Modified Guidelines for Left-Turn Lane Geometry at Intersections
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 9
Abstract
Left-turn vehicles need sufficient sight distance to decide when it is safe to turn left and cross the lane(s) used by the opposing traffic. The current policy of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) recommends that the adequacy of sight distance for left-turn vehicles should be checked because the opposing left-turn vehicles can block a driver’s view of the oncoming traffic. Previous studies have established guidelines for various intersection geometric elements (offset between opposing left-turn lanes, left-turn lane length, and left-turn lane-line width) to ensure that adequate sight distance is provided for left-turn vehicles. However, these guidelines are based on overestimation of the available sight distance. This results in underestimating the requirements for intersection elements. This paper develops modified analytical models and guidelines for various intersection elements, based on the actual available sight distance. The median opening is also introduced as a variable in the models. The results show that the existing guidelines for minimum offset and left-turn lane length are inadequate generally at low and high speeds, differing from the modified guidelines by more than 100 and 15%, respectively. The existing guidelines for minimum lane-line width are also inadequate for low percentiles (by at an offset of ). The modified guidelines ensure that the adequate sight distance for left-turn vehicles is provided at intersections, and therefore should be of interest to traffic and geometric design engineers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The study is supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The writers are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their thorough and most helpful comments.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1984). A policy on geometric design of highway and streets, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2001). A policy on geometric design of highway and streets, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Easa, S. M. (1998). “Model for sight distance analysis of uncontrolled intersections.” J. Transp. Eng., 124(2), 156–162.
Easa, S. M. (2000). “Reliability approach to intersection sight distance.” Transportation Research Record 1701, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C., 42–52.
Easa, S. M., Dabbour, E., and Ali, M. Z. A. (2004). “Three-dimensional model for stop-control intersection sight distance.” J. Transp. Eng., 130(2), 261–270.
Fitzpatrick, K., and Wooldridge, M. (2001). “Recent geometric design research for improved safety and operations.” NCHRP Synthesis 299, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Harwood, D., Mason, J., Brydia, R., Pietrucha, M., and Grittings, G. L. (1996). “Intersection sight distance.” NCHRP 383, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Joshua, S. C., and Saka, A. A. (1992). “Mitigation of sight distance problem for unprotected left-turning traffic at intersections.” Transportation Research Record 1356, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Mason, J. M., Jr., Fitzpatrick, K., and Harwood, D. W. (1989). “Intersection sight distance requirements for large trucks.” Transportation Research Record 1208, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 47–58.
McCoy, P. T., Byrd, P. S., and Pesti, G. (1999a). “Pavement markings to improve opposing left-turn lane sight distance.” Final Report, Nebraska Department of Roads Project No. STPP-STWD(36), City of Lincoln Project No. 700791.
McCoy, P. T., Byrd, P. S., Pesti, G., and Singh, V. A. (1999b). “Improving sight distance from opposing left-turn lanes.” Transportation frontiers for the next millenium (CD-ROM), 69th Annual Meeting of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Las Vegas.
McCoy, P. T., Navarro, U. R., and Witt, W. E. (1992). “Guidelines for offsetting opposing left-turn lanes on four-lane divided roadways.” Transportation Research Record 1356, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 28–36.
McCoy, P. T., Pesti, G., Byrd, P. S., and Singh, V. A. (2001). “Guidelines for opposing left-turn lane-line widths.” Transportation Research Record 1751, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 26–34.
McGee, H. W., Rizzo, R. S., and Tustin, B. (1984). “Highway design and operations standards affected by vehicle characteristics.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-86-044, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Staplin, L., Lococo, K., Byington, S., and Harkey, D. (2001). “Guidelines and recommendations to accommodate older drivers and pedestrians.” Final Rep. FHWA-RD-01-051, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Staplin, L., and Lyles, R. W. (1991). “Age differences in motion perception and specific traffic maneuver problems.” Transportation Research Record 1325, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 23–33.
Tarawneh, M. S., and McCoy, P. T. (1997). “Guidelines for offsetting opposing left-turn lanes on divided roadways.” Transportation Research Record 1579, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 43–52.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 25, 2004
Accepted: Nov 16, 2004
Published online: Sep 1, 2005
Published in print: Sep 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.