Lessons Learned on Jointed Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies in Texas
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 3
Abstract
Reflective cracking through jointed concrete pavement overlays has been a persistent problem. Several different rehabilitation strategies have been used in Texas. This paper is a summary of the performance of strategies used in the past 10 years. The performance of the crack-retarding grid has been disappointing as it has been related to several premature failures. Only one project has realized a benefit of the crack-retarding grid, where the reflective cracking was delayed by about 1 year. The writers believe the small openings in the crack-retarding grid and the lack of an effective bond may be the causes of the layer separation. A proprietary crack-retarding asphalt material has been performing well over two years of monitoring. In one experimental project, 100% of the cracks reflected through conventional overlay material in the first year. Both Petromat fabric underseal and crack-retarding asphalt material have been performing satisfactorily to retard reflective cracking. However, there is a large cost difference between these two treatments. Seven experimental treatments on a major section of US 59 were evaluated. The worst-performing section on the US 59 project was the break-and-seat method, which failed due to weak subgrade support. The weak subgrade is unable to support cracked concrete, which leads to a rocking action under traffic loads. It is concluded that for future projects, the break-and-seat method should not be applied on subgrade with a dynamic cone penetrometer penetration rate exceeding 25 mm per blow. A flexible base overlay with thin asphalt surfacing and the Arkansas (large stone) mix have performed well. Flexible base overlays were able to absorb the joint movement and eliminate the reflective cracking. The flexible base should be of top quality with very low moisture susceptibility. In Texas, this involves specifying a Texas triaxial Class 1 material with classification of “good” in suction/dielectric tests. It is also critical to provide an effective seal for the flexible base. A chip seal followed by a thin 75-mm hot mix layer is recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work could not have been completed without the assistance of Richard Williammee, Darlene Goehl, Andrew Wimsatt, Charles Gaskin, Susan Chu, Jack Moser, Abbas Mehdibeigi, Ricky Boles, and Mike Murphy of TxDOT.
References
Blankenship, J., Iker, N., and Drbohlav, J. (2003). Interlayer and design considerations to retard reflective cracking, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Cho, Y. H., Weissmann, J., and McCullough, B. F. (1995). “Initial performance of asphalt overlays on overlaid jointed concrete pavement (JCP) and on flexible pavements in the field test sections in Lufkin.” Rep. 987-4, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Guthrie, W. S., and Scullion, T. (2002). “Tube suction test—Interim report and recommendations.” Research Rep. 4114-2, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex.
Huang, Y. (1993). Pavement analysis and design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Moody, E. D. (1995). “Field investigation of selected strategies to reduce reflective cracking in asphalt concrete overlays constructed over existing jointed concrete pavements.” Transportation Research Record 1449, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Pais, J., Sousa, J., Way, G., and Stubstad, R. (2000). “An overlay design method for reflective cracking.” Proc., Asphalt Rubber 2000 Conference, Consulpav International, Calif.
Scullion, T. (2004) “Performance report on joint concrete pavement repair strategies in Texas.” Research Rep. 4517-1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2004). Standard specifications for construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and bridges, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 26, 2004
Accepted: Jul 22, 2005
Published online: Mar 1, 2006
Published in print: Mar 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.