Average Annual Fulfillment of Instream Uses
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 110, Issue 4
Abstract
A significant demand for more formal recognition of instream water use has developed at national, regional, and state levels. This poses the need for a methodology to appraise the relative gains and losses which would arise from the imposition of a given instream use policy. Little prior effort has been directed toward this goal because of the difficulties involved in quantifying instream benefits. This paper does not attempt to place a dollar value on instream benefits, but does present a procedure for determining the average annual fulfillment of instream use. Case analyses are presented for ten streams which represent a wide range of hydrologic regimes encountered in the plains environment. Predictive functions developed in this study are useful in evaluating the relative instream use potential of different streams. These relations reflect the general shape of flow duration curves experienced in the plains region during the recreational year and the hydraulic characteristics of plains streams. They would not be applicable in regions exhibiting significantly different hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burns, Clarence V., Kansas Streamflow Characteristics, In‐Channel Hydraulic Geometry of Streams in Kansas, Tech. Rpt #8, Kansas Water Resources Board, Topeka, Kans., June, 1971.
2.
Carswell, William J., Jr., Kansas Streamflow Characteristics, Storage Requirements to Sustain Gross Reservoir Outflow From Small Basins In Kansas, Tech. Rpt #16, Kansas Water Office, Topeka, Kans., June, 1982.
3.
Carter, Jimmy, “Water Policy Initiatives,” House Doc. 95–347, Washington, D.C., June 6, 1978.
4.
Furness, L. W., Kansas Streamflow Characteristics, Flow Duration Curves, Tech. Rpt #1, Kansas Water Resources Board, Topeka, Kans., 1961.
5.
Gould, George A., et al., Promising Strategies for Reserving lnstream Flow, Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Dept. of Interior, Oct., 1977.
6.
Hyra, Ronald, “Methods of Assessing Instream Flows for Recreation,” Instream Flow Information Paper No. 6, Cooperative lnstream Flow Service Group, Ft. Collins, Colo., June, 1978.
7.
Lane, E. W., and Lei, Kai, “Streamflow Variability,” Trans. Amer. Soc. of Civ. Engr., Vol. 115, New York, N.Y., 1980, pp. 1084–1134.
8.
Leopold, L. B., and Maddock, T. J., Jr., The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and Some Physiographic Implications, U.S. Geological Survey Prof. Paper 252, Washington, D.C., 1953.
9.
Smith, Robert L., “Impact of Maintaining Instream Flows on National Water Policy,” Water Policy Initiatives, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, N.Y., 1979, pp. 197–210.
10.
Viessman, Warren, Jr., An Analysis of the President's Water Policy Initiatives, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., June 26, 1978.
11.
Viessman, Warren, Jr., Water Policies for the Future, Chap. 7, Section E, Final Report to the President and the Congress, National Water Commission, June, 1973.
12.
Viessman, Warren, Jr., The Nation's Water Resources 1975‐2000, Vol. 1, Second National Water Assessment, U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C., Dec., 1978.
13.
Viessman, Warren, Jr., “MRBC FY 1980 Regional Priorities,” Bull, of the Missouri River Basin Commission, Vol. 7, No. 1, Omaha, Neb., 1979.
14.
Viessman, Warren, Jr., Final Report of the Governor's Task Force on Water Resources, Topeka, Kans., Jan., 1979.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1984
Published in print: Oct 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.