New Crack‐Imaging Procedure Using Spatial Autocorrelation Function
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 2
Abstract
An innovative method of applying a spatial autocorrelation function to analyze pavement image data is presented in this paper. One of the major advantages of using a spatial autocorrelation function is its capability of suppressing the noise. By calculating the autocorrelation function of the pavement image, we can measure direction and area of the crack under the presence of background noise. An algorithm is developed and programmed using C language to identify crack type and to measure crack density automatically. The algorithm is illustrated using artificially prepared crack images. Randomly selected sample video images of real cracks are used to demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed automated crack‐imaging procedure. Based on the limited set of data, it is concluded that the proposed automated procedure can identify crack type and density with a reasonable accuracy. It is proposed that the crack‐density measure could be used as a combined index of various crack types for managing pavements at the network level.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abutaleb, A. S. (1989). “Automatic thresholding of gray‐level pictures using two‐dimensional entropy.” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 47, 22–32.
2.
Acosta, J. A., Figueroa, J. L., and Mullen, R. L. (1992). “Feasibility study to implement the video image processing technique for evaluating pavement surface distress in the state of Ohio.” FHWA/OF‐91/010, Case Western Univ., Cleveland, Ohio.
3.
“Automated pavement distress data collection equipment seminar questions & answers.” (1990). Proc. Automated Pavement Distress Seminar, Federal Highway Administration, Ames, Iowa.
4.
Bracewell, R. N. (1985). “Fourier techniques in two dimensions.” Fourier techniques and applications, Plenum Press, New York, N.Y., 45–71.
5.
Burke, M. W., Arnberg, P. W., and Rahs, K. (1991). “PAVUE: A real‐time pavement distress analyzer,” presented at the International Conference on SHRP/Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Gothenburg, Sweden.
6.
Caroff, G., Joubert, P., Prudhomme, F., and Soussain, G. (1990). “MACADAM (1): An operating system of pavement deterioration diagnosis by image processing,” presented at the 69th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
7.
Fukuhara, T., Terada, K., Nagao, M., Kasahara, A., and Ichihashi, S. (1990). “Automatic pavement‐distress‐survey system.” J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 116(3), 280–286.
8.
Gonzalez, R. C., and Wintz, P. (1987). Digital image processing. 2nd Ed., Addison‐Wesley, Reading, Pa.
9.
Haas, C., and Hendrickson, C. (1991). “Integration of diverse technologies for pavement sensing.” Transp. Res. Record, 1311, 92–102.
10.
Haas, C., Shen, H., and Haas, R. (1985). “ADDA SYSTEM 1 (Automated pavement distress data acquisition and evaluation system).” Report 21156, Ministry of Transp. and Communications, Toronto, Ontario.
11.
Haralick, R. M., and Shapiro, L. G. (1985). “SURVEY—Image segmentation techniques.” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 29, 100–132.
12.
Knoll, T. F., and Delp, E. J. (1986). “Adaptive gray scale mapping to reduce registration noise in difference images.” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 33, 129–137.
13.
Koutsopoulos, H. N., Mishalani, R. G., and Downey, A. B. (1991). “Flexible pavement distress evaluation using image analysis.” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Applications of Advanced Tech. in Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 233–237.
14.
Lee, H. (1990). “Evaluation of Pavedex computerized pavement image processing system in Washington.” Proc. Automated Pavement Distress Seminar, Federal Highway Administration, 205–224.
15.
Lee, H. (1991). “Standardization of distress measurements for the network‐level pavement management system.” ASTM STP 1121, F. B. Holt, W. L. Gramling, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa.
16.
Li, L., Chan, P., and Lytton, R. L. (1991a). “Detection of thin cracks on ‘noisy’ pavement images.” Transp. Res. Record, 1311, 131–135.
17.
Li, L., Chan, P., Rao, A., and Lytton, R. L. (1991b). “Flexible pavement distress evaluation using image analysis.” Proc. Applications of Advanced Tech. in Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 473–477.
18.
McDaniel, L. D., Butler, B., Merrill, R., and Zhang, X. (1989). “Image processing for pavement distress measurement: the Pavement Distress Imager‐I,” presented at the 68th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
19.
Mohajeri, J. H., and Manning, P. J. (1991). “ARIA: An operating system of pavement distress diagnosis by image processing.” Transp. Res. Record, 1311, 120–130.
20.
Patterson, W. D. O. (1987). Road deterioration and maintenance effects. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md.
21.
Proceedings of the Automated Pavement Distress Seminar. (1990). Federal Highway Administration, Ames, Iowa.
22.
Ritchie, S. D., Kaseko, M., and Bavarian, B. (1991). “Development of an intelligent system for automated pavement evaluation.” Transp. Res. Record, 1311, 112–119.
23.
Smith, K. D., Darter, M. I., and Hall, K. T. (1989). Distress identification manual for the long‐term pavement performance (LTPP) studies. Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
24.
Smith, R. E., Darter, M. I., and Herrin, S. M. (1979). “Highway pavement distress identification manual.” Report No. FHWA‐RD‐79‐66, Federal Highway Admin., Washington, D.C.
25.
Trivedi, M. M. (1990). “Selected papers on digital image processing.” SPIE Milestone Series, Volume MS 17.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 17, 1991
Published online: Mar 1, 1994
Published in print: Mar 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.