TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 1, 2006

Screening Tools for Considering Grade Separation at Rail-Highway Crossings

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 1

Abstract

At-grade rail-highway crossings lead to economic losses due to vehicle delays and train-vehicle collisions. To consider the need and priorities for grade separation at crossings, screening tools are required. Such tools were developed in the study based on detailed field measurements at 20 representative sites and following the analysis of all crossings’ accident and inventory data for 5 years. The tools consist of a safety model, a formula for estimating the economic loss due to vehicle delays at a crossing, and a qualification criterion. The screening applies economic principles, comparing the economic loss due to an at-grade crossing with the average cost of grade separation. Applying the tools to all existing Israeli crossings, in the year 2000, 30 sites out of 216 were found as warranting grade separation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alroth, W. A. (1997). “USDOT—TWG recommendations on rail-highway grade crossing safety.” Proc., ITE 67th Annual Meeting (CD-Rom), Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.
Association of Engineers and Architects in Israel (AEAI). (2000). “Traffic and Transportation Engineers.” Traffic Transp., 61 (in Hebrew).
Bell, C. A., Hunter-Zaworski, K. M., and Zaworski, D. D. (1997). “Low volume highway-rail crossing treatments for the Oregon high speed rail corridor.” Rep. No FHWA-OR-RD-97-08, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore.
European Transport Safety Council (ETSC). (1997). Transport accident costs and the value of safety.
Faghri, A., and Demetsky, M. J. (1987). “A comparison of formulae for predicting rail-highway crossing hazards.” Transportation Research Record 1114, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 152–155.
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (1994). “Highway-railroad grade crossings: A guide to crossing consolidation and closure.” Paper No. 1994/07, FRA, Washington, D.C.
Gitelman, V., and Hakkert, A. S. (1997). “The evaluation of road-rail crossing safety with limited accident statistics.” Accid. Anal Prev., 29(2), 171–179.
Gitelman, V., Hakkert, A. S., Doveh, E., and Cohen, A. (2001). “A study of safety effects of road infrastructure improvements under Israeli conditions.” Proc., Int. Conf. Traffic Safety on Three Continents, Moscow (CD-Rom), Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linkoping, Sweden.
Hakkert, A. S., and Gitelman, V. (1997). “Development of evaluation tools for road-rail crossing consideration for grade separation.” Transportation Research Record 1605, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 96–105.
Hauer, E. (1997). Observational before-after studies in road safety, Pergamon, New York.
Hauer, E., and Persaud, B. N. (1987). “How to estimate the safety of rail-highway grade crossings and the safety effects of warning devices.” Transportation Research Record 1114, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 131–140.
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). (1993). “Light rail transit grade separation guidelines.” ITE J., 63, 38–40.
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). (1998). “Europe’s approach to rail crossing safety.” ITE J., 68, 18.
Israeli Institute for Transport Planning (IITP). (1993). Data files for economic analyses of transport projects, IITP, Tel-Aviv, Israel (in Hebrew).
Israel Ministry of Transport (IMOT). (1996). A recommended procedure for economic evaluation of transport projects, 2.0 Ed., IMOT, Israel (in Hebrew).
Katz, A., and Guttmann, L. (1991). “Considerations for grade separation of road-rail crossings (A guideline and literature survey).” Rep. No. 91-132, Transportation Research Institute, Technion, Haifa, Israel (in Hebrew).
Maycock, G., and Summersgill, I. (1995). “Methods for investigating the relationship between accidents, road user behavior and road design standards.” Annex III to Report Safety effects of road design standards R-94-7, SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Mutabazi, M. I., and Berg, W. D. (1995). “Evaluation of accuracy of USDOT rail-highway grade crossing accident prediction models.” Transportation Research Record 1495, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 166–170.
Nichelson, G. R., and Reed, G. L. (2000). “A procedure for the provision of highway-railroad grade separation.” Proc., 79th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board (CD-Rom), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Roper, B. A., and Keltner, D. M. (1999). “User benefits of railroad grade separation in a small community: Practical techniques for applying MICROBENCOST.” Proc., 6th National Conf. on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium-sized Communities (CD-Rom), Washington State Department of Transportation, Spokane, Wash.
Ryan, T. A. (1990). “Roadway vehicle delay costs at rail-highway grade crossings.” Transportation Research Record 1262 Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 31–38.
Taggart, R. C., et al. (1987). “Evaluating grade-separated rail and highway crossing alternatives.” NCHRP Rep. 288, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Tustin, B. H., Richards, H., McGee, H., and Patterson, R. (1986). “Railroad-highway grade crossing handbook.” Rep. No. FHWA TS-86-215, Federal Highway Administration, Springfield, Va.
United States General Accounting Office (USGAO). (1995). “Status of efforts to improve railroad crossing safety.” Rep. No. GAO-RCED-95-191, USGAO, Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). “DOT funds grade crossing programs.” (1999). Public Roads, 63, 52.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132Issue 1January 2006
Pages: 52 - 59

History

Received: May 8, 2003
Accepted: Jun 20, 2005
Published online: Jan 1, 2006
Published in print: Jan 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Victoria Gitelman [email protected]
Senior Research Associate, Transportation Research Institute, Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
A. Shalom Hakkert
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Etti Doveh
Research Associate, The Technion Statistics Laboratory, Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Ayala Cohen
Associate Professor, Head of the Technion Statistics Laboratory, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share