Signalized Intersection Analysis and Design: Implications of Day-to-Day Variability in Peak-Hour Volumes on Delay
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 7
Abstract
Traffic signal timing plans are typically developed on the basis of turning movement traffic and pedestrian volume counts aggregated to 15-min intervals and obtained over a 4 or period on a single day. These data are used to identify the peak hour and to compute the peak-hour turning movement traffic volumes. They may also be used to compute the peak-hour factor. These values are then used as input to the analysis methods defined in the Highway capacity manual or within popular signal timing optimization software to estimate signal performance in terms of expected average vehicle delay. Delay estimation methods explicitly consider several sources of variability (e.g., an assumed distribution of individual vehicle headways in the arrival traffic stream). However, these methods do not consider the day-to-day variability that exists within key delay estimation parameters such as the PHF and peak-hour traffic volume. The lack of consideration of this variability may be because: (1) it is assumed that the impact of the variability is small; and/or (2) methods have not been developed by which the variability can be considered. This paper presents findings of a study that quantifies the impact of day-to-day variability of intersection peak-hour approach volumes on intersection delay and demonstrates that this impact is not insignificant and therefore should not be ignored. Finally, the study explores the number of days for which intersection approach volumes should be counted in order to establish intersection delay within a desired level of confidence. The results indicate that for intersections operating near capacity 3 days of peak-hour volume observations are required to estimate the average intersection delay with an estimation error of 50% of the true mean and 7 days of traffic counts are required to estimate intersection delay with an error of 30% of the true mean.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to acknowledge Mark Liddell from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Blair Lagden for providing the system detector data used in this study. The writers also wish to acknowledge the following agencies/organization that provided financial support for this project: Transport Canada, Urban Transportation Showcase Program; Regional Municipality of Waterloo; and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.NRC
References
Allsop, R. E. (1972). “Delay at a fixed time traffic signal. I: Theoretical analysis.” Transp. Sci., 6, 260–285.
Colyar, J. D., and Rouphail, N. M. (2003). “Measured distributions of control delay on signalized arterials.” Transportation Research Record. 1852, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–9.
Cronje, W. B. (1983). “Derivation of equations for queue length, stops, and delay for fixed-time traffic signals.” Transportation Research Record. 905, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Engelbrecht, R. J., Fambro, D. B., Rouphail, N. M., and Barkawi, A. A. (1997). “Validation of generalized delay model for oversaturated conditions.” Transportation Research Record. 1572, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 122–130.
Fu, L., and Hellinga, B. (2000). “Delay variability at signalized intersections.” Transportation Research Record. 1710, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 215–221.
Hurdle, V. F. (1984). “Signalized intersection delay models—A primer for the uninitiated.” Transportation Research Record. 971, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 96–105.
Kamarajugadda, A., and Park, B. (2003). “Stochastic traffic signal timing optimization.” Final Report of ITS Center Project: Signal Timing Algorithm for the Center for ITS Implementation Research, U.S. DOT University Transportation Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Center for Transportation Studies, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
Newell, G. F. (1982). Applications of queueing theory, University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Olszewski, P. (1993). “Modeling of queue probability distribution at traffic signals.” Transportation and traffic theory, M. Koshi, ed., Elsevier, New York.
Olszewski, P. (1994). “Modeling probability distribution of delay at signalized intersections.” J. Adv. Transp., 28(3), 253–274.
Sullivan, D., Levinson, H. S., Bryson, R. W. (2006). “Effects of urban traffic volume variations on service levels.” Proc., 85th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Paper No. 06-2381.
Teply, S., Allingham, D. I., Richardson, D. B., and Stephenson, B. W. (1995). Canadian capacity guide for signalized intersections, 2nd Ed., S. Teply, ed., Institute of Transportation Engineering, District 7, Toronto, Canada.
Teply, S., and Evans, G. D. (1989). “Evaluation of the quality of signal progression by delay distributions.” Transportation Research Record. 1225, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–7.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual, National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Webster, F. V. (1958). “Traffic signal settings.” Technical Paper No. 39, Road Research Laboratory, London.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 12, 2007
Accepted: Dec 17, 2007
Published online: Jul 1, 2008
Published in print: Jul 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.