Marsh Enhancement by Freshwater Diversion
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 111, Issue 1
Abstract
The delta of the Nueces River, Texas, is a low‐lying coastal marsh with dendritic distributaries and flats, infrequently inundated by flood events overbanking from the river. This study examines the feasibility of improving the ecological value of the marsh by creation of diversion works to increase the frequency and duration of marsh inundation. To this end, the morphology and statistical occurrence of flood events in the Nueces were examined using longperiod gage records on the river. A canonical parameterization of flood events was used as input to a numerical hydrodynamic model of the deltaic system, which predicts the time evolution of flow and water level throughout the delta, and includes provision for simulating distributary confluence and difluence, inundation and dewatering of floodplains and flats, and activation of transient channels. The response of the marsh to specified flood events was computed for various alternative physiographies, including existing conditions and candidate combinations of weirs and diversion channels. Coupled with the statistical frequency of occurrence of the specified flood event, the potential ecological value of each diversion alternative was quantitatively established in terms of total inundation period in key segments of the marsh.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Commons, G., “Flood Hydrographs,” Civil Engineering, Vol. 12, 1942, pp. 571–572.
2.
Day, G. W., Smith, W. G., Wagner, P. R., and Stowe, W. G., “Community Structure and Carbon Budget of a Salt Marsh and Shallow Bay Estuarine System in Louisiana,” Publication No. LSU‐SG‐72‐04, Center for Wetland Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La., 1973.
3.
Dronkers, J. J., Tidal Computations in Rivers and Coastal Waters, North‐Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1964.
4.
Edson, C. J., “Parameters for Relating Unit Hydrographs to Watershed Characteristics,” Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 32, 1951, pp. 591–596.
5.
Gumbel, E. J., Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y., 1958.
6.
Gray, D. M., et al., Handbook of the Principles of Hydrology, Water Information Center, Inc., Huntington, N.Y., 1970.
7.
Gray, D. M., “Derivation of Hydrographs for Small Watersheds for Measurable Physical Characteristics,” Research Bulletin No. 506, Iowa State University Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, 1962.
8.
Haines, E. B., “Nutrient Inputs to the Coastal Zone, the Georgia and South Carolina Shelf,” Estuarine Research, L. E. Cronin, ed., Vol. 1, Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1975.
9.
Hanson, T., and Johnson, H. P., “Unit Hydrograph Methods Compared,” Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 4, 1964, pp. 448–451.
10.
Hauck, L. M., and Ward, G. H., “Hydrodynamic Mass‐Transfer Model of Deltaic Systems,” Estuarine and Wetland Processes, P. Hamilton and K. McDonald, eds., Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, N.Y., 1980, pp. 247–265.
11.
Heinle, D., and Flemer, D. A., “Flows of Materials between Poorly Flooded Tidal Marshes and Estuary,” Marine Biology, Vol. 35, 1976, pp. 359–373.
12.
Henley, D. E., and Rauschuber, D. G., “Studies of Freshwater Needs of Fish and Wildlife Resources in Nueces‐Corpus Christi Bay Area, Texas, Phase 4 Report,” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Biological Services Program, Slidell, La., 1980.
13.
Horton, R. E., “Surface Water Phenomena, Part I: Analysis of the Hydrograph,” Horton Hydrological Laboratory, Voorheesville, N.Y., 1935.
14.
“Hydrology, Supplement A,” Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1957.
15.
Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H., Applied Hydrology, McGraw‐Hill Book Company, New York, N.Y., 1949.
16.
Odum, W. E., “Insidious Alteration of the Estuarine Environment,” Transactions American Fisheries Society, Vol. 99, No. 4, 1970, pp. 836–847.
17.
Proudman, J., Dynamical Oceanography, Methuen & Co., London, England, 1953.
18.
Pillsbury, G. B., Tidal Hydraulics, Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss., 1956.
19.
Ramser, C. E., “Runoff from Small Agricultural Areas,” Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 34, No. 9, 1927, pp. 797–823.
20.
Valiela, I., Teal, J. M., Volkman, S., Shafer, D., and Carpenter, E. J., “Nutrient and Particulate Fluxes in a Salt Marsh Ecosystem: Tidal Exchanges and Inputs by Precipitation and Ground Water,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1978, pp. 798–812.
21.
Ward, G. H., “Hydrography and Circulation Processes of Gulf Estuaries,” Estuarine and Wetland Processes, P. Hamilton and K. MacDonald, eds., Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y., 1980, pp. 183–215.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 111 • Issue 1 • January 1985
Pages: 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1985
Published in print: Jan 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.