TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2009

Evaluation of Current Repair Criteria for Longitudinal Barrier with Crash Damage

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 4

Abstract

To protect motorists and avoid tort liability, highway agencies expend considerable resources to repair damaged longitudinal barriers, such as w-beam guardrails. With limited funding available, though, highway agencies are unable to maintain all field-installed systems in the ideal as-built condition. Instead, these agencies focus on repairing only damage that has a detrimental effect on the safety performance of the barrier. The distinction between minor damage and more severe performance-altering damage, however, is not always clear. This paper presents a critical review of current U.S. and Canadian criteria on whether to repair damaged longitudinal barrier. Barrier repair policies were obtained via comprehensive literature review and a survey of U.S. and Canadian transportation agencies. In an analysis of the maintenance procedures of 40 states in the United States and 8 Canadian transportation agencies, fewer than one-third of highway agencies were found to have quantitative measures to determine when barrier repair is warranted. In addition, no engineering basis for the current U.S. barrier repair guidelines could be found. These findings underscore the importance of the development of quantitative barrier repair guidelines based on a strong technical foundation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences under the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 22-23, “Criteria for Restoration of Longitudinal Barrier.” The writers wish to acknowledge the guidance of Charles W. Niessner, program manager for NCHRP Project 22-23, as well as the insight of the project panel.

References

Alabama Dept. of Transportation (ALDOT). (2005). Maintenance bureau field operations manual, Montgomery, Ala.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2007). Maintenance manual for roadways and bridges, 4th Ed., Washington, D.C.
California Dept. of Transportation (CADOT). (2006). Maintenance manual, Vol. I, Sacramento, Calif.
Elvik, R. (1995). “The safety value of guardrails and crash cushions: A meta-analysis of evidence from evaluation studies.” Accid. Anal Prev., 27(4), 523–549.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1990). “W-beam guardrail repair and maintenance: A guide for street and highway maintenance personnel.” FHwA-RT-90-001, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Florida Dept. of Transportation (FLDOT). (2007). Maintenance rating program handbook, Office of Maintenance, Tallahassee, Fla.
Idaho Transportation Dept. (IDTD). (2008). Maintenance manual, Boise, Id.
Indiana Dept. of Transportation (INDOT). (2001). Field operations manual, Indianapolis.
Indiana Dept. of Transportation (INDOT). (2006). Maintenance quality survey and OPI measures manual, Roadway Services/Traffic Division, Indianapolis.
Iowa Dept. of Transportation (IADOT). (2004). Maintenance performance measurement: Surveyor manual, Ames, Iowa.
Keller State of Illinois. (1982). 36 Illinois Court of Claims, 99.
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC). (2000). Maintenance rating program: Field data collection manual, Division of Operations, Frankfort, Ky.
Leonard v. Paxton Department of Highways. (1999). CC-98-250, West Virginia, Opinion issued December 6.
McDonald v. The State of New York, #002-019-004, Claim 103319. (2002). Opinion issued June 10.
Michie, J. D., and Bronstad, M. E. (1994). “Highway guardrails: Safety feature or roadside hazard?” Transportation Research Record. 1468, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–9.
Michigan Dept. of Transportation (MIDOT). (2004). Maintenance performance guide, Lansing, Mich.
Missouri Dept. of Transportation (MODOT). (2003). Maintenance quality assurance: Inspectors rating manual, Jefferson City, Mo.
Montana Dept. of Transportation (MTDOT). (2002a). Accountability for Montana’s maintenance operations (AMMO): Field data collection manual, Maintenance Division, Helena, Mont.
Montana Dept. of Transportation (MTDOT). (2002b). Maintenance operations and procedures manual, Helena, Mont.
North Carolina Dept. of Transportation (NCDOT). (1998). Maintenance condition survey manual, Operations Division, Raleigh, N.C.
North Carolina Dept. of Transportation (NCDOT). (2000). Guardrail installation and repair guidelines, Maintenance Unit, Raleigh, N.C.
North Carolina Dept. of Transportation (NCDOT). (2004) Maintenance Condition Rep. Division of Highways, Raleigh, N.C.
Nova Scotia Dept. of Transportation and Public Works. (2006). Road condition survey: Field data specifications, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Ohio Dept. of Transportation (OHDOT). (2004). Maintenance quality survey manual, Maintenance Division, Columbus, Ohio.
Ohio Dept. of Transportation (OHDOT). (2005). Maintenance administration manual, Vol. 2, Columbus, Ohio.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation. (2003). Maintenance manual: Maintenance quality standards, Toronto.
Oregon Dept. of Transportation (ORDOT). (2004). Maintenance guide, Salem, Ore.
Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation (PennDOT). (2006). “Shoulder and guide rail condition survey field manual.” Publication No. 33, Bureau of Maintenance and Operations, Harrisburg, Pa.
Quebec Ministry of Transport. (2004). “Standard 1501: Semi-rigid security barriers, Standard 1506: Flexible security barriers.” Quebec Ministry of Transport, Montreal.
Ray, M. H., and McGinnis, R. G. (1997). Synthesis of highway practice 244: Guardrail and median barrier crashworthiness, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Rosemary v. F. Woody Department of Highways. (1989). CC-87-44, (West Virginia, 1989) Opinion issued December 20.
Ross, H. E., Sicking, D. L., Zimmer, R. A., and Michie, J. D. (1993). “Recommended procedures for the safety performance evaluation of highway features.” NCHRP Rep. No. #350, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Short, D., and Robertson, L. S. (1998). “Motor vehicle death reductions from guardrail installation.” J. Transp. Eng., 124(5), 501–502.
South Carolina Dept. of Transportation (SCDOT). (2004). Maintenance assessment program manual, Columbia, S.C.
Utah Dept. of Transportation (UTDOT). (2004). Maintenance management quality assurance plus: Guide book, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Volpe v. The State of New York. (2000). #000-010-059, Claim 94964, Opinion Issued September 12.
Washington State Dept. of Transportation (WADOT). (2006). Maintenance accountability process: Field data collection manual, Maintenance Operations Division, Olympia, Wash.
Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation (WIDOT). (2004). Compass rating manual, Madison, Wis.
Wyoming Dept. of Transportation (WYDOT). (2006). Maintenance quality control program: manual, Cheyenne, Wyo.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135Issue 4April 2009
Pages: 225 - 234

History

Received: Dec 19, 2007
Accepted: Oct 21, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Douglas J. Gabauer [email protected]
Graduate Research Engineer, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, 100 F Randolph Hall, MC 0238, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0238. E-mail: [email protected]
Hampton C. Gabler [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, 100 F Randolph Hall, MC 0238, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0238. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share