Evaluation of Road Maintenance Automation
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 1
Abstract
Automated road maintenance can produce direct and indirect cost savings; improvements in safety, quality, working environment, and productivity; and reduction of vehicle emissions and energy consumption due to expedited maintenance operations. However evaluating automation needs and systems at various stages of development is difficult. The objectives of the research described here were to: (1) develop a systematic methodology to evaluate the costs and benefits of automated road maintenance; (2) to identify the maintenance activities that are conceptually feasible for automation; and (3) to evaluate the technical feasibility of specific automated systems. The first objective was achieved by the development of a comprehensive Automated Road Maintenance Evaluation (ARME) methodology. The ARME methodology provides procedures through which maintenance activities or systems designed to automate those activities can be evaluated from economic and qualitative perspectives. The second objective was achieved by using the ARME methodology's needs assessment procedure to evaluate the conceptual feasibility of automating the major maintenance activities of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Of the 25 maintenance activities evaluated, those found to be conceptually feasible for automation include base removal and replacement, crack and joint sealing, leveling or overlays, pothole repairs, strip and spot seal, seal coat, ditch maintenance, traffic assistance, and paint and bead striping. The third objective was achieved by using the ARME methodology's technology evaluation procedure to evaluate the technical feasibility of implementing an Automated Crack Sealer (ACS) system in Texas. An ACS system is considered feasible, and field implementation is now in progress. Transportation departments can apply the ARME methodology in their own environments to support decisions concerning automation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO Maintenance Manual 1987. (1987). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
2.
Alonso Holtorf, V. A. (1987). “A study of automation potential in commercial building construction,” MS thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, Mass.
3.
Demsetz, L. A. (1989). “Task identification and machine design for construction automation,” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Massachusetts Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, Mass.
4.
District and county statistics. (1992). Division of Finance, Texas Dept. of Transp., Austin, Tex.
5.
“Fabrication and testing of an automated crack sealing machine.” (1993). Report No. SHRP-H-659, National Research Council, Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
6.
Fazio, P., Moselhi, O., and Hason, S. (1989). “Automation index for evaluation of robotics implementation in construction.”Proc., 6th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Constr., Constr. Ind. Inst., Austin, Tex., 317–324.
7.
Goto, F., and Saitoh, T. (1992). “Development of advanced asphalt finisher.”Proc., of 9th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Constr., Japan Ind. Robot Assoc., Tokyo, Japan.
8.
Haas, C., Hajek, J., and Haas, R. (1991). “Opportunities for automation in pavement maintenance.”Proc., Transp. Assoc. of Can. Annu. Conf., Transp. Assoc. of Can., Ohawa, Canada.
9.
Haas, C., Hendrickson, C., McNeil, S., and Bullock, D. (1992). “A field prototype of a robotic pavement crack sealing system.”Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Constr., Japan Ind. Robot Assoc., Tokyo, Japan.
10.
Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. (1994). Modern Pavement Management, Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, Fla.
11.
Highway statistics. (1990). Federal Hwy. Admin., U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
12.
Hsieh, T., and Haas, C. (1993). “Costs and benefits of automated road maintenance.”Transp. Res. Rec. No. 1406, Transp. Res. Board, Nat. Res. Council, Washington, D.C., 10–19.
13.
Kangari, R., and Halpin, D. W. (1988). “Automation and robotics in construction: a feasibility study.”Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Constr., Japan Ind. Robot Assoc., Tokyo, Japan, 161–167.
14.
Klemens, T. L. (1990). “Balancing force-account work with contracted maintenance.”Hwy. and Heavy Constr., (June), 44–46.
15.
Malek, G. J. (1993). “Methods, practices, and productivity study of crack sealing/filling in Texas.”Masters report, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
16.
McNeil, S. (1992). “An analysis of the costs and impacts of the automation of pavement crack sealing.”6th World Conf. on Transp. Res., Lyon, France.
17.
MEARS report for 1992. (1992). Maintenance Div., Texas Dept. of Transp., Austin, Tex.
18.
MEARS report for first nine months of 1993. (1993). Maintenance Div., Texas Dept. of Transp., Austin, Tex.
19.
Memmot, J., and Dudek, C. (1982). “A model to calculate the road user costs at work zones.”Res. Rep. 292-1, Texas Transp. Inst., Austin, Tex.
20.
Osmani, A. (1994). “A model for evaluating automation in road maintenance,” MS thesis, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
21.
Seshadri, P., Solminihac, H. E., and Harrison, R. (1993). “Modification of the QUEWZ model to estimate fuel costs and tailpipe emissions.”Proc., 72nd Annu. Meeting of Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
22.
Skibniewski, M. J. (1988). Robotics in civil engineering. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, N.Y.
23.
Skibniewski, M., and Hendrickson, C. (1990). “Automation and robotics for road construction and maintenance.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 116(3) 261–271.
24.
Solminihac, H. E. (1992). “System analysis for expediting urban highway construction.” Dissertation, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
25.
Statewide summary report for 1992. (1993a). Texas Dept. of Transp., Austin, Tex.
26.
Statewide summary report for first 9 months of 1993. (1993b). Texas Dept. of Transp., Austin, Tex.
27.
Tucker, R. L., Peterson, C., Meyer, J., and Simonson, T. (1990). “A methodology for identifying automation opportunities in industrial construction.”Source document 56, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
28.
Umeda, R., et al. (1993). “Development of a robot asphalt paver.”Automation and Robotics in Construction X, Watson, Tucker, and Walters, eds., Elsevier, New York, N.Y.
29.
Warszawski, A., and Sangrey, D. A.(1985). “Robotics in building construction.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(3), 260–280.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 1 • January 1996
Pages: 50 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1996
Published in print: Jan 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.