TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 1, 1989

Low‐Flow Frequency Analysis Using Probability‐Plot Correlation Coefficients

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 115, Issue 3

Abstract

Although a vast amount of literature exists on the selection of an appropriate probability distribution for annual maximum floodflows, few studies have examined which probability distributions are most suitable to fit to sequences of annual minimum streamflows. Probability plots have been used widely in hydrology as a graphical aid to assess the goodness of fit of alternative distributions. Recently, probability‐plot correlation‐coefficient (PPCC) tests were introduced to test the normal, two‐parameter lognormal and Gumbel hypotheses. Those procedures are extended here to include both regional and at‐site tests for the two‐parameter Weibull and lognormal distributional hypotheses. In theory, PPCC‐hypothesis tests can only be developed for two‐parameter distributions that exhibit a fixed shape. Nevertheless, the PPCC is a useful goodness‐of‐fit statistic for com‐paring three‐parameter distributions. The PPCC derived from fitting the two‐ and three‐parameter lognormal, two‐ and three‐parameter Weibull, and log‐Pearson type III distributions to sequences of annual minimum seven‐day low flows at 23 sites in Massachusetts are compared. How the PPCC can be used to discriminate among both competing distributional hypotheses for the distributions of fixed shape and competing parameter‐estimation procedures for the distributions with variable shape is described. An approximate regional PPCC test is developed and used to show that there is almost no evidence to contradict the hypothesis that annual minimum seven‐day low flows in Massachusetts are two‐parameter lognormal.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Arnell, N. W., Beran, M., and Hosking, J. R. M. (1986). “Unbiased plotting positions for the general extreme value distribution.” J. Hydrology, 86, 59–69.
2.
Beard, L. R. (1974). “Flood flow frequency techniques.” Tech. Rep. CRWR‐119, Center for Res. in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
3.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers. McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., 372–402, 440–475.
4.
Blom, G. (1958). Statistical estimates and transformed beta variables. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 68–75, 143–146.
5.
Bobee, B. B., and Robitaille, R. (1977). “The use of the Pearson type III and log Pearson type 3 distributions revisited.” Water Resour. Res., 13(2), 427–443.
6.
Cohen, A. C. (1975). “Multi‐censored sampling in the three parameter Weibull distribution.” Technometrics, 17(3), 347–351.
7.
Condie, R., and Nix, G. A. (1975). “Modeling of low flow frequency distributions and parameter estimation,” presented at Int. Water Resour. Symp., Water for Arid Lands, Teheran, Iran, Dec. 8–9.
8.
Cunnane, C. (1978). “Unbiased plotting positions—a review.” J. Hydrology, 37, 205–222.
9.
Deininger, R. A., and Westfield, J. D. (1969). “Estimation of the parameters of Gumbel's third asymptotic distribution by different methods.” Water Resour. Res., 5(6), 1238–1243.
10.
Dubey, S. D. (1967). “Some percentile estimators for Weibull parameters.” Technometrics, 9(1), 128.
11.
Filliben, J. J. (1975). “The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality.” Technometrics, 17(1), 111–117.
12.
Gringorten, I. I. (1963). “A plotting rule for extreme probability paper.” J. Geophys. Res., 68(3), 813–814.
13.
“Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency.” (1982). Bull. 17B, Interagency Advisary Committee in Water Data, Reston, Va.
14.
Gumbel, E. J. (1954). “Statistical theory of droughts.” Proc. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 80, 1–19.
15.
Gumbel, E. J. (1958). Statistics of extremes. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, N.Y., 299–302.
16.
Gumbel, E. J. (1963). “Statistical forecast of droughts.” Bull. Int. Assoc. Scientific Hydrology, 8(1), 5–23.
17.
Hutchison, N. E. (1975). “National water data storage and retrieval system (WATSTORE) users guide, Volume 1.” Open‐File Rep. 75‐426, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
18.
Joiner, B. L., and Rosenblatt, J. R. (1971). “Some properties of the range in samples from Tukey's symmetric lambda distributions.” J. Amer. Statistical Assoc., 66, 394–399.
19.
Kirby, W. (1972). “Computer generated Wilson‐Hilferty transformation that preserves the first three moments and the lower bound of the Pearson type 3 distribution.” Water Resour. Res., 8(5), 1251–1254.
20.
Kite, G. W. (1977). Frequency and risk analysis in hydrology. Water Resources Publ., Fort Collins, Colo.
21.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Burges, S. J. (1980). “Correction for bias in estimation of the standard deviation and coefficient of skewness of the log Pearson 3 distributions.” Water Resour. Res., 16(4), 762–766.
22.
Loganathan, G. V., Kuo, C. Y., and McCormick, T. C. (1985). “Frequency analysis of low flows,” Nordic Hydrology, 16, 105–128.
23.
Loganathan, G. V., Mattejat, P., Kuo, C. Y., and Diskin, D. H. (1986). “Frequency analysis of low flows: Hypothetical distribution methods and a physically based approach.” Nordic Hydrology, 17, 129–150.
24.
Looney, S. W., and Gulledge, T. R., Jr. (1985). “Use of the correlation coefficient with normal probability plots.” Amer. Statistician, 39(1), 75–79.
25.
Loucks, D. P., Stedinger, J. R., and Haith, D. A. (1981). Water resource systems planning and analysis. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
26.
Matalas, N. C. (1963). “Probability distribution of low flows.” Professional Paper 434‐A, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
27.
Minitab reference manual. (1986). Release 5, Minitab, Inc., State College, Pa.
28.
Obeysekera, J. T. B., and Yevjevich, V. (1985). “A note on simulation of samples of gamma‐autoregressive variables.” Water Resour. Res., 21(10), 1569–1572.
29.
Odeh, R. E., and Evans, J. O. (1974). “Algorithm ASTO: Percentage points of the normal distribution.” Appl. Stat., 23, 96–97.
30.
Riggs, H. C., et al. (1980). “Characteristics of low flows.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 106(5), 717–731.
31.
Stedinger, J. R. (1980). “Fitting log normal distributions.” Water Resour. Res., 16(3), 481–490.
32.
Tasker, G. D. (1983). “Effective record length for the T‐year event.” J. Hydrology, 64, 39–47.
33.
Tasker, G. D. (1987). “A comparison of methods for estimating low flow characteristics of streams.” Water Resour. Bull. 23(6), 1077–1083.
34.
Vogel, R. M. (1986). “The probability plot correlation coefficient test for the normal, lognormal and Gumbel distributional hypotheses.” Water Resour. Res. 22(4), 587–590.
35.
Vogel, R. M. (1987). “Correction to ‘The probability plot correlation coefficient test for the normal, lognormal and Gumbel distributional hypotheses.’” Water Resour. Res. 23(10), 2013.
36.
Wallis, J. R., Matalas, N. C., and Slack, J. R. (1974). “Just a moment!” Water Resour. Res. 10(2), 211–219.
37.
Wingo, D. R. (1972). “Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the Weibull distribution by modified quasilinearizatiori.” IEEE Trans. Reliability, R‐21(2), 89–93.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 115Issue 3May 1989
Pages: 338 - 357

History

Published online: May 1, 1989
Published in print: May 1989

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Richard M. Vogel, Associate Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155
Charles N. Kroll, Student Member, ASCE
Research Asst., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share