The Road Ahead
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 5
Abstract
Our road safety future is shaped by decisions that affect the amount of trip making, mode of travel used, kinds of infrastructure on which travel takes place, vehicle fleet, technology in use, and the prevailing norms of behavior. While in the past most such decisions were based on intuition and judgement, there is an obvious trend toward decisions based on fact and science. This transition from a “pragmatic” to a more “rational” style of road safety management is hungry for factual knowledge and for professionals to be its purveyors. Consequently, a broad class of professionals, those who influence the future of road safety, needs to be trained in what fact-based road safety knowledge exists. In addition, a vibrant, competent community of road-safety researchers has to be created. They need to be trained in the same road safety knowledge as well as in research methods. Above all they need to be freed from the constraints imposed on them by a myopic class of research administrators. The best interest of society is to move toward the gradual establishment of the rational style of road safety management; it is the engineer’s professional obligation to promote this societal interest.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1998). AASHTO strategic highway safety plan, Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2001). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2000). MUTCD 2000, Manual on uniform traffic control devices, Washington, D.C.
Harwood, D. (2002). “Draft work plan.” Comprehensive highway safety improvement model, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Ks.
Harwood, D., Council F. M., Hauer, E., Hughes W. E., and Vogt A. (2000). “Prediction of the expected safety performance or rural two-lane highways.” FHWA-RD-99-207, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Hauer, E. (2000a). “Safety in geometric design standards I: Three anecdotes.” Proc., 2nd International Symp. of Highway Geometric Design, R. Krammes and W. Brillon, eds., Forshungsgeselschaft für Strassen und Verkehrsvesen e.V., Köln, Germany 11–23.
Hauer, E. (2000b). “Safety in geometric design standards II: Rift, roots and reform.” Proc., 2nd International Symp. of Highway Geometric Design, R. Krammes and W. Brillon, eds., Forshungsgeselschaft für Strassen und Verkehrsvesen e.V., Köln, Germany 24–35.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2002). “Incorporating safety into long-range transportation planning (Active).” NCHRP 8-44,
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2003). “Prepare Parts I and II of the Highway Safety Manual (Anticipated),” NCHRP 17-27,
Transportation Association of Canada (TAC). (1999). Geometric design guide for Canadian roads, Ottawa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 131 • Issue 5 • May 2005
Pages: 333 - 339
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 5, 2004
Accepted: Jul 21, 2004
Published online: May 1, 2005
Published in print: May 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.