TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 1996

Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation System Optimization

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 122, Issue 2

Abstract

A ground-water management model using a nonlinear programming algorithm was developed to find the minimum cost design of the combined pumping and treatment components of a pump-and-treat remediation system and includes the fixed costs of system construction and installation as well as operation and maintenance. The fixed-cost terms of the objective function are incorporated into the nonlinear programming formulation using a penalty coefficient method. Results of applying the model to an aquifer with homogeneous hydraulic conductivity show that a combined well field and treatment process model that includes fixed costs has a significant impact on the design and cost of these systems, reducing the cost by using fewer, larger-flow-rate wells. Previous pump-and-treat design formulations have resulted in systems with numerous, low-flow-rate wells due to the use of simplified cost functions that do not exhibit economies of scale or fixed costs. Two example aquifers with heterogeneous conductivity fields were also investigated, and system costs similar to the homogeneous case were obtained. However, the introduction of aquifer heterogeneity did affect the remediation design, for example, well locations and pumping rates. Trade-offs between total remediation system cost and cleanup standard, remediation period, and typical design parameters of air-stripping towers are examined through sensitivity analysis. Generally, the optimal injection concentration is found to be approximately 70–80% of the cleanup standard. Designs with remediation periods around 5–6 yr have the minimum cost for the case study presented in this paper. Remediation periods beyond 6 yr are not economically justified, since the tower operating costs become dominant and offset the reduction of capital cost.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Ackermann, W. C.(1969). “Cost of wells and pumps.”Ground Water, 7(1), 35–39.
2.
Aguado, E., Remson, I., Pikul, M. F., and Thomas, W. A.(1974). “Optimum pumping for aquifer dewatering.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 100, 860–877.
3.
Ahlfeld, D. P. (1986). “Designing contaminated groundwater remediation systems using numerical simulation and nonlinear optimization,” PhD dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.
4.
Ahlfeld, D. P. (1990). “Determining the relationship between groundwater remediation cost and effectiveness.”Computational methods in water resources, computational methods in subsurface hydrology, G. Gambolati et al., eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 277–282.
5.
Ahlfeld, D. P., Mulvey, J. M., Pinder, G. F., and Wood, E. F.(1988). “Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization and sensitivity theory, 1, Model development.”Water Resour. Res., 24(3), 431–441.
6.
Ahlfeld, D. P., Page, R. H., and Pinder, G. F.(1995). “Optimal ground-water remediation methods applied to a Superfund site: From formulation to implementation.”Groundwater, 33(1), 58–70.
7.
Ball, P., Jones, D., and Kavanaugh, C.(1984). “Mass transfer of volatile organic compounds in packed tower aeration.”WPCF J., 56(2), 127–136.
8.
Bear, J. (1972). Dynamics of fluids in porous media . Elsevier, New York, N.Y.
9.
Bouwer, H. (1978). Groundwater hydrology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
10.
Clark, R. M., and Adams, J. Q. (1991). “A manual for selecting packed tower aeration systems: with and without off-gas control.”Drinking water and groundwater remediation cost evaluation: Air stripping. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, England.
11.
Crittenden, J., Cortright, R., Rick, B., Tang, S., and Perram, D.(1988). “Using GAC to remove VOCs from air stripper off-gas.”J. AWWA, 80(5), 73–84.
12.
Culver, T. B., and Shoemaker, C. A.(1992). “Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods.”Water Resour. Res., 28(3), 629–641.
13.
Dougherty, D. E., and Marryott, R. A. (1991). “Optimal groundwater management: 1. Simulated annealing. Water Resour. Res., 27(10), 2493–2508.
14.
Dvorak, B. I. (1994). “Selecting among treatment options for removing synthetic organics from water,” PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
15.
Goodman, C. (1984). “Predicting mass transfer coefficients for packed tower air stripping of dilute organics,” MS thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
16.
Gorelick, S. M.(1983). “A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling method.”Water Resour. Res., 19(2), 305–319.
17.
Gorelick, S. M., Freeze, R. A., Donohue, D., and Keeley, J. F. (1993). Groundwater contamination: optimal capture and containment, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, England.
18.
Gorelick, S. M., Remson, I., and Cottle, R. W.(1979). “Management model of a groundwater system with a transient pollutant source.”Water Resour. Res., 15(5), 1243–1249.
19.
Gorelick, S. M., Voss, C. I., Gill, P. E., Murray, W., Saunders, M. A., and Wright, M. H.(1984). “Aquifer reclamation design: The use of contaminant transport simulation combined with nonlinear programming.”Water Resour. Res., 20(4), 415–427.
20.
Gumerman, R. C., Burris, B. E., and Hansen, S. P. (1985). “Estimation of small system water treatment costs.”EPA-600/S2-84-184, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
21.
Hand, W., Crittenden, C., Gehin, J. L., and Lykins, W. Jr.(1986). “Design and evaluation of an air-stripping tower for removing VOCs from groundwater.”J. AWWA, 78(9), 87–97.
22.
Handler, N. E. (1988). “Air stripping of volatile organics in packed columns: Experiments and mathematical modeling,” MS thesis, Univeristy of Texas, Austin.
23.
Huyakorn, P. S., and Pinder, G. F. (1983). Computational methods in subsurface flow . Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
24.
Kavanaugh, C., and Trussell R. (1980). “Design of aeration towers to strip volatile contaminants from drink water,”J. AWWA, 72(12), 684–692.
25.
Lasdon, L. S., and Waren, A. D. (1978). “Generalized reduced gradient software for linearly and nonlinearly constrained problems.”Design and implementation of optimization software, H. J. Greenberg, ed., Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, 363–397.
26.
Lee, S., and Kitanidis, P. K.(1991). “Optimal estimation and scheduling in aquifer remediation with incomplete information.”Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 2203–2217.
27.
Lefkoff, L. J., and Gorelick, S. M.(1986). “Design and cost analysis of rapid aquifer restoration systems using flow simulation and quadratic programming.”Groundwater, 24(6), 777–790.
28.
McKinney, D. C., and Lin, M-D.(1994). “Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models.”Water Resour. Res., 30(6), 1897–1906.
29.
McKinney, D. C., and Lin, M-D.(1995). “Approximate mixed-integer nonlinear programming methods for optimal aquifer remediation design.”Water Resour. Res., 31(3), 731–740.
30.
Molz, F. J., and Bell, L. C.(1977). “Head gradient control in aquifers used for fluid storage.”Water Resour. Res., 13(4), 795–798.
31.
Montgomery, J. H., and Welkom, L. M. Groundwater chemicals desk reference, Lewis Publ., Chelsea, England.
32.
Onda, K., Tadeuchi, H., and Okumoto, Y.(1968). “Mass transfer coefficients between gas and liquid phases in packed columns.”J. Chem. Engr. of Japan, 1, 56–63.
33.
Plumb, R. H. Jr., and Pitchford, A. M. (1985). “Volatile organic scans: Implications for ground water monitoring.”Proc., Pet. Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection and Restoration, Nat'l. Water Well Assoc.–Am. Pet. Inst., Houston, Tex., 207–222.
34.
“Revised priority list of hazardous substances.” (1991). Federal Register 56(201: October 17), 52165–52175.
35.
Sawyer, C. S., and Ahlfeld, D. P. (1992). “A mixed-integer model for minimum cost of remediating a multilayer aquifer.”Computational methods in water resources: Numerical methods in water resources, T. F. Russell et al., eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London, England, 353–360.
36.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1988). “Guidance on remedial actions for contaminated groundwater at superfund sites.”EPA 540/G-88/003, Washington, D.C.
37.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1989). “Control of air emissions from superfund air stripper at superfund groundwater sites.”OSWER Directive 9355.0-28, Washington, D.C.
38.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1990). “Basics of pump-and-treat ground-water remediation technology.”EPA 600/8-90/003, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Okla.
39.
Willis, R. L.(1976). “Optimal groundwater quality management: Well injection of waste waters.”Water Resour. Res., 12(1), 47–53.
40.
Willis, R. L., and Yeh, W. W-G. (1987). Groundwater systems planning and management, Prentice Hall Publishers, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
41.
Yang, A. P. (1990). “Stochastic heterogeneity and dispersion.” PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 122Issue 2March 1996
Pages: 128 - 136

History

Published online: Mar 1, 1996
Published in print: Mar 1996

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daene C. McKinney, Associate Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.
Min-Der Lin
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Envir. Engrg., Nat. Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung, Taiwan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share