TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2000

Development of a Pavement Rutting Model from Experimental Data

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 4

Abstract

Properly specified pavement deterioration models are an important input for the efficient management of pavements, the allocation of cost responsibilities to various vehicle classes for their use of the highway system, and the design of pavement structures. However, most empirical deterioration progression models developed to date have had limited success. This paper is concerned with the development of an empirical rutting progression model using experimental data. The data used in this paper comprise an unbalanced panel data set with more than 14,000 observations taken from the AASHO Road Test. The salient features of the model specification are (1) the model eschews conventional (predefined) axle load equivalencies and structural numbers in favor of relationships determined entirely by the data itself; (2) a thawing index variable has been incorporated to capture the effects of the environmental factors in the AASHO Road Test; and (3) the model predicts incremental changes in rut depth, which is particularly advantageous in a pavement management context. The specified model is nonlinear in the variables and the parameters and is estimated using both fixed-effects and random-effects specifications to account for unobserved heterogeneity. The estimation results show that the model replicates the pavement behavior well, that the inclusion of an environmental variable is important to avoid biases in other parameters, and that the size of the unobserved heterogeneity is significant. It is also found that interactions betwen some parameters in the nonlinear specification leads to significant differences between parameter estimates among the two wheel paths rutting models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
AASHTO. ( 1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures, Washington, D.C.
2.
Ali, H., Tayabji, S., and La Torre, F. ( 1998). “Calibration of a mechanistic-empirical rutting model for in-service pavements.” 77th Annu. Meeting of the Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
3.
Archilla, A. R. ( 2000). “Development of rutting progression models by combining data from multiple sources.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
4.
Behzadi, G., and Yandell, W. O. (1996). “Determination of elastic and plastic subgrade soil parameters for asphalt cracking and rutting prediction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1540, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 97–104.
5.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Morikawa, T. (1990). “Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions.” Transportation Research, 24A(6), 485–495.
6.
Button, J. W., Perdomo, D., and Lytton, R. L. (1990). “Influence of aggregate on rutting in asphalt concrete pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1259, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 141–152.
7.
Diylajee, V. A., and Raymond, G. P. (1982). “Repetitive load deformation of cohesionless soil.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 108(10), 1215–1229.
8.
Greene, W. H. (1997). Econometric analysis, 3rd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
9.
Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. (1994). Modern pavement management, Krieger Publishing Co., Melbourne, Florida.
10.
Harvey, J. T., et al. (1997). “CAL-APT program: Test results from accelerated pavement test on pavement structure containing asphalt treated permeable base (ATPB)—Section 500 RF.” Rep. Prepared for California Department of Transportation, Pavement Res. Ctr., Inst. of Transp. Studies, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
11.
Highway Research Board (HRB). (1962). “The AASHO road test—Report 5—Pavement Research.” Hwy. Res. Board Spec. Rep. 61E, Publ. No. 954, National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
12.
Kandhal, P. S., Cross, S. A., and Brown, E. R. (1993). “Heavy-duty asphalt pavements in Pennsylvania: Evaluation for rutting.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1384, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 49–58.
13.
Kenis, W. J. (1977). “Predictive design procedures: A design method for flexible pavements using the VESYS structured subsystems.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on the Struct. Des. of Asphalt Pavements, 101–130.
14.
Khedr, S. A. (1986). “Deformation mechanism in asphaltic concrete.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 112(1), 29–45.
15.
Lister, N. W. ( 1981). “Heavy wheel loads and road pavements—Damage relationships.” Symp. on Heavy Freight Vehicles and their Effects, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
16.
Maree, J. H., Freeme, C. R., van Zyl, N. J. W., and Savage, P. F. (1982). “The permanent deformation of pavements with untreated crushed-stone bases as measured in heavy vehicle simulators tests.” Proc., 11th Conf., Australian Road Research Board, Melbourne.
17.
Monismith, C. L. (1976). “Rutting prediction in asphalt concrete pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 616, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2–8.
18.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). ( 1988). Heavy trucks, climate and pavement damage, prepared by an OECD scientific experts group, Paris.
19.
Paterson, W. D. O. (1987). Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management, Hwy. Des. and Maintenance Standard Ser., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
20.
Saraf, C. L. (1982). “Verification and calibration of the PDMP and COLD computer programs.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Struct. Des. of Asphalt Pavements, 321–332.
21.
Thompson, M. R., and Nauman, D. (1993). “Rutting rate analyses of the AASHO road test flexible pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1384, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 36–48.
22.
Vuong, B., and Amstrong, P. ( 1991). Repeated load triaxial testing on the subgrades from Mulgrace ALF site, Australian Road Research Board.
23.
Yoder, E. J., and Witczak, M. W. (1975). Principle of pavement design, Wiley, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126Issue 4July 2000
Pages: 291 - 299

History

Received: Jul 12, 1999
Published online: Jul 1, 2000
Published in print: Jul 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Adrián Ricardo Archilla
Grad. Res. Asst., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share