Queuing and Statistical Analysis of Freeway Bottleneck Formation
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 6
Abstract
A modified approach to treat traffic flow parameters (flow, density, and speed) has been introduced in this paper. A queuing analysis has been conducted on traffic flow data on Interstate 94 in the Minneapolis–St. Paul metro area. A methodology has been developed to calibrate loop detector count data. Corrected flow data has been subjected to analysis using queuing analysis to compute densities and speeds on freeway sections. Statistical analysis identifies “active bottleneck” locations on freeways and sections where bottlenecks occur because of disturbances caused by downstream bottlenecks propagating backwards in the form of shockwaves. A sample of 6 days on Interstate 94 was considered for the analysis. Our analysis reveals that the same section cannot always be characterized as a “bottleneck” location; at some times it is active and at others it is subject to downstream bottlenecks. Traffic flow characteristics change and that leads to changing situations on each freeway section.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Agyemang-Duah, K., and Hall, F.L. (1991). “Some issues regarding the numerical value of freeway capacity.” Highway capacity and level of service, U. Brannolte, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, 1–15.
2.
Barbour, R., and Fricker, D. J. (1990). “Balancing link counts at nodes using a variety of criteria: An application in local area traffic assignment.” Transportation Research Record, 1220, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 33–39.
3.
Bertini, R.L. (2003). “Toward the systematic diagnosis of freeway bottleneck activation.” IEEE 6th Annual Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Shanghai, China, IEEE, New York.
4.
Cassidy, M. (2001). “Recent findings on simple attributes of freeway formation and propagation.” IEEE Transportation Systems Conf. Proc., Oakland, Calif., IEEE, New York.
5.
Cassidy, M., Anani, S., and Haigwood, J. (2002). “Study of freeway traffic near and off-ramp.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 36(6), 563–572.
6.
Cassidy, M., and Bertini, R. (2001). “Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 33(1), 25–42.
7.
Cassidy, M., and Chung, K. (2002). “Testing Daganzo’s theory of multi-lane freeway traffic.” California PATH working paper (UCB-ITS-PWP-2002-9).
8.
Daganzo, C. (1997). Fundamentals of transportation and traffic operations, Pergamon, New York.
9.
Jia, Z., Chen, C., Coifman, B., and Varaiya, P. (2001). “The PeMS algorithms for accurate, real-time estimates of g-factors and speeds from single-loop detectors.” IEEE Transportation Systems Conf. Proc., Oakland, Calif., IEEE, New York.
10.
Lawson, T., Lovell, D., and Daganzo, C. (1997). “Using the input-output diagram to determine the spatial and temporal extents of a queue upstream of a bottleneck.” Transportation Research Record 1572, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 140–147.
11.
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MDOT). (2002). 〈website http://www.dot. state.mn.us〉 (May 2002).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 130 • Issue 6 • November 2004
Pages: 787 - 795
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.