” Stormwater, 4(1), 12–25.
20.
Heaney, J. P., Sample, D., and Wright, L. (2002). “Costs of stormwater control.” EPA 600-R-02-021, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
21.
Hoehn, J. P., and Randall, A. (1989). “Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test.” Am. Econ. Rev., 79(3), 544–551.
22.
Holoway, J. M., and Burby, R. (1990). “The effects of floodplain development controls on residential land values.” Land Econ., 66(3), 259–270.
55.
Joint Task Force of the Water Environment Federation and American Society of Civil Engineers. ( 1998). Urban runoff quality management, WEF Manual of Practice No. 23 and ASCE Manual and Report on Engineering Practice No. 87, ASCE, Reston, Va.
23.
Jordan, J. L., and Elnagheeb, A. H. (1993). “Willingness to pay for improvements in drinking water quality.” Water Resour. Res., 29(2), 237–246.
24.
Kalman, O., Lund, J. R., Lew, D. K., and Larson, D. M. (2000). “Benefit-cost analysis of stormwater quality improvements.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 26(6), 615–628.
25.
Leggett, C. G., and Bockstael, N. E. (2000). “Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage, 39(2), 121–144.
26.
Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., and Covich, A. (2000). “Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey.” Ecologic. Econ., 33(1), 103–117.
27.
Michael, H.J., Boyle, K.J., and Bouchard, R. (1996). “Water quality affects property prices: A case study of selected Maine lakes.” Misc. Rep. No. 398 Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, Orono, ME.
28.
National Research Council (NRC). (1997). Valuing groundwater: Economic concepts and approaches, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
29.
National Resources Defense Council. ( 1999). “Stormwater strategies: Community responses to runoff pollution.” New York 〈www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/storm/chap11.asp〉 (Aug. 8, 2002).
30.
Novotny, V., and Chesters, G. (1989). “Delivery of sediment and pollutants from nonpoint sources: A water quality perspective.” J. Soil Water Conservat., 44(1), 568–576.
31.
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO). (2002). “OFHEO house Price indexes: 2002 Q4, State-level indexes: North Carolina.” Washington, D.C. 〈http://www.ofheo.gov/house/hphisframe.html〉 (March 28, 2003).
32.
Palmquist, R.B. (1991). “Hedonic methods.” Measuring the demand for environmental quality, J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad, eds. North–Holland, Amsterdam, 77–120.
33.
Paterson, R. G. et al. (1993). “Costs and benefits of urban erosion and sediment control: The North Carolina experience.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 17(2), 167–178.
34.
Postel, S., and Richter, B. 2003. Rivers for life: Managing water for people and nature, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
35.
Sample, D. J. et al. (2003). “Costs of best management practices and associated land for urban stormwater control.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 129(1), 59–68.
36.
Schueler, T. R. (1987). Controlling urban runoff: A practical manual for planning and designing urban BMPs, Washington Metropolitan Water Resources Planning Board, Washington, D.C.
37.
Schueler, T.R. (1994). “The importance of imperviousness.” Watershed Protec. Techniques, 1(3), 100–111.
38.
Schueler, T. R. (1995). Site planning for urban stream protection, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, D.C.
39.
Schueler, T. R. (2003). “Ideal urban forms to minimize land-use impacts on aquatic ecosystems in the Great Lakes Basin.” prepared for Great Lakes Science Advisory Board (GLSAB) Workshop on Urban Land-use Impacts on Great Lakes Water Quality, GLSAB, Toronto.
40.
Statistics Canada. ( 1996). 1996 Census: Nation tables. Ottawa, 〈http://www.statcan.ca/english/census96/may12/t5can.htm〉 (Aug. 8, 2003).
41.
Steinnes, D.N. (1992). “Measuring the economic value of water quality: The case of lakeshore land.” Ann. Region. Sci., 26, 171–176.
42.
Streiner, C. F., and Loomis, J. B. (1995). “Estimating the benefits of urban stream restoration using the hedonic price method.” River, 5(4), 267–278.
43.
Thunberg, E., and Shabman, L. (1991). “Determinants of landowner’s willingness to pay for flood hazard reduction.” Water Resour. Bull., 27(4), 657–665.
44.
Thurston, H. W., Goddard, H. C., Szlag, D., and Lemberg, B. (2003). “Controlling stormwater runoff with tradable allowances for impervious surfaces.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 129(5), 409–418.
45.
Tobin, G. A., and Montz, B. E. (1994). “The flood hazard and dynamics of the residential land market.” Water Resour. Bull., 30(4), 673–685.
46.
Tobin, G.A., and Montz, B.E. (1997). “The impacts of a second catastrophic flood on property values in Linda and Olivehurst, California.” Natural Hazards Research and Applications Center, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
47.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. ( 1994). “The Great Flood of 1993 Post-Flood Report: Upper Mississippi River and Lower Missouri River Basins.” Northcentral Division, St. Paul, Minn.
48.
U.S. Census Bureau. ( 2001). Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2001, Washington, D.C.
49.
U.S. Census Bureau. ( 2002). “Historical income tables”, Table H-9 〈www.census.gov/hhes/income/histinc/h09.html〉 (Feb. 13, 2003).
50.
U.S. Department of Labor. ( 2003). “Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers—(CPI-U), U.S. city average.” Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C. 〈ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt〉 (Sept. 2, 2003).
51.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1990). “NPDES system.” 55 Federal Register, 48,602 USEPA, Washington, D.C.
52.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1993). Costs of providing government services to alternative residential patterns, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Microfiche.
53.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1999a). “Chap 6: Costs and benefits of stormwater BMPs.” Preliminary data summary of urban stormwater best management practices, Washington, D.C., EPA-821-R-99-012, 〈www.epa.gov/OST/stormwater/〉 (Aug. 19, 2002).
54.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1999b). “Stormwater phase II final rule.” 64 Federal Register, 68,722, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
56.
Wilson, A. et al. (1998). Green development: Integrating ecology and real estate, Wiley, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130 • Issue 6 • November 2004
Pages: 498 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.