Evaluation of Highway Consistency and Safety: Practical Application
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 3
Abstract
Current design practices in North America are based mainly on 2D analysis of the highway alignment and do not account for the operating speed adopted by drivers. A more accurate approach should consider the interaction among the horizontal alignment, vertical alignment, and cross section based on the predicted operating speed. By combining the operating speed models along with 3D sight distance and vehicle dynamics models, a practical application of this approach is presented using an 8-km segment of Highway 61 (Ontario, Canada). By comparing the profile of predicted operating speed to the profile of allowable speed, based on 3D sight distance and vehicle dynamics, the consistency or deficiency in the highway segment is identified. The paper demonstrates the applicability of the 3D models to real highway segments and their usefulness in evaluating the adequacy of new designs or roads already in service. As the difference between the 2D and 3D results is significant, the 2D analysis is proven to be inadequate for such an evaluation, and the need for a 3D analysis is evident. Also, field measurements show that the accuracy of operating speed models is considerably compromised on combined horizontal and vertical curves. Thus, the results indicate the need to develop operating speed models that account for the effect of combined alignments and nighttime driving.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Collins, K. M., and Krammes, R. A. (1996). “Preliminary validation of a speed-profile model for design consistency evaluation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1523, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 11–21.
2.
Geometric design standards for Ontario Highways. (1985). Ministry of Transportation, Downsview, ON, Canada.
3.
Gillespie, T. D. (1992). Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa.
4.
Hassan, Y. ( 1996). “Geometric design considerations of combined horizontal and vertical highway alignments,” PhD thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa.
5.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1996). “Analytical model for sight distance analysis on 3-D highway alignments.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1523, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–10.
6.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1997a). “Automation of marking passing and no-passing zones on two-lane highways.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 24(2), 263–275.
7.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1997b). “Modeling headlight sight distance on three-dimensional highway alignments.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1579, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 79–88.
8.
Hassan, Y., Easa, S. M., and Abd El Halim, A. O. (1998). “State-of-the-art of three-dimensional highway geometric design.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 25(3), 500–511.
9.
Hoerner, S. F. (1965). Fluid dynamic drag. Midland Park, N.J.
10.
Kontaratos, M., Psarianos, B., and Yotis, A. (1994). “Minimum horizontal curve radius as function of grade incurred by vehicle motion in driving mode.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1445, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 86–93.
11.
Krammes, R. A., et al. (1995). “Horizontal alignment design consistency for rural two-lane highways.” Rep. FHWA/RD-94-934, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
12.
Krammes, R. A., and Garnham, M. A. (1995). “Review of alignment design policies worldwide.” Proc., Symp. on Hwy. Geometric Des. Pract., Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 19:1–19:17.
13.
Lamm, R., and Choueiri, E. (1987). “Recommendations for evaluating horizontal design consistency based on investigations in the state of New York.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1122, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 68–78.
14.
Lamm, R., and Smith, B. (1994). “Curvilinear alinement: An important issue for more consistent and safer road characteristic.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1445, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 12–21.
15.
Lamm, R., Choueiri, E., Hayward, J., and Paluri, A. (1988). “Possible design procedures to promote design consistency in highway geometric design on two lane rural roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1195, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 111–122.
16.
Leish, J. E., and Leish, J. P. (1977). “New concepts in design speed application.” Transp. Res. Rec. 631, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 4–14.
17.
Manual of geometric design standards for Canadian roads. (1986). Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa.
18.
A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. (1994). AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 3 • May 2000
Pages: 193 - 201
History
Received: Nov 20, 1997
Published online: May 1, 2000
Published in print: May 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.