Implications of Applying Statistically Based Procedures for Water Quality Assessment
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 129, Issue 4
Abstract
Assessment of water quality conditions as required by Section 303d of the Clean Water Act must rely on limited monitoring data. Because data are limited there will always be the potential for error when deciding if water quality standards are being met. However, the informed use of statistical procedures makes it possible to describe and manage these errors. We make the case for using such procedures in water quality assessment and draw the implications for the monitoring data for water quality standard setting, arguing that standard setting must accommodate the limits of the monitoring data and the statistical procedures that will be used for water quality assessment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Barnett, V., and Brown, M.(2002). “Best linear unbiased quantile estimators for environmental standards.” Environmentrics, 13, 295–310.
Barnett, V. and O’Hagan, T. (1997). Setting environmental standards: The statistical approach to handling uncertainty and variation, Chapman and Hall, London.
Gilbert, R. O. (1987). Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Great Lakes Environmental Center (GLEC). (2002). “National symposium: Designating attainable uses for the nation’s waters.” 27, 〈http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/standards/symposium/proceedings.pdf〉 (August 23, 2002).
Lieberman, G. J., and Resnikoff, G. J.(1955). “Sampling plans for inspection by variables.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 50, 457–516.
Lin, P., Meeter, D., and Niu, X. (2000). “A nonparametric procedure for listing and delisting impaired waters based on criterion exceedances.” Technical Rep., submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Fla., October.
McBride, G. B., and Ellis, J. C.(2001). “Confidence of compliance: A Bayesian approach for percentile standards.” Water Res., 35, 1117–1124.
National Research Council. (2001). Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management, National Academy Press.
Peterman, R.(1990). “Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management.” Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 47, 2–15.
Smith, E. P., Ye, K., Hughes, C., and Shabman, L.(2001). “Statistical assessment of violations of water quality standards under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 606–612.
Smith, E. P., Zahran, A., Mahmoud, M., and Ye, K. (2003). “Evaluation of water quality using acceptance sampling by variables.” Environmetrics, in press.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2000). “Guidance for the data quality objectives process. EPA QA/G-4, Office of Environmental Information, EPA/600/R-96/055, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. (2002). “Consolidated assessment and listing methodology—Toward a compendium of best practices.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/calm.html〉 (August 23, 2002).
Warn, A. E. (1999). “Better late than never? Injecting statistical know-how into legislation on water quality.” Environmental Statistics: Analyzing Data for Environmental Policy, Novartis Foundation Symposium, 220, 158–177.
Younos, T., and Walker, J. L. (2002). “Evaluation of biological assessment data and protocols for TMDL reports.” Universities’ contribution to TMDL program development, Water Resources Update, the Universities Council on Water Resources, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, Ill., No. 122, 47–54.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 The American Physical Society.
History
Received: Aug 28, 2002
Accepted: Oct 9, 2002
Published online: Jun 13, 2003
Published in print: Jul 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.