Space Standards for Sizing Air-Terminal Check-in Areas
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 2
Abstract
The appropriateness of the current space standards (occupancy rates) for airline check-in area design is discussed. Based on a study of passenger walking patterns at the two international airports in Montreal, it is suggested that the design standards recommended in the International Air Transport Association guidelines result in an oversupply of space, sometimes in excess of twice the required minimum. This is attributed partly to the definition of capacity and the lack of a formal procedure for treating items such as luggage, carts, and stationary passengers that impede movement. It is proposed that the design occupancy rate be determined by adjusting the maximum occupancy rate to account for the impedance. Maximum occupancy rate is derived according to the relationship between occupancy rate and walking speed of passengers without baggage or carts, whereas adjustment factors are computed along the same principles as the passenger-car equivalency factors used in highway capacity analysis. The standard equivalent passenger in the present case is defined as a stationary passenger without a cart, and the space required by moving passengers with and without carts is estimated relative to the standard passenger. Application of the technique is explained using a numerical example.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“The apron and terminal building report.” (1975). Rep. FAA-RD-75-191, Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration, Ralph M. Parsons Co.
2.
Daly, P. N., McGrath, F., and Annesley, T. J.(1991). “Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for underground stations.”Traffic Engrg. & Control, 32(2), 75–78.
3.
Davis, D. G., and Braaksma, J. P. (1988). “Adjusting for luggage-laden pedestrians in airport terminals. Transp. Res. Part A, 22A(5), 375–388.
4.
“A discussion paper on level of service definition and methodology for calculating airport capacity.” (1979). Tech. Rep. TP2027, Transport Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
5.
Drake, J. S., Schofer, J., and May, A. (1967). “A statistical analysis of speed density hypotheses.”Hwy. Res. Record 154, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
6.
Fruin, J. J. (1971). Pedestrian planning and design . Metropolitan Association of Urban Designer and Environmental Planners, Inc., New York, N.Y.
7.
Greenshields, B. D. (1934). “A study of traffic capacity.”Proc., Hwy. Res. Board, Vol. 14, 448–477.
8.
Guidelines for airport capacity/demand management. (1981). AACC/IATA, Geneva, Switzerland.
9.
Guidelines for airport capacity/demand management. (1990). 2nd Ed., AACC/IATA, Geneva, Switzerland.
10.
“Highway Capacity Manual.” (1985). Spec. Rep. 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
11.
“Measuring airport landside capacity.”Spec. Rep. 215, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
12.
Mori, M., and Tsukaguchi, H. (1987). “A new method for evaluation of levels of service in pedestrian facilities.”Transp. Res. Part A, 21A(3), 223–234.
13.
Polus, A., Schofer, J. L., and Ushpiz, A.(1983). “Pedestrian flow and level of service.”J. Transp. Engrg., 109(1), 46–56.
14.
Pushkarev, B., and Zupan, J. M. (1975). “Capacity of walkways.”Transp. Res. Record 588, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–15.
15.
Tanaborboon, Y. (1989). “Level of service standards for pedestrian facilities in Bangkok: a case study. ITE J., 59(11), 39–41.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1995
Published in print: Mar 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.