Analysis of Link Capacity Estimation Methods for Urban Planning Models
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 5
Abstract
A common travel analysis technique is to ascribe capacities to links in a planning network based on functional classification or facility type, under which a four-lane divided arterial, for example, would be assigned the same capacity everywhere, irrespective of the surrounding land use, the presence of traffic signals, and whether turning lanes are provided or not. While this practice has been used for many years and is typically adequate for the analysis of large road networks, there are penalties (in terms of lost accuracy) that accompany its use. The objective of this research was to evaluate different techniques to determine what information was necessary to reasonably estimate link capacity while decreasing the time, effort, and cost of data collection. It was found that assigning capacities on a link-specific basis produced significant differences when compared to the practice of assigning average capacities, suggesting that travel demand modeling could be improved by using link-by-link estimates of capacity. The results of this study also supported the concept that improvements gained by using all Highway Capacity Manual adjustment factors were marginal compared to the improvement achieved by including only the ratio and number of lanes; suggesting further that ignoring other factors like lane widths, heavy vehicles, turning movements, etc. will still result in reasonably accurate estimates of volume, travel time, and travel speed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Dheenadayalu, Y. K. (2002). “Analysis of methods for assigning capacity in a transportation planning network.” Master’s thesis, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, La.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). (1997). “Florida standard urban transportation model structure (FSUTMS).” Technical Rep. No 4: FSUTMS HIGHWAY NETWORK MODEL (HNET), Systems Planning, Fla.
Giaimo, G. (2001). “CAP2000 capacity calculator program documentation.” Office of Technical Services, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio.
Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. (1997). “Network capacity calculation for area type.” Rep. Prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore.
Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC). (1997). “Urban network travel demand evaluation and forecasting.” Subtask 3.1: Evaluation of MPO Networks, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, La.
Maricopa Association of Governments (1999). “Draft model documentation.”
North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). (2001). “Dallas–Fort Worth regional travel model: Description of the multimodal forecasting process.” NCTOG Dept. of Transportation, Arlington, Tex.
Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas Inc. (1995). “Highway network capacity specification, draft methodology.” Rep. prepared for Oregon Dept. of Transportation, Salem, Ore.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1985). Highway capacity manual, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1994). Highway capacity manual, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 22, 2002
Accepted: Nov 3, 2003
Published online: Aug 16, 2004
Published in print: Sep 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.