Optimal Allocation of Resources To Meet Transit Fleet Requirements
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 6
Abstract
A two-stage procedure to optimally allocate limited resources for the dual purpose of purchasing new transit buses and rebuilding existing buses is presented in this paper. In stage 1, estimates are derived for the maximum investment that can be justified for rebuilding buses that have fulfilled their service life expectations. In stage 2, optimization by linear programming is used to estimate the number of buses in each category. Two optimization approaches are presented. In approach 1, the objective is to maximize the weighted fleet life, subject to budgetary and demand constraints. In approach 2, the objective is to minimize the total capital investment in the fleet, subject to minimum fleet life and demand constraints. Case studies are presented to demonstrate the application of two approaches. The proposed procedure can be used by state Departments of Transportation to allocate capital dollars among various transit agencies for the dual purpose of purchasing new buses and rebuilding older buses. While it is desirable to replace all the old buses with new ones, budgetary constraints often make it impossible to fund the purchase of all new buses. The proposed approach provides a tool to identify the “next best solution,” a solution that will result in an optimum combination of new and rebuilt buses that will satisfy the requirements of the minimum fleet size as well as the budgetary constraints.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ATE Management Services and Enterprises. (1983). “Vehicle rehabilitation/replacement study.” Rep. Prepared for Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C.
Balzer, B. B., Savage, A. E., and Stark, R. C. (1980). Survey and analysisof bus rehabilitation in the mass transportation industry, ATE Management and Service Company, Cincinnati.
Bridgeman, M. S., McInerney, S. R., Judnick, W. E., Artson, M., and Fowler, B. (1983a). “Feasibility of determining economic differences between new buses and rehabilitated buses.” Rep. prepared for Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio.
Bridgeman, M. S., Sveinsson, H., and King, R. D. (1983b). “Economic comparison of new buses versus rehabilitated buses.” Rep. prepared for UMTA, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA). (1992). “Public transportation in the U.S.: performance and condition.” Rep. to Congress presented to 49 USC 308, Washington, D.C.
Felicetti, J. M.(1985). “New life for old buses.” Communication Channels, 100(9), 25–31.
Grant, E. L., Ireson, W. G., and Lavenworth, R. S. (1990). Principles of engineering economy, 8th Ed., Wiley, New York.
Hillier, F. S., and Lieberman, G. J. (1969). Introduction to operations research, Holden Day, San Francisco.
Khasnabis, S., and Naseer, M. (1999a). “Vehicle benefit cost analysis.” Final Rep. prepared for the Michigan Department of Transportation, Wayne State Univ., Detroit.
Khasnabis, S., and Naseer, M., (1999b). “Framework for analyzing alternatives to transit bus replacement.” Transportation Research Record 1669, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 81–86.
Khasnabis, S., and Naseer, M. (2001). “A procedure to evaluate alternatives to transit bus replacement.” Transportation Research Record 1731, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 51–60.
Khasnabis, S., Opiela, K. S., and Arbogast, R. G.(1982). “Economic evaluation of development projects on transportation ROW.” J. Transp. Eng., 108(1), 51–70.
Khasnabis, S., Rudrarajn, R. K., and Baig, M. F.(1999). “Economic evaluation of signal preemption projects.” J. Transp. Eng., 125(2), 160–167.
McLead, D. S. (1982). “Economics of bus rehabilitation.” Transportation Research Record 887, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 3–8.
Microsoft Excel Solver. (1999). Microsoft, Redmond, Wash.
Van Horne, J. C. (1980). Financial management and policy, 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
Weston, F. J., and Brigham, E. F. (1978). Managerial finance, 6th Ed., Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Ill.
Winfrey, R. (1969). Economic analysis for highways, International Text Book, Scranton, Pa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 128 • Issue 6 • November 2002
Pages: 509 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 13, 2001
Accepted: Jan 3, 2002
Published online: Oct 15, 2002
Published in print: Nov 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.