TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 1, 2000

Statewide Non-Point-Source Pollution Assessment Methodology

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 126, Issue 3

Abstract

We present a new methodology for performing Virginia's statewide, watershed-level non-point-source pollution assessment. The problems and inconsistencies inherent in previous methodologies were addressed and improved upon. The revised methodology utilizes geographic information system technology, a database management system, and computer modeling. Statewide land cover, soils, and topographic digital data were used to develop input parameters for a simple nutrient and sediment loading model, resulting in an assessment based on estimated loadings for each of the predefined 493 hydrologic units in the state. The resulting model output includes runoff volume, sediment loading, and dissolved and sediment-attached nitrogen and phosphorus. The estimated loads were used to rank the hydrologic units for potential non-point-source pollution and compared with rankings from a previous assessment. The revised methodology is based on annual pollutant loadings, and no attempts were made to “weight” or subjectively impose importance to sources or constituents as with the previous methodology. The new methodology, resulting watershed priorities, and recommendations for further refinement are presented in this paper.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Beaulac, M. N., and Reckhow, K. H. (1982). “An examination of land use—Nutrient export relationships.” Water Resour. Bull., 18(6), 1013–1022.
2.
CBP. (1996). “Chesapeake Bay Program tributary strategies: Interim 1996 progress report.” Rep., Tributary Strategy Workgroup, Nutrient Subcommittee, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Md.
3.
CBP. (1998). “Phase IV Chesapeake Bay Program watershed model.” Rep., Modeling Subcommittee, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Md.
4.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5.
Cole, C. (1990). “Ranking of Puget Sound watersheds for the control of nonpoint source pollution: An evaluation report.” Rep., Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, Seattle.
6.
CTIC. ( 1990). “National survey of conservation tillage practices.” National Association of Conservation Districts, Conservation Technology Information Center, West Lafayette, Ind.
7.
Haith, D. A., and Tubbs, L. J. (1981). “Watershed loading functions for nonpoint sources.”J. Envir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(1), 121–137.
8.
Hamlett, J. M., Miller, D. A., Day, R. L., Peterson, G. W., Baumer, G. M., and Russo, J. (1992). “Statewide GIS-based ranking of watersheds for agricultural pollution prevention.” J. Soil and Water Conservation, 47(5), 399–404.
9.
Hession, W. C. ( 1995). “A watershed-level ecological risk assessment methodology.” PhD dissertation, Biosystems Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla.
10.
Hession, W. C., McBride, M., and Misiura, L. (1997). “Revised Virginia nonpoint source pollution assessment methodology.” Rep., Final report submitted to the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Philadelphia, Pa.
11.
Hession, W. C., Storm, D. E., Haan, C. T., Burks, S. L., and Matlock, M. D. (1996a). “A watershed-level ecological risk assessment methodology.” Water Resour. Bull., 32(5), 1039–1054.
12.
Hession, W. C., Storm, D. E., Haan, C. T., Reckhow, K. H., Smolen, M. D., and Burks, S. L. (1996b). “Risk analysis of TMDLs in an uncertain environment.” Lake and Reserv. Mgmt., 12(3), 331–347.
13.
Holstine, L. L., and Lowman, S. M. (1985). “Setting agricultural pollution control priorities.” J. Soil and Water Conservation, 40(1), 65–67.
14.
Hynes, H. B. N. (1975). “The stream and its valley.” Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 19, 1–15.
15.
Iman, R. L., and Conover, W. J. (1982). “A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables.” Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 11(3), 311–334.
16.
Mills, W. B. et al. (1985). “Water quality assessment: A screening procedure for toxic and conventional pollutants in surface and ground water—Part I.” EPA-600/6-85-002a, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
17.
Morgan, M. G., and Henrion, M. (1992). Uncertainty, a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
18.
Nielsen, G. A., Caprio, J. M., McDaniel, P. A., Snyder, R. D., and Montagne, C. (1990). “MAPS: A GIS for land resource management in Montana.” J. Soil and Water Conservation, 45(4), 450–453.
19.
Odum, E. P. (1969). “The strategy of ecosystem development.” Sci., 164, 263–270.
20.
Reckhow, K. H., Coffey, S., Henning, M. H., Smith, K., and Banting, R. (1992). “EUTROMOD: Technical guidance and spreadsheet models for nutrient loading and lake eutrophication.” Rep., School of the Envir., Duke University, Durham, N.C.
21.
Reynolds, C. S. (1993). “The ecosystems approach to water management, the main features of the ecosystem concept.” J. Aquatic Ecosystems Health, 2, 3–8.
22.
Schwab, G. O., Frevert, R. K., Edminster, T. W., and Barnes, K. K. (1981). Soil and water conservation engineering. Wiley, New York.
23.
Spickler, D. L. (1984). “Priority watersheds for the potential release of agricultural non-point phosphorus and nitrogen.” Rep., Maryland State Soil Conservation Committee, Md.
24.
Stanford, J. A., and Ward, J. V. ( 1992). “Management of aquatic resources in large catchments: Recognizing interactions between ecosystem connectivity and environmental disturbance.” Watershed management: Balancing sustainability and environmental change, R. J. Naiman, ed., Springer, New York, 91–124.
25.
Srinivasan, R., and Arnold, J. G. (1994). “Integration of a basin-scale water quality model with GIS.” Water Resour. Bull., 30(3), 453–462.
26.
USDA. (1994). “State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) database: Data use information.” Rep., Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Worth, Tex.
27.
USEPA. (1991). “Guidance on the award and management of nonpoint source program implementation grants under section 319(h) of the Clean Water Act.” Rep., Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
28.
USEPA. (1995). “Watershed protection: A statewide approach.” Rep., EPA 841-R-95-004, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
29.
USEPA. (1998). “Clean water action plan: Restoring and protecting America's waters.” Rep., EPA 840-R-98-001, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
30.
Vanoni, V. (1975). Sedimentation engineering. ASCE, New York.
31.
VCES. (1986). “So you'd like to operate a small or part-time farm.” Rep., Publication 446-790, Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Virginia Tech and Virginia State, Richmond, Va.
32.
VDCR. (1989). “Virginia nonpoint source pollution assessment report.” Rep., Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Richmond, Va.
33.
VDCR. (1993). “Virginia nonpoint source pollution watershed assessment.” Rep., Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Richmond, Va.
34.
VDCR. ( 1995). “Virginia hydrologic unit atlas.” Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, Va.
35.
VDCR. (1997). “Virginia nonpoint source pollution watershed assessment.” Rep., Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Richmond, Va.
36.
Vogelmann, J. E., Sohl, T. L., Campbell, P. V., and Shaw, D. M. (1998). “Regional land cover characterization using Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources.” Envir. Mon. and Assess., 51(1/2), 415–428.
37.
VWCB. (1990). “Virginia water quality assessment.” Rep., Information Bulletin 579, 305(b), Report to EPA and Congress. Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Water Control Board, Richmond, Va.
38.
Wischmeier, W. H., and Smith, D D. (1978). “Predicting rainfall erosion loss—A guide to conservation planning.” Rep., Agricultural Handbook No. 537, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 126Issue 3May 2000
Pages: 146 - 155

History

Received: Aug 20, 1999
Published online: May 1, 2000
Published in print: May 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405; formerly, Biosys. Engrg. Sect. Leader, Patrick Ctr. for Envir. Res., Acad. of Natural Sci., Philadelphia, PA. E-mail: hession@ emba.uvm.edu
Grad. Res. Asst., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA; formerly, Asst. Sci., Patrick Ctr. for Envir. Res., Acad. of Natural Sci., Philadelphia, PA.
Modeling/Total Maximum Daily Load Program Mgr., Virginia Dept. of Cons. and Rec., Richmond, VA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share