Interplay of Science and Stakeholder Values in Neuse River Total Maximum Daily Load Process
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 129, Issue 4
Abstract
Successful engagement of stakeholders and scientists is essential when regulatory agencies want public input to environmental policy decisions that are technically complex. Standards of good practice for public involvement in regulatory decision making derived from the literature were used to evaluate stakeholder interactions with water quality models and modelers in the Neuse River total maximum daily load (TMDL) process. Some aspects of this interaction went well: stakeholders were involved early in the development of at least some of the models; presentations from modelers enhanced stakeholders’ scientific knowledge; and the regulatory agencies accepted stakeholder input as having a strong advisory role in their decisions. Some elements did not go so well: delays in delivery of modeling results prevented their full consideration by stakeholders; and incompatible timeframes for data collection, modeling, and regulatory decision making diminished confidence in the integrated modeling and monitoring framework that had been developed for the Neuse. Most importantly, the TMDL regulatory process was defined much too narrowly to encompass the stakeholders’ wide-ranging concerns for equity, cost effectiveness, and deliberate adjudication of the tradeoffs between costs and benefits of water quality regulation. Water quality monitoring and modeling emphasizing concentrations of chlorophyll did not begin to address the social, economic, and cultural concerns of the stakeholders. The most serious shortcomings of the Neuse TMDL process thus rest not with the scientists or the stakeholders, but with the too narrow structure of the regulatory process itself.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arvai, J. L., Gregory, R., and McDaniels, T. L.(2001). “Testing a structured decision approach: Value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication.” Risk Anal., 21, 1065–1076.
Borsuk, M., Clemen, R., Maguire, L., and Reckhow, K.(2001). “Stakeholder values and scientific modeling in the Neuse River watershed.” Group Dec. Negot., 10, 355–373.
Borsuk, M. E., Reckhow, K. H., and Stow, C. A. (2003). “An integrated approach to TMDL development for the Neuse River estuary using a Bayesian probability network model (Neu-BERN).” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., in press.
Bowen, J., and Hieronymus, J. (2003). “A CE-qual-W2 model of the Neuse Estuary for TMDL development.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., in press.
Fisher, W., Patton, B., and Ury, R. (1991). Getting to yes, 2nd Ed., Penguin, New York.
Grayson, R. B., Doolan, J. M., and Blake, T.(1994). “Application of AEAM (adaptive environmental assessment and management) to water quality in the Latrobe River catchment.” J. Environ. Manage., 41, 245–258.
Gregory, R., Fields, D., and McDaniels, T.(2001). “Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions.” J. Policy Anal. Manage., 20, 415–432.
Gregory, R., and Wellman, K.(2001). “Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: A community-based estuary case study.” Ecologic. Econ., 39, 37–52.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Korfmacher, K. S.(1998). “Water quality modeling for environmental management: Lessons from the policy sciences.” Policy Sci., 31, 35–54.
Maguire, L. A., and Boiney, L. G.(1994). “Resolving environmental disputes: A framework incorporating decision analysis and dispute resolution techniques.” J. Environ. Manage., 42, 31–48.
Maguire, L. A., and Sondak, H. (1998). “Can using decision analysis and dispute resolution techniques to solve environmental problems help promote equity?” Statistics in ecology and environmental monitoring 2: Risk assessment and decision making in biology, D. J. Fletcher, L. Kavalieris, and B. F. J. Manly, eds., Otago University Press, Dunedin, New Zealand, 97–120.
Maloney, K. A., Maguire, L. A., and Lind, E. A. (2000). “Neuse river estuary modeling and monitoring project stage 1: Assessment of stakeholder interests and concerns to inform long-term modeling.” North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, Rep. No. 325-G, Raleigh, N.C.
McMahon, G., Alexander, R., and Qian, S. (2003). “Support of TMDL programs using spatially referenced regression models.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., in press.
Ozawa, C. P.(1993). “Improving citizen participation in environmental decisionmaking: The use of transformative mediator techniques.” Environ. Plann. C: Govern. Pol., 11, 103–117.
Ozawa, C. P.(1996). “Science in environmental conflicts.” Sociol. Perspec., 39, 219–230.
Ozawa, C. P., and Susskind, L.(1985). “Mediating science-intensive policy disputes.” J. Policy Anal. Manage., 5, 23–39.
Reckhow, K. H.(1994). “Water quality simulation modeling and uncertainty analysis for risk assessment and decision making.” Ecologic. Model., 72, 1–20.
Reckhow, K. H., and Gray, J. (2000). “Neuse River Estuary modeling and monitoring project stage 1: Stage 1 executive summary and long-term modeling recommendations.” Univ. of North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, Rep. No. 325-A, Raleigh, N.C.
Reitsma, R., Zigurs, I., Lewis, C., Wilson, V., and Sloane, A.(1996). “Experiment with simulation models in water-resources negotiations.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 122(1), 64–70.
Schwabe, K. T. (1996). “Source heterogeneity, resource characteristics, and the performance of marketable permits.” PhD dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
Stow, C. A., and Borsuk, M. E. (2003). “Assessing TMDL effectiveness using flow-adjusted concentrations: A case study of the Neuse River, North Carolina.” Environ. Sci. Technol., in press.
Stow, C. A., Roessler, C., Borsuk, M. E., and Reckhow, K. H. (2003). “A comparison of estuarine water quality models for TMDL development in the Neuse River Estuary.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., in press.
Wool, T., and Davie, S. (2003). “An EFDC WASP model of the Neuse Estuary for TMDL development.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., in press.
Wossink, A. (2000). The economics of BMPs to control nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin, Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 22, 2002
Accepted: Jan 17, 2003
Published online: Jun 13, 2003
Published in print: Jul 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.