TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 2002

Economic Value of Long-Lead Streamflow Forecasts for Columbia River Hydropower

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 128, Issue 2

Abstract

Recent advances in long-lead climate forecasting have made it possible to produce useful streamflow forecasts for the Columbia River basin roughly six months earlier than current forecasts that rely on snowpack measurements. The resulting increase in forecast lead time facilitates considerable improvements in system operating performance, especially in years of expected above average flows. In the current reservoir operating system, the so called “critical” and “assured refill” rule curves that restrict releases for hydropower generation in the period from August to December are based on the critical (most severe low flow) and third lowest flow sequences of record, respectively. These rule curves provide appropriate protection of energy capacity and reservoir refill in extreme low flow conditions, but are restrictive in normal and high flow years until midwinter when operational streamflow forecasts based on observed snowpack become available, and the climatological constraints are relaxed to account for expected summer streamflows. The use of long lead time streamflow forecasts allows current operating constraints to be relaxed in years when there is a high likelihood of ample streamflow. In these years, more spot market energy sales can be made in the late summer and fall/early winter because of increased available water for releases, and spill from reservoirs in wet years is also reduced. Reservoir model simulations using alternative reservoir rule curves based upon retrospective long-lead streamflow forecasts from water years 1931 to 1987 show that the proposed alternative operating system based on climate forecasts can increase nonfirm energy production from the major Columbia River hydropower dams by as much as 5.5 million MW/h/year, resulting in an average increase in annual revenue of approximately $153 million per year in comparison with the status quo. Other uses of the Columbia River are largely unaffected by the proposed changes in the operating system. In particular, firm energy, the reliability of storage reservoir refill, and the frequency of meeting of streamflow targets for salmon protection would be essentially unchanged in comparison with the status quo. The increased hydropower revenue is therefore directly attributed to use of long-lead forecast information and does not represent a trade-off among other management objectives.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Barnston, A. G.et al. (1994). “Long-lead seasonal forecasts—where do we stand?” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 75, 2097–2114.
Battisti, D. S., and Sarachik, E.(1995). “Understanding and predicting ENSO,” Rev. Geophys., 33, 1367–1376.
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). (1991). “The Columbia River system: The inside story,” Rep. DOE/BP-1689 published for the Columbia River System Review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation.
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). (1994). “Daily/hourly hydrosystem operation, how the Columbia River system responds to short term needs,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation.
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). (1999). “1999 Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Tudy”, Summary report published by the Bonneville Power Administration, December.
Dettinger, M. D., Cayan, D. R., Diaz, H. F., Meko, and D. M.(1998). “North-south precipitation patterns in western North America on interannual-to-decadal timescales,” J. Clim., 11(12), 3095–3111.
Gershunov, A., and Barnett, T. P.(1998). “Interdecadal modulation of ENSO teleconnections,” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79(12), 2715–2725.
Hamlet, A. F., and Lettenmaier, D. P.(1999a). “Columbia River streamflow forecasting based on ENSO and PDO climate signals,” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 125(6), 333–341.
Hamlet, A. F., and Lettenmaier, D. P.(1999b). “Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Columbia River Basin,” J. AWRA,35(6), 1597–1623.
Karier, T. (2000). “Electricity markets blow a fuse,” Seattle Times.
Koch, R. W., and Buller, D. (1993). “Forecasting seasonal streamflow: Columbia River at The Dalles,” Report to Bonneville Power Administration.
Latif, M.et al. (1994). “A review of ENSO prediction studies,” Clim. Dyn., 9, 167–179.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Garen, D. C. (1979). “Evaluation of streamflow forecasting methods,” Proc., Western Snow Conf., Sparks, Nev. 48–55.
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.(1994). “A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models,” J. Geophys. Res.,99(D7), 14415–14428.
Mantua, N. J., and Hare, S. R.(2000). “Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shifts in 1977 and 1989,” Prog. Oceanogr., 47(20), 103–145.
Mantua, N., Hare, S., Zhang, Y., Wallace, J. M., and Francis, R.(1997). “A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production,” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 1069–1079.
Matheussen, B., Kirschbaum, R. L., Goodman, I. A., O’Donnell, G. M., and Lettenmaier, D. P.(2000). “Effects of land cover change on streamflow in the interior Columbia River Basin,” Hydrolog. Process., 14(5), 867–885.
McPhaden, M. J.et al. (1998). “The tropical ocean-global atmosphere observing system: A decade of progress,” J. Geophys. Res., 103(7), 14169–14240.
Nijssen, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liang, X., Wetzel, S. W., and Wood, E. F.(1997). “Streamflow simulation for continental-scale river basins,” Water Resour. Res., 33(4), 711.
Piechota, T. C., and Dracup, J. A.(1996). “Drought and regional hydrologic variations in the United States: Associations with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation,” Water Resour. Res., 32(5), 1359–1373.
Piechota, T. C., Dracup, and J. A., Fovell, R. G.(1997). “Western U.S. streamflow and atmospheric circulation patterns during El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO),” J. Hydrol., 201(1–4), 249–271.
Trenberth, K. E.(1997). “The definition of El Niño,” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2771–2777.
Yeh, W. W. G., Becker, L., and Zettlemoyer, R.(1982). “Worth of inflow forecast for reservoir operation,” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 108(3), 257–269.
Zhang, Y., Wallace, J. M., and Battisti, D. S.(1997). “ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900–93,” J. Clim., 10, 1004–1020.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 128Issue 2March 2002
Pages: 91 - 101

History

Received: Oct 18, 2000
Accepted: May 22, 2001
Published online: Mar 1, 2002
Published in print: Mar 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alan F. Hamlet
Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195.
Daniel Huppert
Professor of Marine Affairs, Univ. of Washington.
Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share