Experiment with Simulation Models in Water-Resources Negotiations
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 122, Issue 1
Abstract
A laboratory experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of various kinds of access to a simulation model on water-resources negotiation outcomes and processes. The (mock) negotiation involved determining a release schedule from two reservoirs through a negotiation between subjects representing hydroelectric, agricultural, and flood-control interests. Results revealed the following: (1) The model was of only limited value in helping negotiators understand the behavior of the environmental system; (2) the model did provide assistance in finding policies that satisfied specific task constraints; (3) the availability of the model encouraged negotiators to consider more policies; and (4) the benefits of using the model directly, rather than getting access to model results produced by an assistant, were offset by the burden of direct use. The findings are evaluated in light of a growing trend in many governmental organizations to make water-resources simulation models available to stakeholders and the public at large.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Andrews, C. J. (1991). “Consensus on a shoestring: the efficacy of packaged models in joint fact-finding.”Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Comp. in Urban Plng. and Mgmt., R. E. Klosterman, ed., Inst. for Comp.-Aided Plng., Univ. of Akron, Ohio.
2.
Carnevale, P. J. D., and Isen, A. M. (1986). “The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation.”Org. Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37, 1–13.
3.
Colorado Department of Natural Resources. (1994). “CRDSS Update, Colorado River Decision Support System Development News.” Colorado Water Conservation Board, Div. of Water Resour., Denver, Colo.
4.
Dames & Moore, and CADSWES. (1993). Feasibility study report for a Colorado River decision support system . Colo. Dept. of Natural Resour., Denver, Colo.
5.
Dennis, A. R., and Gallupe, R. B. (1993). “A history of group support systems empirical research: lessons learned and future directions.”Group support systems: new perspectives, L. M. Jessup and J. S. Valacich, eds., Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y., 59–77.
6.
Dickson, G. W., Lee, J. E., Robinson, L., and Heath, R. (1989). “Observations on GDSS interaction: chauffeured, facilitated, and user-driven systems.”Proc., 22nd Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. on Sys. Sci., R. Blanning and D. King, eds., Vol. III, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 337–343.
7.
Fulp, T., et al. (1994). Decision support for water resources management in the Colorado River . U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, Nev.
8.
Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., and Schmitt, N.(1987). “Student guinea pigs: porcine predictors and particularistic phenomena.”Acad. of Mgmt. Rev., 12(1), 160–163.
9.
Gouran, D. S., Brown, C., and Henry, D. R. (1978). “Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision-making discussion.”Communication monographs. 45, 51–63.
10.
Green, S. G., and Taber, T. D.(1980). “The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process.”Org. Behavior and Human Perf., 25, 97–106.
11.
Greenberg, J.(1987). “The college sophomore as guinea pig: setting the record straight.”Acad. of Mgmt. Rev., 12(1), 157–159.
12.
Greenhalgh, L., Neslin, S. A., and Gilkey, R. W.(1985). “The effects of negotiator preferences, situational power, and negotiator personality on outcomes of business negotiations.”Acad. of Mgmt. J., 28(1), 9–33.
13.
Johnson, L. E.(1990). “Computer-aided planning for multiple-purpose reservoir operations policies.”AWRA Water Resour. Bull., 26(2), 299–311.
14.
Jones, E. J., and Yaffee, S. L. (1992). The Two Forks Project: Discussion Draft . School of Natural Resour., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
15.
Kraemer, K. L. (1985). “Modeling as negotiating: the political dynamics of computer models in policy making.”Adv. in Information Processing in Orgs. 2, 275–307.
16.
Luecke, D. F.(1990). “Water resources: controversy over Two Forks Dam.”Envir., 32, 42–45.
17.
McGrath, J., Martin, J., and Kulka, R. (1982). Judgment Calls in Research . Sage Publications, Inc., Beverly Hills, Calif.
18.
Palmer, R. N., Keyes, A. M., and Fisher, S. (1993). “Empowering stakeholders through simulation in water resources planning.”Water Management in the '90s; a Time for Innovation, K. Hon, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 451–454.
19.
Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K.(1989). “The impact of technological support on groups: an assessment of the empirical research.”Decision Support Sys., 5, 197–216.
20.
Pruitt, D. G., and Carnevale, P. J. D. (1982). “The development of integrative agreements.”Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research, V. Derlega and J. Grizelak, eds., Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
21.
Randall, D., Sheer, D. P., and Meyer, H. (1988). “Computer-aided negotiation of water resources issues in California's central valley project.”Computerized Decision Support Systems for Water Managers, J. W. Labadie, L. E. Brazil, I. Corfu, and L. E. Johnson, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
22.
Reitsma, R. F., Sautins, A. M., and Wehrend, S. C.(1994). “Construction kit for river basin models.”J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., 8(3), 378–384.
23.
Session Laws of Colorado. (1993). State of Colorado. Chapter 254, Section 3. Denver, Colo.
24.
Walton, R. E., and McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations . McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 122 • Issue 1 • January 1996
Pages: 64 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1996
Published in print: Jan 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.