Impact of Spring 2000 Drought Forecasts on Midwestern Water Management
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 129, Issue 1
Abstract
In March 2000, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued forecasts of spring and summer droughts for five Midwestern states. Summer brought heavy rains across the Midwest, ending the drought and revealing the forecast’s failure. The uses of forecasts and the resulting impacts were assessed by interviewing 45 state agency water managers in the drought region plus managers of 31 community water systems facing serious shortages. All state water managers had received the forecasts and most believed the forecast was accurate. As a result of the forecast, 70% of them initiated various activities, primarily by warning managers of water short communities and initiating meetings of state drought response groups. Many managers of water-short local systems reported that the forecast led them to impose water use restrictions or to seek new sources of water. Most state water officials and local managers felt the forecast-based actions were beneficial and created few problems. State climatologists handled many complaints, primarily from agricultural interests who claimed large losses resulting from use of the forecast. The forecast failure led to a loss of credibility over future use of climate forecasts by water managers. Long-range weather forecasts issued without expressing levels of uncertainty are misleading.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Changnon, S. A., and Vonnahme, D. R.(1986). “Use of climate predictions to decide a water management problem.” Water Resour. Bull., 22, 649–652.
Changnon, D. (2000). “Who used and benefitted from the El Niño forecasts?” El Niño 1997–1998, the climate event of the century, S. Changnon, ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 109–135.
Glantz, M. H.(1982). “Consequences and responsibilities in drought forecasting: the case of Yakima, 1977.” Water Resour. Res., 18, 3–13.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) Constituent Affairs Office. (2000a). “NOAA researchers announce drought conditions.” 〈[email protected]〉 (March 17, 2000).
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) Constituent Affairs Office. (2000b). “NOAA weather services forecasts drought conditions.” 〈[email protected]〉 (May 17, 2000).
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association/U. S. Department of Agriculture (NOAA/USDA) Joint Agricultural Weather Facility. (2000). Crop moisture—July 1, 2000, Washington, D.C.
Panel on Human Dimensions of Seasonal-to-Annual Climate Variability. (1999). Making climate forecasts matter, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Pielke, Jr., R. A.(1999). “Forecasts and responsibilities in the 1997 Red River flood.” Applied Behavioral Science Review, 7, 83–106.
Pielke, R. A., Jr. (2000). “Policy responses to El Niño 1997-1998: implications for forecast value and the future of climate services.” El Niño 1997–1998: climate event of the century, S. Changnon, ed., Oxford, University Press, New York, 172–196.
Pulwarty, R. S., and Redmond, K. T.(1997). “Climate and salmon restoration in the Columbia River basin: the role and usability of seasonal forecasts.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 381–397.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and National Drought Mitigation Center. (2000). Drought monitor for June 13, 2000, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 28, 2001
Accepted: Jan 18, 2002
Published online: Dec 13, 2002
Published in print: Jan 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.