Relative Effectiveness of Road Dust Suppressants
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 5
Abstract
The relative effectiveness of commercially available road dust suppressants in abating fugitive dust emission and loss of fines from unpaved road surfaces was assessed in a field-based research project. The dust suppressants studied, lignin derivatives and chloride based compounds, were used on unpaved road test sections during the severe dusty months of 1993 and 1994 in Colorado, which fell in the late spring to autumn period. To measure the relative effectiveness of the different dust suppressants, comparative fugitive dust emission studies were conducted on unpaved road test sections using the Colorado State University Dustometer, a dust-sampling device developed during this research. In addition, total aggregate loss from the surfaces of the test sections was measured. Based upon the prevailing costs, analyses were performed to determine the economics of using the different dust suppressants. The research indicated that all three dust suppressants studied reduced fugitive dust emission from the unpaved roadways by 50–70%. The treated test sections retained 42–61% more aggregate than the untreated control test section. The cost savings of retaining aggregate on the treated test sections more than offset the costs of the dust suppressants, resulting in an estimated cost savings of 28–42% over the untreated control test section.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barnard, W. R., and Stewart, M. A. (1992). “Improved fugitive PM10 emissions estimates for trends.”Trans., PM10 standards and nontraditional particulate source controls, Air and Waste Mgmt. Assn., Pittsburgh, Pa.
2.
Bohn, R., Cuscino, T., and Coward, C. Jr. (1978). “Fugitive emissions from integrated iron and steel plants.”Publ. No. EPA-600/2-78-050, U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
3.
Casagrande, A.(1948). “Classification and identification of soils.”Trans. ASCE, 113, 922.
4.
Eaton, R. A., Gerard, S., and Gate, D. W. (1988). Rating unsurfaced roads. Army Corps of Engr., Cold Regions Res. and Engrg. Lab., Hanover, N.H.
5.
Hoover, J. M., Bergerson, K. L., Fox, D. E., Denny, C. K., and Handy, R. L. (1973). “Surface improvement and dust palliation of unpaved secondary roads and streets.”Final Rep., Iowa Hwy. Res. Board Proj., HR-151.
6.
Investigation on Fugitive Dust; Volume 1: Sources, Emissions, and Control. (1974). Publ. No. EPA-450/3-74-036, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
7.
Lane, D. D., Baxter, T. E., Cuscino, T., and Coward, C. Jr. (1984). “Use of laboratory methods to quantify dust suppressants effectiveness.”Trans., Soc. of Min. Engr. of AIME, 274–2001.
8.
Lane, D. D. (1989). “Controlling dust on unpaved roads.”Rural Transp. Fact Sheet No. 84-02. T2 Program, Univ. of Kansas Transp. Ctr., Lawrence, Kan.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1997
Published in print: Sep 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.