Ground‐Water‐Management Areas in United States
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 116, Issue 4
Abstract
Laws governing ground‐water withdrawals have been adjusted to reflect the desire and need to prevent resource depletion and conflict among users. Courts today are inclined to regard ground water more as a shared public resource that is subject to management and regulation than as private property with rights of unlimited use. Also, state legislatures are passing comprehensive ground‐water‐management statutes to prevent depletion and conflict and to reduce historic reliance on the courts to settle ground‐water disputes. This has been called a “management doctrine” for ground water. One example of the management doctrine is the use of ground‐water‐management areas to regulate regional ground‐water withdrawals when and where that is necessary. This paper summarizes the results of a nationwide survey to collect information about the nature and distribution of ground‐water‐management‐area programs around the country. Results show that 27 states allow for formation of special management areas to address some type of ground‐water‐quantity problem; some areas also address ground‐water‐quality problems. This paper describes some of the common aspects of management‐area programs. One distinction of interest is that while most states place the responsibility of controlling management areas with some central state agency, several states have opted to leave that responsibility with the local ground‐water users. The heavily irrigated states of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and Texas stand out in this regard.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aiken, J. D. (1980). “Nebraska ground water law and administration.” Nebraska Law Review, 59, 917–1000.
2.
Aiken, J. D., and Supalla, R. J. (1979). 'Ground water management in Nebraska.” Proc., Legal, Institutional, and Social Aspects of Irrig. and Drainage and Water Resour. Planning and Mgmt., ASCE, Blacksburg, Va.
3.
Banks, H. O. (1981). “Management of interstate aquifer systems.” J. Water Resour. Planning and Mgmt., 107(2), 563–577.
4.
Bowman, J. A., and Clark, G. R. (1989). “Transitions in midwestern groundwater law.” Water Resour. Bulletin, 25(2), 413–420.
5.
Cisneros, G. D. (1980). “Texas underground water law: The need for conservation and protection of a limited resource.” Texas Tech Law Review, 11, 637–653.
6.
Goldfarb, W. (1988). Water law, 2nd Ed., Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Mich.
7.
Gould, G. A. (1986). “Water law in 1986: Selected issues.” Water Resour. Law. Proc., Nat. Symp. on Water Resour. Law, Amer. Soc. of Agric. Engrs., St. Joseph, Mich., 2–18.
8.
Keller, L. F., Heatwole, C. G., and Weber, J. W. (1981). “Managing crisis: The effectiveness of local districts for control of ground water mining.” Water Resour. Bull., 17(4), 647–654.
9.
McCleskey, G. W. (1972). “Problems and benefits in ground‐water management.” Ground Water, 10(2), 2–5.
10.
Tarlock, A. D. (1985). “An overview of the law of groundwater management.” Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1751–1766.
11.
Wickersham, G. (1984). “Spacing wells in Arizona.” Water Well J., 38(2), 54–55.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1990
Published in print: Jul 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.