Ordered Probit Modeling of User Perceptions of Protected Left-Turn Signals
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 3
Abstract
There is an absence of nationally accepted warrants for left-turn phasing at signalized intersections. Some guidelines recommend a protected left-turn phasing for turns with three or more opposing through lanes. However, there is no research that justifies this recommendation. A Web-based motorist survey was conducted to find how motorists perceive difficulty and their preference for protected left-turn signalization vis-à-vis the number of opposing lanes. The ordered probit modeling of 2,017 responses suggests that driver perception of difficulty to make turns without protected left-turn signals increases with intersection size. As high as 91% of the respondents stated that they much or extremely prefer a protected left-turn signal at an intersection where left-turn vehicles have to cross three lanes of opposing through traffic. The ordered probit models also provide indications of the effects of various sociological variables on the probabilities of driver perceptions of difficulty and preference. The estimated models provide a sensitive tool for making decisions about the left turn treatment at signalized intersections.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Agent, K. R. (1979). “Warrants for left-turn signal phasing.” Transportation Research Record. 737, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–10.
Agent, K. R. (1987). “Guidelines for the use of protected/permissive left-turn phasing.” ITE J., 7, 57, 37–42.
Asante, S. A., Ardekani, S. A., and Williams, J. C. (1993). “Selection criteria for left-turn phasing and indication sequence.” Transportation Research Record. 1421, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 11–20.
Brehmer, C. L., Kacir, K. C., Noyce, D. A., and Manser, M. P. (2003). “Evaluation of traffic signal display for protected/permissive left-turn control.” NCHRP Rep. No. 493, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Cottrell, B. H. (1986). “Guidelines for protected/permissive left-turn signal phasing.” Transportation Research Record. 1069, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 54–61.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2003). Manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD), DOT, Washington, D.C.
Greene, W. H. (2002). LIMDEP version 8.0, econometric modeling guide, Econometric Software, Plainview, N.Y.
Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
ITE Florida Section. (1982). “Left turn phase design in Florida.” ITE J., 52(9), 28–35.
Kell, J. H., and Fullerton I. J. (1991). Manual of traffic signal design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Lalani, N., Cronin, D., Hattan, D., and Searls, T. (1986). “A summary of the use of warrants for the installation of left-turn phasing at signalized intersections.” ITE J., 56(4), 57–59.
McShane, W. R., and Roess, R. P. (1990). Traffic engineering, Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Stamatiadis, N., Agent, K. R., and Bizakis, A. (1997). “Guidelines for left-turn phasing treatment.” Transportation Research Record. 1605, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–7.
Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice with simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual (HCM), Washington, D.C.
Upchurch, J. E. (1986). “Guidelines for selecting type of left-turn phasing.” Transportation Research Record. 1069, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 30–38.
Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., and Mannering, F. L. (2003). “Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis.” Capman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
Zavoina, R., and McElvey (1975). “A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables.” J. Math. Sociol., Summer, 103–210.
Zhang, L. (2004). “Signalized intersection level-of-service that accounts for user perceptions.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu.
Zhang, L., and Prevedouros, P. D. (2003). “Signalized intersection LOS that accounts for accident risk.” Transportation Research Record. 1852, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 77–86.
Zhang, L., and Prevedouros, P. D. (2004). “How do you rate intersections with traffic lights?” Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM), Honolulu, ⟨http://www.eng.hawaii.edu/~panos/Survey_Form.pdf⟩ (February 25, 2006).
Zhang, L., and Prevedouros, P. D. (2005). “User perceptions of signalized intersection level of service.” 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper No. 05-1887, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 3 • March 2007
Pages: 205 - 214
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 27, 2006
Accepted: Jul 26, 2006
Published online: Mar 1, 2007
Published in print: Mar 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.