Market Models, Protest Bids, and Outliers in Contingent Valuation
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 120, Issue 1
Abstract
Responses to willingness‐to‐pay questions in contingent valuation (CV) surveys are being used with increasing frequency to obtain estimates of the value of public goods, such as improved water quality, for use in benefit‐cost analyses. Analysts must decide whether the appropriate conceptual model for any particular application is a private or a political market. When estimating willingness‐to‐pay and total benefits, analysts must decide whether to censor outliers and certain zero responses, called protest bids, from data sets. Issues associated with identification of protest bids are reviewed, and alternate methods for the treatment of outliers are discussed. The significance of these methodological decisions is illustrated with an example involving willingness to pay for new storm water programs in Baltimore County, Md. to help achieve Chesapeake Bay nutrient‐reduction objectives. It is argued that decisions concerning analysis of troublesome responses should be consistent with the choice of market model for the application.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of colinearity. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
2.
Carson, R. T., and Mitchell, R. C. (1986). “The value of clean water: the public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water.” Discussion paper QE85‐08, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
3.
Economic and environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies. (1983). U.S. Water Resour. Council, Washington, D.C.
4.
Fischhoff, B., and Furby, L. (1988). “Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility.” J. Risk and Uncertainty, 1(2), 147–184.
5.
Fox, J. (1984). Linear statistical models and related methods. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Hobbs, B. F., Stakhiv, E. Z., and Grayman, W. M. (1989). “Impact evaluation procedures: theory, practice, and needs.” J. of Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., 115(1), 2–21.
7.
Lindsey, G. (1992). “An experiment in contingent valuation: willingness to pay for storm water management,” PhD thesis, The Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, Md.
8.
Milon, J. W. (1989). “Contingent valuation experiments for strategic behavior.” J. Envir. Economics and Mgmt., 17(3), 293–308.
9.
Mitchell, R. C., and Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
10.
Moser, D. A., and Dunning, M. C. (1986). “Volume II: a guide for using the contingent value methodology in recreation studies.” National economic development procedures manual—recreation, U.S. Army Corps of Engrs., Inst. for Water Resour., Fort Belvoir, Va.
11.
Rowe, R. D., d'Arge, R. C., and Brookshire, D. S. (1980). “An experiment on the economic value of visibility.” Envir. Economics and Mgmt., 7(1), 1–19.
12.
Smith, V. K., and Desvousges, W. H. (1986). Measuring water quality benefits. Kluwer‐Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, Ma.
13.
Stitt, T. A. (1986). “Establishing a storm water management utility.” Public Works, 117(9), 126–127, 150, 152, 154, 156.
14.
Wilkinson, L. (1988). SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, Ill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 23, 1992
Published online: Jan 1, 1994
Published in print: Jan 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.