Optimum Flexible Pavement Life-Cycle Analysis Model
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 6
Abstract
A flexible pavement life-cycle model has been developed to yield an optimum maintenance and rehabilitation plan. The model incorporates into the optimization process both performance and cost associated with a life-cycle analysis period for a given pavement structure (project). A single life-cycle indicator called “life-cycle disutility” has been introduced and defined as the ratio of cost to performance. The optimum plan is the one associated with the minimum life-cycle disutility value. The model evaluates several potential maintenance and rehabilitaton plans generated according to two defined decision policy options. The first decision policy option requires a fixed analysis period, whereas the second one involves a variable analysis period. Both options require a specified number of major rehabilitation cycles. Pavement life-cycle cost includes initial construction, scheduled major rehabilitation cycles, and routine maintenance and added user cost. Pavement life-cycle performance is defined as the area under the life-cycle performance curve either generated from actual pavement distress data or based on an incremental analysis of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials basic design equation of flexible pavement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abaza, K. A., Ashur, S., Abu-Eisheh, S., and Rabay’a, A.(2001). “Macroscopic optimum system for management of pavement rehabilitation.” J. Transp. Eng., 127(6), 493–500.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures, Washington, D.C.
California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS). (1995). Highway design manual (HDM). 5th Ed., Sacramento, Calif.
Delwar, T., and Papagiannakis, T. (1998). “A generic LCCA model for pavement investment decisions.” Proc., 79th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1994). Life-cycle cost analysis: Summary of Proc., FHWA Life Cycle Cost Symposium, Searching for Solutions, Washington, D.C.
George, K. P., Rajagopal, A. S., and Lim, L. K. (1989). “Models for predicting pavement deterioration.” Transportation Research Record 1215, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–7.
Gopinath, D., Ben-Akiva, M., and Ramaswamy, R. (1994). “Modeling performance of highway pavement.” Transportation Research Record 1449, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–7.
Hass, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. P. (1994). Modern pavement management, Krieger, Malabar, Fla.
Haung, Y. H. (1993). Pavement analysis and design, 1st Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Nevada Department of Transportation (NVDOT). (1988). Maintenance Management System manual of instructions (MMSMI), Maintenance Division, Carson City, Nev.
Road and Transportation Association of Canada (RTAG). (1977). Pavement management guide, Ottawa.
Shahin, M. Y., Stock, C., and Beckberger, L. (1994). “Comparing pavement performance and its effect on maintenance and rehabilitation cost.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Managing Pavement, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1, 237–245.
World Bank. (1985). Highway design and maintenance model (HDM-III), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Yoder, E. J., and Witczak, M. W. (1975). Principles of pavement design, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 4, 2001
Accepted: Jan 18, 2002
Published online: Oct 15, 2002
Published in print: Nov 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.