Numerical Study on Traffic Flow with Single Parameter State Equation
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 2
Abstract
Traffic flow has been studied numerically by solving the kinematic wave equation with the second-order Monotone Upwind Scheme of Conservation Law (MUSCL), together with the boundary and initial conditions, which are examined by a computer based random generator derived from the Erlang process of order 250. With regard to traffic mixing, a fundamental flow-density diagram of road traffic is presented, where the ratio between the optimal and jam densities is used as a single parameter; its value is predicted by assuming that fast moving vehicles have a relatively large free speed but slow moving vehicles have a smaller free speed. Simple analysis for the state equation indicates that the parameter should be in a proper range from 0.333 to 0.618 to ensure a free speed beyond the optimal traffic speed. The effects of the single parameter on the spread of traffic shock wave have been discussed. It is found that, for congested traffic flow, in the case of a given flow density at the place of inlet and exit, the effects of the parameter on the propagation speed is apparent, while in the case of assigned flow rate on the inlet and the exit boundaries, the propagation speed is slightly dependent on the parameter. The propagation of density and flow rate fluctuation can be observed clearly from the corresponding 3D presentations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bick, J. H., and Newell, G. F.(1960). “A continuum model for traffic flow on an undivided highway.” Q. Appl. Math., 18(2), 191–204.
Bui, D. D., Nelson, P., and Narashimhan, S. L. (1992). “Computational realizations of the entropy condition in modeling congested trafficflow.” Rep. FHWA/TX-92/1232-7, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Daganzo, C.(1995a). “A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol., 29(4), 261–276.
Daganzo, C.(1995b). “Requiem for second order approximations of traffic flow.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol., 24(4), 277–286.
De, S. C.(1956). “Kinematic wave theory of bottlenecks of varying capacity.” Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 52(3), 564–572.
Haight, F. A. (1974). Mathematical theory of traffic flow, 3rd Ed., Academic, New York.
Lighthill, M. J., and Whitham, G. B.(1955). “On kinematic waves. II: A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 229, 317–345.
Michalopoulos, P. G., Beskos, D. E., and Lin, J. K.(1984). “Analysis of interrupted traffic flow by finite difference methods.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol., 18, 409–421.
Payne, H. J.(1971). “Models of freeway traffic and control.” Simulation Council Proc. Math. Public System, 1(1), 51–61.
Richards, P. I.(1956). “Shock waves on the highway.” Oper. Res., 4, 42–51.
Shui, H. S. (1998). Finite difference in one dimensional fluid mechanics, National Defense, Beijing.
Van Leer, B.(1979). “Toward the ultimate conservation difference scheme. V: A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method.” J. Comput. Phys., 32, 101–136.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 128 • Issue 2 • March 2002
Pages: 167 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 7, 2000
Accepted: Jun 11, 2001
Published online: Mar 1, 2002
Published in print: Mar 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.