Impact of Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum Implementation on Airport System Infrastructures
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 6
Abstract
This paper explores the impact of the reduced vertical separation minimum (RVSM) implementation on the airside of a large-airport system infrastructure. The hypothesis is that the frequencies of aircraft operations at the airport threshold, both for the departures and arrivals, will increase since almost double the number of aircraft can be operated in the same quantity of airspace when all flight levels in the RVSM environment are fully utilized. Simulation models are used to test these hypotheses. Airport systems with dependent parallel runways, intersecting runways, and independent parallel runway configurations are selected for our study. The analyses use the full-day traffic of the peak months at each airport as flight inputs and are conducted for both good and poor weather conditions. Not surprisingly, the results confirm that the RVSM implementation would aggravate delay on the airside of an airport system infrastructure, especially on the airfield where the capacity is limited and during the peak hours. The simulations provide insight into where improvements might be made. The methodology developed in this work to explore the factors that contribute to delay with the RVSM implementation is generally applicable to other airport systems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ashford, N., and Wright, P.H. (1992). Airport engineering, Wiley, New York.
2.
ATAC Corporation. (2000). SIMMOD_PLUS Documentation, Sunnyvale, Calif., www.atac.com (Sept. 5, 2000).
3.
EUROCONTROL—European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. ( 1998). Eurocontrol Navigation Program, www.ecacnav.com (May 14, 2003).
4.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (1983). “Airport capacity and delay.” FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Washington, D.C.
5.
Hauksdottir, A.S., Plasson, A., Gunnarsson, H.K., and Olafsson, O.O. (1996). “Assessment of the costs and benefits of future air traffic scenarios.“ Proc., 13th World Congress, Int. Federation of Automatic Control, 363–368.
6.
Horonjeff, R., and McKelvey, F.X. (1993). Planning & design of airports, McGraw-Hill, New York.
7.
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (1992). Manual on Implementation of a 300 m (1,000 ft) vertical seperation minimum between FL290 and FL410 inclusive (DOC 9574), Montreal, Que., Canada.
8.
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2001). “Operational considerations.” Rep. of the 9th Meeting of the ICAO RVSM Implementation Task Force, Bangkok, Thailand.
10.
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), ( 1997). LaGuardia Airport: Major issues and development options, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, New York.
9.
Wohl, M., and Martin, B. (1967). Traffic system analysis for engineers and planners, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.