Lane-Based Dynamic Merge Control Strategy Based on Optimal Thresholds for Highway Work Zone Operations
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 6
Abstract
Despite the potential effectiveness of the dynamic late merge (DLM) control, most existing DLM systems, based on static thresholds, cannot best perform under time-varying traffic conditions. This paper presents an advanced dynamic merge control, called a lane-based dynamic merge control model and its operational algorithm, which is based on the optimized control thresholds that take into account the interactions among the speed, flow, and available work zone capacity. The focus of this study is on how to select the control variables and to determine their optimal thresholds in response to traffic flow dynamics. Evaluation results with extensive simulation experiments have shown the promising properties of the proposed dynamic merge control and its operational algorithm.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from Transportation System Innovation Program (TSIP) funded by Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs (MLTM) of the Korean Government.
References
Beacher, A. G., Fontaine, M. D., and Garber, N. J. (2005a). “Field evaluation of the late merge work zone traffic control.” Proc., 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Beacher, A. G., Fontaine, M. D., and Garber, N. J. (2005b). “Guidelines for using late merge work zone traffic control: Results of a simulation-based study.” Proc., 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Datta, T., Schattler, K., Kar, P., and Guha, A. (2004). “Development and evaluation of an advanced dynamic lane merge traffic control system for 3 to 2 lane transition areas in work zones.” Rep. No. RC-1451, Transportation Research Group, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Wayne State Univ., Detroit, sponsored by Michigan Dept. of Transportation.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1995). Manual on uniform traffic control devices, Part IV, Revision 4, Washington, D.C.
ITT Industries, Inc. (2003). CORSIM run-time extension (RTE) developer’s guide, Systems Division, ATMS R&D and Systems Engineering Program Team, Washington, D.C.
Jain, R., and Smith, J. M. (1997). “Modeling vehicular traffic flow using M/G/C/C state dependent queueing models.” Transp. Sci., 31(4), 323–336.
Kang, K. P., and Chang, G. L. (2006). “A robust model for optimal time-of-day speed control at highway work zones.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 7(1), 115–123.
Kang, K. P., Chang, G. L., and Paracha, J. (2006). “Dynamic late merge control at highway work zones: Evaluation, observations, and suggestions.” Transportation Research Record. 1948, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 86–95.
Kang, K. P., Chang, G. L., and Zou, N. (2004). “Optimal dynamic variable speed limit control for highway work-zone operations.” Transportation Research Record. 1877, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 77–84.
Kraemer, L. B. (1976). “Approximate formulae for the delay in the queueing system GI/GI/1.” Proc., 8th International Teletraffic Congress, International Teletratraffic Congress, Melbourne, 396–402.
McCoy, P. T., and Pesti, G. (2001). “Dynamic late merge control concept for work zones on rural interstate highways.” Transportation Research Record. 1745, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 20–26.
McCoy, P. T., Pesti, G., and Byrd, P. S. (1999). “Alternative driver information to alleviate work zone related delays.” Research Project No. SPR-PL-1(35)P513. Dept. of Civil Engineering College of Engineering and Technology, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb., sponsored by Nebraska Dept. of Roads.
Meyer, E. (2004). “Project year 2002 evaluations: Construction area late merge (CALM) system.” Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, Kan., Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) Pooled Fund Study.
Pesti, G., Jessen, D. R., Byrd, P. S., and McCoy, P. T. (1999). “Traffic flow characteristics of the late merge work zone control strategy.” Transportation Research Record. 1657, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–9.
Taavola, D., Jackels, J., and Swenson, T. (2004). “Dynamic late merge system evaluation: Initial deployment on US-10, summer 2003.” Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, Saint Paul, Minn.
Tarko, A., Kanipakapatnam, S., and Wasson, J. (1998). “Modeling and optimization of the Indiana lane merge control system on approaches to freeway work zones.” FHWA/IN/JTRP-97/12. Joint Transportation Research Program, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind., sponsored by Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
Tarko, A., and Venugopal, S. (2001). “Safety and capacity evaluation of the Indiana lane merge system.” FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/19, Joint Transportation Research Program, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind., sponsored by Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
Vandaele, N., Woensel, T. V., and Verbruggen, A. (2000). “A queueing based traffic flow model.” Transp. Res. D, 5(2), 121–135.
Walters, C. H., Pezoldt, V. J., Womack, K. N., Cooner, S. A., and Kuhn, B. T. (2000). “Understanding road rage: Summary of first-year project activities.” TX-01/4945-1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex., sponsored by Texas Dept. of Transportation Construction Division.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 1, 2007
Accepted: Dec 22, 2008
Published online: May 15, 2009
Published in print: Jun 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.