Evaluating the Safety Risk of Narrow Medians Using Reliability Analysis
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 5
Abstract
In British Columbia, many highways are located in mountainous terrain and the costs of highway construction in these areas are high. One method of controlling construction costs is narrow medians but the safety consequences of using narrow medians were never determined. Recent research on safety in geometric design has focused on establishing quantitative relationships between collisions and cross-sectional elements using collision prediction models (CPMs) and collision modification factors (CMFs). In some situations, such as the use of narrow medians, it is difficult to find CPMs and CMFs that adequately describe the design scenario. In other instances, it is difficult to measure the safety in terms of collision reduction because of a lack of data or difficulty isolating the impact of a single design element on collision frequency. In these situations, reliability analysis can be used to evaluate the risk associated with a particular design feature. Reliability analysis is not intended as an alternative to quantify safety using collision frequency but represents a complementary method of measuring safety in terms of risk. In this paper, reliability analysis was completed on a series of horizontal curves with varying horizontal sight distance restrictions and the probability of being unable to stop within the available sight distance was calculated. The results of the study found that narrow medians combined with tight horizontal curves did not provide sufficient sight distance that vehicles would be expected to stop if an object was in a vehicle’s path. The analysis was applied to a case study of two constrained alignments in mountainous terrain of British Columbia.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2001). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets 2001, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Ang, A., and Tang, W. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering and design, Wiley, New York.
Davis, G., Sanderson, A., and Davuluri, S. (2002). “Development and testing of a vehicle/pedestrian collision model for neighborhood traffic control.” Final Rep. 2002-23, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn.
Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T., MacGregor, J., and Cornell, C. (1980). Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
Fambro, D., Koppa, R., Picha, D., and Fitzpatrick, K. (2000). “Driver braking performance in stopping sight distance situations.” Transportation Research Record 1701, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 9–16.
Fancher, P., and Gillespie, T. (1997). Synthesis of highway practice 241 truck operating characteristics, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2000). “Speed prediction for two-lane rural highways.” Publication No. 99-171, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Felipe, E. (1996). “Reliability-based design for highway horizontal curves.” Master’s thesis, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Fitzpatrick, K., and Wooldridge, M. (2001). “Recent geometric design research for improved safety and operations.” Synthesis 299, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Foschi, R., Li, H., Folz, B., Yao, F., and Zhang, J. (2002). Reliability analysis software version 6.0, user’s manual, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Hauer, E. (1999). “Safety and the choice of degree of curve.” Transportation Research Record 1665, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 22–27.
Haukaas, T. (2005). “Civil 518 class notes.” Univ. of British Columbia, ⟨http://www.civil.ubc.ca/faculty/THaukaas/civl518.html⟩ (May 2005).
Islam, M., and Seneiratne, P. (1994). “Evaluation of design consistency on two-lane highways.” Inst. Transp. Eng. J., 64(2), 28–31.
Kanellaidis, G., Golias, J., and Efstathiadis, S. (1990). “Driver’s speed behaviour on rural road curves.” Traffic Eng. Control, 31(7/8), 414–415.
Lamm, R., and Choueiri, E. (1987). “Recommendations for evaluating horizontal design consistency based on investigations in the state of New York.” Transportation Research Record 1122, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 68–78.
Lamm, R., Choueiri, E., and Hayward, J. (1988). “Tangent as an independent design element.” Transportation Research Record 1195, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 123–131.
Lamm, R., Psarianos, B., and Mailaender, T. (1999). Highway design and traffic safety engineering handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Lerner, N. (1995). “Age and driver perception-reaction time for sight distance design requirements.” 1995 ITE compendium of technical papers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 624–628.
Lovell, D., Jong, J., and Chang, P. (2001). “Improvements to sight distance algorithm.” J. Transp. Eng., 127(4), 283–288.
Melchers, R. (1999). Structural reliability analysis and probability, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Morrall, J., and Talarico, R. (1994). “Side friction demanded and margins of safety on horizontal curves.” Transportation Research Record 1435, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 145–152.
Ng, J., and Sayed, T. (2003). “Quantifying the relationship between geometric design consistency and road safety.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 31(2), 218–227.
Olsen, P., Cleveland, D., Franchee, P., Kostyniuk, L., and Schneider, L. (1984). “Parameters affecting stopping sight distance.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program 270, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Ottesen, J., and Krammes, R. (2000). “Speed-profile model for a design-consistency evaluation procedure in the United States.” Transportation Research Record 1701, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 76–85.
Transportation Association of Canada (TAC). (1999). Geometric design guide for Canadian roads, TAC, Ottawa (updates published in 2002).
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1998). “Managing speed review of current practice for setting and enforcing speed limits.” Special Rep. 25, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Transportation Research Institute Oregon State Univ. (2002). “Stopping sight distance and decision sight distance for the Oregon Department of Transportation.” Discussion Paper No. 8A, Oregon State Univ., Salem, Ore.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132 • Issue 5 • May 2006
Pages: 366 - 375
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 17, 2005
Accepted: Aug 31, 2005
Published online: May 1, 2006
Published in print: May 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.