Watershed-Scale Water Quality Impacts of Riparian Forest Management
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 125, Issue 3
Abstract
The SPANS (SPatial ANalysis System) Geographic Information System (GIS) and the Georgia Landcover Database were used to identify land use within the 333 km2 Little River Research Watershed of Georgia and to perform a variety of spatial analyses with the purpose of determining the water quality impact of riparian forest management within the watershed. The watershed contains a dense dendritic stream network, with approximately 54% of a 30 m riparian buffer on either side of all streams of second order or larger currently in forest cover. Approximately 60% of the upland is in some type of agricultural production. GIS analyses were used to extrapolate field-scale measurements on riparian forest nonpoint-source-pollution nutrient buffering capacity to the watershed-scale, and to evaluate the water quality impact of three increasing deforestation and three increasing reforestation riparian forest management scenarios. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) loadings at the watershed outlet could potentially increase by 16.7 and 9.5%, respectively, under a 50% riparian buffer deforestation scenario. Decreases in potential N and P loadings of 13.2 and 7.4%, respectively, could potentially occur under a 50% reforestation scenario. Fragmentation analysis of the riparian buffer indicated that only six blocks of riparian forest at least 2 km long remained in the entire watershed, confirming the fragmented state of the riparian forest.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Altier, L. S. et al. ( 1994). “An ecosystem model for the management of riparian areas.” Riparian Ecosystems in the Humid U.S.: Functions, Values and Management. Nat. Assoc. of Conservation Districts, Washington, D.C., 373–387.
2.
“Understanding GIS: The ARC/INFO method.” (1990). Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, Calif.
3.
Fail, J. L. Jr., Hamzah, M. N., Haines, B. L., and Todd, R. L. ( 1986). “Above and below ground biomass, production, and element accumulation in riparian forests of an agricultural watershed.” Watershed Research Perspectives, D. L. Correll, ed., Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 193–224.
4.
“Georgia nonpoint source management program.” (1996). Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, Atlanta, Ga.
5.
Harrison, K. A., and Tyson, A. W. ( 1997). “Agricultural irrigation trends in Georgia.” Proc., 1997 Georgia Water Resour. Conf., K. J. Hatcher ed., Inst. of Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga., 127–130.
6.
Hendrickson, O. Q. Jr. ( 1981). “Flux of nitrogen and carbon gases in bottomland soils of an agricultural watershed,” PhD thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
7.
Jacobs, T. C., and Gilliam, J. W. ( 1985). “Riparian losses of nitrate from agricultural drainage water.” J. Environ. Qual., 14(4), 472–478.
8.
Jordan, T. E., Correll, D. L., and Weller, D. E. ( 1993). “Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland.” J. Environ. Qual., 22(4), 467–473.
9.
Joyce, C. M. ( 1985). “Nitrogen transformations in temporary blackwater streams of the southeast U.S. coastal plain,” PhD thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
10.
Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., and Asmussen, L. E. ( 1983). “Waterborne nutrient budgets for the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed.” Agr. Ecosystems and Envir., 10, 371–384.
11.
Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., and Asmussen, L. E. ( 1984a). “Nutrient cycling in an agricultural watershed: I. Phreatic movement.” J. Environ. Qual., 13(1), 22–27.
12.
Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., and Asmussen, L. E. ( 1984b). “Nutrient cycling in an agricultural watershed: II. Streamflow and artificial drainage.” J. Environ. Qual., 13(1), 27–32.
13.
Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., Fail, J. L., Jr. Hendrickson, O., Leonard, R., and Asmussen, L. E. ( 1984c). “Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds.” Bioscience, 34(6), 374–377.
14.
Lowrance, R. R., Leonard, R. A., Asmussen, L. E., and Todd, R. L. ( 1985). “Nutrient budgets for agricultural watersheds in the southeastern coastal plain.” Ecology, 66(1), 287–296.
15.
Lowrance, R. R. et al. ( 1995). “Water quality functions of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.” EPA Rep. 903-R-95-004, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
16.
NRCS. ( 1996). “Model national specification for riparian forest buffers.” Watershed Science Institute, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Seattle, Wash.
17.
Peterjohn, W. T., and Correll, D. L. ( 1984). “Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest.” Ecology, 65(5), 1466–1475.
18.
Sheridan, J. M., and Ferreira, V. A. ( 1992). “Physical characteristic and geomorphic data for Little River watersheds, Georgia.” Res. Rep. SEWRL 099201, Southeast Watershed Research Lab., USDA-ARS, Tifton, Ga.
19.
Vellidis, G., Lowrance, R. R., Smith, M. C., and Hubbard, R. K. ( 1993). “Methods to assess the water quality impact of a restored riparian wetland.” J. Soil and Water Conservation, 48(3), 223–230.
20.
Vellidis, G., Lowrance, R. R., and Smith, M. C. ( 1994). “A quantitative approach for measuring N and P concentration changes in surface runoff of a restored riparian wetland forest.” Wetlands, 14(2), 73–81.
21.
Welsch, D. ( 1991). “Riparian forest buffers.” Publ. NA-PR-07-91, USDA-Forest Service, Northeastern Area, Radnor, Pa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 125 • Issue 3 • May 1999
Pages: 117 - 125
History
Published online: May 1, 1999
Published in print: May 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.