TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2006

Evaluation of the Trans-Texas Corridor Proposal: Application and Enhancements of the Random-Utility-Based Multiregional Input–Output Model1

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 7

Abstract

The Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) projects a vision of 6,400 centerline km of new roadways and railways, intended to provide a faster, safer and more reliable means of transport for people and freight, while fostering economic growth of Texas’s rural regions. This work enhances and then applies a random-utility-based multiregional input–output model to assess project impacts on trade, production, and worker locations. Driven by foreign exports and domestic demands, the enhanced model endogenously generates monetary trade flows for 18 economic sectors across Texas’ 254 counties, equilibrating explicit labor and land markets, along with capacity-constrained networks. The model predicts a slight redistribution of economic activities, increasing the supremacy of counties located closer to export zones, and an 8% reduction in the traffic volumes on existing highways. It also suggests a greater diversification of economic activity/production and moderate changes in the distribution of wages, floorspace rents and population, following the production trends. These effects are most noticeable in counties traversed by the TTC, especially in those previously inadequately connected to the State’s transportation network.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF9984541. The writers wish to thank the National Science FoundationNSF CAREER Award program, as well as those who provided software, data, and information. These include Howard Slavin (Caliper Corporation), Mark Horner (from Southwest Texas State University), José Holguín-Veras (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), Bruce Lambert (FHwA), John Abraham (University of Calgary), Robert Harrison (University of Texas’ Center for Transportation Research), Michael Oden (University of Texas’ Department of Community and Regional Planning), Annette Perrone (for her editing assistance), and Victor Chan (undergraduate research assistant).

References

Abraham, J. E., and Hunt, J. D. (1993). “Firm location in the MEPLAN model of Sacramento.” Transportation Research Record. 1685, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 187–197.
Anas, A., and Xu, R. (1999). “Congestion, land use, and job dispersion: A general equilibrium model.” J. Urban Econ., 45(3), 454–473.
Brocker, J. (1998). “Operational spatial computable general equilibrium modeling.” Ann. Reg. Sci., 32(3), 367–387.
Buckley, P. H., and Patrick, H. (1992). “A transportation-oriented interregional computable general model of the United States.” Ann. Reg. Sci., 26(4), 331–349.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2000a). “Occupational employment statistics (OES). Occupational employments and wages.” ⟨http://www.bls.gov/oes/⟩ (January 2003).
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2000b). “Quarterly census of employment and wages (QCEW). Annual data for 1997–2000.” ⟨http://www.bls.gov/cew/cewnote.htm⟩ (July 2004).
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). (2001). “1997 commodity flow survey data.” (CD-ROM), BTS, Washington, D.C.
Caliper. (2000). TransCAD users' guide, Caliper Corporation, Newton, Mass.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO). (1998). “1996 traffic volumes—Austin metropolitan area.” ⟨http://www.ci.autin.tx.us/ats/trvol96.htm⟩ (Jan. 2003).
De la Barra, T. (1995). Integrated land use and transport modeling: Decision chains and hierarchies, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Echenique, M. H. (1985). “The use of integrated land use transportation planning models: The cases of Sao Paolo, Brazil and Bilbao, Spain.” M. Florian, ed., The practice of transportation planning, Elsevier, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Ham, H. J., Kim, T. J., and Boyce, D. E. (2000). “Implementation of a combined trip generation, mode choice, flow distribution, and route choice model for interregional commodity flows.” Proc., 4th Annual Meeting of the North American Regional Science Association, November 9–11, Chicago.
Horst, T., and Moore, A. (2003). “Industrial diversity, economic development, and highway investment in Louisiana.” Transportation Research Record. 1839, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 136–141.
Hunt, J. D., and Abraham, J. E. (2003). “Design and application of the PECAS land use modeling system.” Proc., 8th Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Conf., Sendai, Japan.
Hunt, J. D., Donelly, R., Abraham, J. E., Batten, C., Freedman, J., Hicks, J., Costinett, P. J., and Upton, W. J. (2001). “Design of a statewide land use transport interaction model for oregon.” Proc., World Conf. on Transportation Research, Tranportation Research Society, Seoul, South Korea.
Hunt, J. D., and Echenique, M. H. (1993). “Experiences in the application of the MEPLAN framework for land use and transportation interaction modeling.” Proc., 4th National Conf. on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Daytona Beach, Fla., 723–754.
Hunt, J. D., and Simmonds, D. C. (1993). “Theory and application of an integrated land-use and transport modeling framework.” Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des., 20, 221–244.
Ivanova, O. (2002). “The role of transport infrastructure in regional economic development: A spatial general equilibrium model incorporating explicit representation of transport network.” ⟨http://www.infra.kth.se/tlenet/meet6/papers/Ivanova1.pdf⟩ (January 2003).
Izard, W., Azis, I. J., Drennan, M. P., Miller, R. E., Saltzman, S., and Thorbecke, E. (1998). Methods of interregional and regional analysis, Ashgate, Burlington, Vt.
Janvry, A., and Sadoulet, E. (2002). “Poverty and the role of agricultural technology: Direct and indirect effects.” J. Dev. Studies, 38(2), 1–26.
Kim, E., Hewings, J. G. D., and Hong, C. (2002). “An application of integrated transport network-multiregional CGE model I: A framework for economic analysis of highway project.” Proc., 49th Annual North American Meetings of the Int. Regional Science Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Kim, T. J., Boyce, D. E., and Hewings, G. J. D. (1983). “Combined input-output and commodity flow models for interregional development planning: Insight from a Korean application.” Geogr. Anal., 15(4), 330–342.
Kockelman, K. M., Jin, L., Zhao, Y., and Ruiz-Juri, N. (2005). “Tracking land use, transport, and industrial production using random-utility-based multizonal input-output models: Applications for Texas trade.” J. Transp. Geogr., 13, 275–286.
Klein, L. R. (1952). “On the interpretation of professor Leontief’s system.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 20, 131–136.
Krishnamurthy, S., and Kockelman, K. M. (2003). “Propagation of uncertainty in transportation land use models: An investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTPP predictions in Austin, Texas.” Transportation Research Record. 1831, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 219–229.
Leontief, W., and Strout, A. (1963). “Multiregional input-output analysis.” Structural interdependence and economic development, T. De la Barna, ed., McMillan, London.
Logfren, H. (2001). “A CGE model for Malawi: Technical documentation.” TMD Discussion Paper No. 70, ⟨http://www.ifpri.org/divs/tmd/dp/tmdp70.htm⟩ (January 2003).
Logfren, H., and Robinson, S. (1999). “Spatial networks in multiregion computable general equilibrium models.” ⟨http://www.ifpri.org/divs/tmd/dp/papers/tmdp35.pdf⟩ (January 2003).
Luton, J. D. (1980). “Feasibility study for a passenger high-speed rapid rail or ground system for major Texas intercity travel corridors.” Professional Rep., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
McFadden, D. (1978). “Modeling the choice of residential location.”Spatial interaction theory and planning models, A. Karlqvist et al., eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Miyagi, T. (2001). “Economic appraisal for multiregional impacts by a large scale expressway project.” ⟨http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/uvatin/20010066.html⟩ (January 2003).
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). (1996). “The Oak Ridge energy crop county level database.” ⟨http://bioenergy.ornl.gov/pubs/index.html⟩ (May 2004).
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., and Urban Analytics, Inc. (1997). “Developing land market data for use in a state wide land use and transportation model.” National Transportation Library Record No. 3051, ⟨http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/3000/3000/3051/p2t22fnl.pdf⟩ (January 2003).
Rey, S., and Dev, B. (1997). “Integrating econometric and input-output models in a multiregional context.” Growth Change, 28(2), 222–243.
Rose, A. (1984). “Technological change and input-output analysis: An appraisal.” Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 18(5), 305–318.
Ruiz Juri, N. (2004). “Application and enhancements of the random-utility-based multiregional input-output model.” Master’s thesis, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Saito, M. (1971). “An interindustry study of price formation.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 53(1), 11–25.
Shoven, J. B., and Whalley, J. (1984). “Applied general equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey.” J. Econom. Lit., 22(3), 1007–1051.
Southworth, F. (1995). “A technical review of urban land use—Transportation models as tools for evaluating vehicle travel reduction strategies.” ⟨http://tmip.tamu.edu⟩ (May 2004).
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2002). “Crossroads of the Americas: Trans Texas corridor plan.” ⟨http://www.dot.state.tx.us/ttc/ttc_home.htm⟩ (July 2004).
Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). (2003). “Regional water plan. Regional and state total population projections for 2000–2060.” ⟨http://www.twdb.state.tx.us/data/powpwaterdemand/2003Projections/Population%20Projections/STATE_REGIONS/State_region_Pop.htm⟩ (January 2003).
Thompson, R. (1997). “Industrial employment densities.” J. Real Estate Res., 14(3), 309–319.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). “Census 2000 briefs and special reports: Households and families:2000.” ⟨http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/briefs.html⟩ (July 2003).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). “Census 2000 county-to-county worker flow files.” ⟨http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/commuting.html⟩ (July 2002).
Wheaton, W. C., and DiPasquale, D. (1992). “The markets for real estate assets and space: A conceptual framework.” J. Am. Real Estate Urban Econ. Assoc., 20(1), 181–197.
Zhao, Y., and Kockelman, K. M. (2004). “Spatial input-output models: Formulation and solution uniqueness.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 38(9), 789–807.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132Issue 7July 2006
Pages: 531 - 539

History

Received: Dec 7, 2004
Accepted: May 5, 2005
Published online: Jul 1, 2006
Published in print: Jul 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2005, Washington D.C.

Authors

Affiliations

Natalia Ruiz Juri [email protected]
Graduate Student Researcher, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 6.9 E. Cockrell Jr. Hall, Austin, TX 78712-1076. E-mail: [email protected]
Kara M. Kockelman [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and William J. Murray Jr. Fellow, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 6.9 E. Cockrell Jr. Hall, Austin, TX 78712-1076 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share