Calibration of Capacity Parameters for Signalized Intersections in Indiana
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 12
Abstract
Past research has indicated that the accuracy of traffic quality studies strongly depends on capacity parameters, particularly when demand approaches capacity. Minimal work has been done in the past on local values of the base saturation flow rate and lost times used in capacity analysis of signalized intersections. This paper discusses saturation flow studies conducted for Indiana. The results confirm that the default parameters recommended by the Highway Capacity Manual, such as the heavy vehicle equivalency factor and the protected left-turn adjustment factor, are adequate for Indiana. At the same time, the base saturation flow rate was found to vary strongly across locations, even when the geometry and traffic conditions were nearly identical, indicating that there are other factors not yet included in the Highway Capacity Manual. Regression analysis of the saturation flow rate variability identified the size of a town to be a good predictor. A model was developed and a set of base saturation flow rates were proposed, which depend on the number of lanes and the town population. The estimated impact of the size of the town estimated for Indiana is very close to the values obtained in the past for other states. The paper provides a convincing argument for adding to the Highway Capacity Manual a population adjustment factor for saturation flow rates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Joint Transportation Research Program administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration and the Indiana Department of Transportation, nor do the contents constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
References
Agent, K. R. and Crabtree, J. D. (1982). “Analysis of Saturation Flow at Signalized Intersections.” Kentucky Transportation Program, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.
Bonneson, J., and Messer, C. (1997). “Phase capacity characteristics for signalized interchange and intersection approaches.” 77th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Branston, D., and Gipps, P., (1981). “Some experiences with multiple regression method estimating parameters at the traffic departure process,” Transp. Res., Part A, 16A, 445–458.
Dowling, R. (1994). “Use of default parameters for estimating signalized intersection level of service.” Transportation Res. Rec. No. 11457, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 82–95.
Greenshields, B. D., Shapiro, D. and Ericksen, E. L., (1947). “Traffic performance at urban intersections.” Technical Rep. No. 1, Bureau of Highway Traffic, Yale Univ., New Haven, Conn.
Khatib, Z. and Kyte, M. (2000). “Framework to consider the effect of uncertainty in forecasting the level of service of signalized and unsignalized intersections.” 4th Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity, Hawaii, June 27–July 1, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Kimber, R. M., McDonald, M., and Hounsell, N. B. (1985). “Passenger car units in saturation flows: concepts, definition, derivation.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 1B, 39–61.
Le, X., Lu, J. J., Mierzejewski, E. A., and Zhou, Y. (2000). “Variations of capacity at signalized intersections with different area types.” Paper Presented at 79th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Perez-Cartagena, R. I., and Tarko, A. P. (2004).
SAS Institute. (1990). SAS User’s Guide. Version 6, 4th Ed., SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.
Stokes, W. R., Stover, V. G., and Messer, C. J. (1986). “Use and effectiveness of simple linear regression to estimate saturation flows at signalized intersections.” Transportation Res. Rec. No. 1091, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 95–100.
Tarko, A. P., and Tracz, M. (2000). “Uncertainty in saturation flow predictions.” 4th Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity, Hawaii, June 27–July 1, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Tarko, A., and Songchitruksa, P. (2001). “Handling and reporting uncertainty in the highway capacity manual—Survey results.” Paper Presented to the Transportation Research Board A110 Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Traffic, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Transportation and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL). (1963). “A method of measuring saturation flow at traffic signals. Road Note No. 34, TRRL, London.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual, Special Report 209, National Research Council, TRB, Washington, D.C.
Zegeer, J. D. (1986). “Field validation of intersection capacity factors.” Transportation Res. Rec. No. 1091, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 67–77.
Zhou, Y., Lu, J. J., Mierzejewski, E. A., and Le, X. (2000). “Development of driver population factors for capacity analysis of signalized intersections.” Paper Presented at 79th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 131 • Issue 12 • December 2005
Pages: 904 - 911
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 8, 2004
Accepted: Mar 11, 2005
Published online: Dec 1, 2005
Published in print: Dec 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.