Contingent Valuation of Some Externalities from Mine Dewatering
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 127, Issue 6
Abstract
We assess the economic impacts of some externalities from mine dewatering using the discrete choice version of the contingent valuation method. “Dewatering” refers to the pumping of ground water from areas surrounding mines. Our focus is on the dewatering being conducted by the large open-pit gold mines located in the Humboldt River basin of northern Nevada and its downstream impacts. Results indicate that in the short term the mines have created a positive externality for downstream parties. In the long term downstream impacts may be negative, but upstream “pit lakes” will be created that may have some value to users, depending on the lakes' quality.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Leamer, E., Portney, P., Radner, R., and Schuman, H. ( 1993). “Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation.” Fed. Register 58, Appendix I, 4602–4613.
2.
Barrick Goldstrike, Lone Tree Mine and Santa Fe Gold Corporation. (1998). Discharge monitoring reports on file at Bureau of Water Pollution Control, Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, Carson City, Nev.
3.
Berrens, R., Gandertonv, P., and Silva, C. ( 1996). “Valuing the protection of minimum instream flows in New Mexico.” J. Agric. Res. Economics, 21(2), 294–308.
4.
Bohara, A. K., McKee, M., Berrens, R., Smith, H. J., Silva, C. L., and Brookshire, D. S. ( 1998). “Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: Open ended vs. dichotomous choice.” J. Envir. Economic Mgmt., 35(2), 142–163.
5.
Cameron, T. A. ( 1988). “A new paradigm for valuing nonmarket goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression.” J. Envir. Economic Mgmt., 15(3), 355–379.
6.
Cameron, T. A., and Quiggin, J. ( 1994). “Estimation using contingent valuation data from `Dichotomous choice with follow-up' questionnaire.” J. Envir. Economic Mgmt., 27(3), 218–234.
7.
Carson, R. T., Flores, N. F., Martin, K. M., and Wright, J. L. ( 1996). “Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: Comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods.” Land Economics, 72(1), 80–99.
8.
Colby, B. ( 1988). “Economic impacts of water law—State law and water market development in the Southwest.” Nat. Res. J., 28(4), 721–749.
9.
Cooper, J. C. ( 1997). “Combining actual and contingent behavior data to model farmer adoption of water quality protection practices.” J. Agric. Res. Economics, 22(1), 30–43.
10.
De Young, C. ( 1997). “A statistical analysis of the double-bounded contingent valuation method: A comparison of two surveys.” MS thesis, Coll. of Agr. and Forestry, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
11.
Douglas, A. J., and Johnson, R. ( 1993). “Instream flow assessment and economic valuation: A survey of nonmarket benefits research.” Int. J. Envir. Studies, 43, 89–104.
12.
Douglas, A. J., and Taylor, J. G. ( 1999). “Nonmarket valuation research.” Int. J. Envir. Studies, in press.
13.
Hanemann, W. M. ( 1984). “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses.” Am. Agric. Economics Assoc., 15, 332–341.
14.
Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B. ( 1991). “Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation.” Am. J. Agric. Economics, 73(4), 1255–1263.
15.
Herriges, J. ( 1999). “Measuring goodness of fit for the double-bounded logit model: Comment.” Am. J. Agric. Economics, 81(1), 231–234.
16.
Reno Gazette J., Tuesday, June 17.
17.
Huszar, E. ( 1999). “Economic values of mine dewatering in northern Nevada.” MS thesis, Dept. of Appl. Economics and Statistics, University of Nevada, Reno.
18.
Huszar, E., Shaw, W. D., Englin, J., and Netusil, N. ( 1999). “Recreational damages from reservoir level changes.” Water Resour. Res., 35(11), 3489–3494.
19.
Kahneman, D., and Knetsch, J. L. ( 1992). “Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction.” J. Envir. Economic Mgmt., 22(1), 57–70.
20.
Kanninen, B. J., and Khawaja, M. S. ( 1995). “Measuring goodness of fit for the double-bounded logit model.” Am. J. Agric. Economics, 77(4), 885–890.
21.
Krinsky, I., and Robb, A. ( 1986). “Approximating the statistical properties of elasticities.” Rev. of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715–719.
22.
Lambert, D., and Shaw, W. D. ( 2000). “Agricultural and recreational impacts from surface flow changes due to gold mining operations in Nevada.” J. Agric. and Resour. Economics, 25(2), 533–546.
23.
Loomis, J. B. ( 1987). “The economic value of instream flow: A review of methodology and benefit estimates for optimum flows.” J. Envir. Mgmt., 24(2), 169–179.
24.
McConnell, K. E. ( 1990). “Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation.” J. Envir. Economic Mgmt., 18(1), 19–34.
25.
Myers, T. ( 1994). “Cumulative hydrologic effects of open pit gold mining in the Humboldt River drainage.” Consulting Rep. to the Sierra Club, Reno.
26.
Netusil, N., Huszar, E., Shaw, W. D., and Leversee, C. ( 1998). “Potential economic impacts of mine dewatering in the Humboldt River basin: Preliminary survey results.” Proc., Annu. Meetings of the University Council on Water Resources, Hood River, Oreg.
27.
Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology (NBMG). ( 1997). “The Nevada mineral industry: 1997.” Spec. Publ. MI-1997.
28.
Nevada State Demographer. ( 1999). “Nevada population estimates for counties, cities, and unincorporated towns.” University of Nevada, Reno.
29.
O'Leary, R. ( 1994). “The bureaucratic politics paradox: The case of wetlands legislation in Nevada.” J. Public Admin. Res. Theory, 4, 443–467.
30.
Plume, R. W. ( 1995). “Water resources and potential effects of ground-water development in Maggie, Marys, and Susie Creek Basins, Elko and Eureka Counties, Nevada.” Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 94-4222, U.S. Geological Srvey,
31.
Ready, R., Buzby, J., and Hu, D. ( 1996). “Differences between continuous and discrete contingent value estimates.” Land Economics, 72(3), 397–411.
32.
Schulze, W., McClelland, G., Waldman, D., and Lazo, J. ( 1996). “Sources of bias in contingent valuation.” The contingent valuation of environmental resources: Methodological issues and research needs, D. J. Bjornstad and J. R. Kahn, eds., Edward Elgar, Brookfield.
33.
Shevenell, L., Connors, K. A., and Henry, C. ( 1998). “Water quality at sixteen open pits in Nevada.” NBMG Open-File Rep. 98-1, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology.
34.
Smith, V. K. ( 1992). “Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts: Comment.” J. Envir. Economic Mgmt., 22(1), 71–89.
35.
Smith, V. K. ( 1999). “Of birds and books: More on hypothetical referenda.” J. Political Economy, 107(1), 197–200.
36.
State of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. ( 1992). Nevada water facts. Nevada Division of Water Planning. Carson City, Nev.
37.
State of Nevada Division of Water Resources. ( 1999). “Preliminary pumpage figures for major mines in the Humboldt River basin.” Carson City, Nev.
38.
Walsh, R., Johnson, D. M., and McKean, J. R. ( 1990). “Nonmarket values from two decades of research on recreation demand.” Advances in applied micro-economics, A. Link and V. K. Smith, eds., Jai Press, Greenwich, Conn.
39.
Welsh, M. P., and Poe, G. L. ( 1998). “Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach.” J. Envir. Economic Mgmt., 36(2), 170–185.
40.
White, H. ( 1982). “Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models.” Econometrica, 50(1), 1–25.
41.
Willimack, D. K., Schuman, H., Pennell, P., and Lepkowski, J. M. ( 1995). “Effects of a prepaid nonmonetary incentive on response rates and response quality in face-to-face surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 95(1), 78–94.
42.
Zilberman, D., Macdougall, N., and Shah, S. ( 1994). “Changes in water allocation mechanisms for California agriculture.” Cont. Economic Policy, 12(1), 122–133.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 127 • Issue 6 • December 2001
Pages: 369 - 377
History
Received: Dec 20, 1999
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.