Evaluating Locally Financed Reservoir: The Case of Applewhite
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 119, Issue 6
Abstract
In an era when subsidized water development is not available to municipalities, development costs are fully borne by the rate‐paying clientele. Proposed water projects therefore impact consumers both through increased rates and increased water supply. Economic evaluation requires attention to the interdependent effects of both changes. Under these circumstances it is inappropriate to calculate the benefits of a project due to the enhancement of supply and then obtain net benefits by deducting project costs. A framework for the proper analysis of locally financed water development is proposed and then employed to evaluate the highly controversial Applewhite Reservoir in San Antonio, Tex. The study indicates that cost recovery will take substantially longer than proposed, net present value is negative under baseline conditions, and the project was initiated prematurely from the perspective of the welfare of local water consumers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allanach, W. C. Jr., and Nickerson, B. A. (1990). “The genesis of surface water for San Antonio.” Rep., ASCE, Boston Society of Civil Engineers Section, Boston, Mass.
2.
Billings, R. B. (1990). “Demand‐based benefit‐cost model of participation in water project.” J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 116(5), 593–609.
3.
Crimmins, P. (1991). “CWB: eyeing new rates to offset usage decrease.” San Antonio Light, (Oct. 10).
4.
Duffield, J. W. (1980). “Auburn Dam: a case study of water policy and economics.” Water Resour. Bull., 16, 226–34.
5.
Griffin, R. C., and Chang, C. (1991). “Seasonality in community water demand.” Western J. Agric. Economics, 16(Dec.), 207–217.
6.
Griffin, R. C., and Stoll, J. R. (1983). “The enhanced role of water conservation in the cost‐benefit analysis of water projects.” Water Resour. Bull., 19(Jun.), 447–457.
7.
Jacobs, J. J., and Taylor, D. T. (1989). “The increased role of states in water management: the Wyoming experience.” Western J. Agric. Economics, 14, 261–67.
8.
Martin, Q. W. (1987). “Hierarchical algorithm for water supply expansion.” J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(5), 677–695.
9.
Martin, W. J., and Thackston, E. L. (1980). “A retrospective benefit‐cost analysis of water resource projects in the Cumberland River Basin.” Water Resour. Bull., 16, 1006–1011.
10.
Projections of the population of Texas and counties in Texas by age, sex and race/ethnicity for 1990–2025. (1988). Department of Rural Sociology, State Data Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Tex.
11.
San Antonio regional water resource study. (1986). CH2M‐Hill Central, Inc.
12.
Special Committee report to the 72nd Legislature [Edwards Aquifer]. (1991). Austin, Tex.
13.
“Study on the yield of Applewhite.” (1990). Rep., Freese and Nichols, Inc., Fort Worth, Tex.
14.
Survey of current business. (1989–92). U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
15.
Water for Texas—today and tomorrow. (1990). Texas Water Development Board, Austin, Tex.
16.
Water statistics, 1991. (no year). City Water Board, San Antonio, Tex.
17.
Wolfram, S. (1991). Mathematica: a system for doing mathematics by computer, 2nd Ed., Addison‐Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 119 • Issue 6 • November 1993
Pages: 628 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 14, 1992
Published online: Nov 1, 1993
Published in print: Nov 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.