Critical Gap as a Function of Waiting Time in Determining Roundabout Capacity
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper presents a study of two important roundabout performance issues: (1) the impact of the waiting time of drivers on the approach leg, on the critical gap they accept before entering a roundabout and (2) the entry capacity of the approach. The main hypothesis is that an increase in drivers’ average waiting times reduces the average accepted gap and, consequently, the critical gap. A model for a change in the critical gap at busy roundabouts, with long approach queues and long waiting times, is provided. The model for a change in the critical gap was found to be logistic; i.e., it had an s-shape between a maximum and a minimum critical gap. The parameters of each site studied in the present investigation were found to correlate in regard to geometric complexity and traffic intensity. The parameters were the outside diameter, pedestrian volume, and circulating flow of vehicles around the central island. A reduction in the critical gap because of increased waiting times results in a significant increase in entry capacity, which is particularly significant in high circulating volumes. A model for the entry capacity that depends on the circulating flow, the outside diameter, and the critical gaps (which, in turn, depend on the waiting times) was calibrated and presented. This model was found to be sensitive in high circulating volumes to the critical gap; and in low circulating volumes, to the geometry, represented by the outside diameter. The use of this model is recommended when estimating the entry capacity of either new or existing roundabouts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ashworth, R.(1969). “The capacity of priority-type intersections with a non-uniform distribution of critical acceptance gaps.” Transp. Res., 3, 273–278.
Austroads. (1993). “Guide to traffic engineering practice, Part 6—Roundabouts.” Sydney, Australia.
Drew, R. S. (1968). Traffic flow theory and control, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). (2000). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Kimber, R. M. (1980). “The traffic capacity of roundabouts.” TRRL, L.R. 942, England, 43.
Pollatschek, M. A., Polus, A., and Livneh, M.(2002). “A decision model for gap acceptance and capacity at intersections.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 36, 649–663.
Polus, A., Craus, J., and Reshetnik, I.(1996). “Non-stationary gap acceptance assuming drivers’ learning and impatience.” Traffic Eng. Control, 37(6), 395–402.
Polus, A., and Shmueli, S. (1997). “Analysis and evaluation of the capacity of rotary intersections.” Transportation Research Record 1572, Washington, D.C., 99–104.
Polus, A., and Shmueli, S.(1999). “Entry capacity of roundabouts and impact of waiting times.” Road Transport Res., 8(3), 43–54.
Raff, M. S., and Hart, J. W. (1950). “A volume warrant to urban stop signs.” The Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control, Saugatuck, Conn.
Simon, M. J. (1991). “Roundabouts in Switzerland.” Intersection without traffic signals II, W. Brilon, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 41–52.
Stuwe, B. (1991). “Capacity and safety of roundabouts—German results.” Intersection without traffic signals II, W. Brilon, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1–12.
Teply, S., Abou-Henaidy, M. I., and Hunt, J. D.(1997). “Gap acceptance behavior: Aggregate and logit perspective.” Traffic Eng. Control, 38(9), 474–482.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 6, 2001
Accepted: Sep 27, 2002
Published online: Aug 15, 2003
Published in print: Sep 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.