Evaluating the Capacity of Freeway Weaving Sections
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 3
Abstract
The research described in this paper employed simulation modeling and empirical observations in an effort to: (1) Identify the traffic flow phenomena that characterize freeway weaving section capacity; and (2) determine appropriate traffic flow rate values that reflect weaving section capacity. The INTRAS microscopic simulation model was calibrated and validated using empirical data collected at a weaving site. Increasing traffic demands were then sequentially input into repeated simulation runs to identify the boundary between uncongested and congested operation. Where a weaving section exhibits a typical level of both merging and diverging traffic movements, capacity is defined as a function of flows and lane‐changing rates occurring in the vicinity of the weaving area's merge gore. Where a weaving section operates with a relatively low total weaving demand, capacity is defined as a maximum rate of vehicles per lane. Validation experiments described in this paper suggest that the derived values of capacity apply to any one‐sided freeway weaving section.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cassidy, M., and May, A. D. (1991). “A proposed model analytical technique for estimating capacity and LOS of major freeway weaving sections.” Transp. Res. Record, October.
2.
Cassidy, M. et al. (1990). “A proposed analytical technique for the design and analysis of major freeway weaving sections.” Institute of Transportation Studies Res. Rep. No. UCCB‐ITS‐RR‐90‐DRAFT, Univ. of California.
3.
Cassidy, M., Skabardonis, A., and May, A. D. (1989). “Operation of major freeway weaving sections: Recent empirical evidence.” Transp. Res. Record No. 1225.
4.
Fazio, J. (1985). “Refinement of a weaving operational analysis and design procedure and evaluation of four weaving operational analysis and design procedures.” Final Rep., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Mech. and Metallurgy, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, June.
5.
Hall, F., and Hall, L. (1990). “Capacity and speed‐flow analysis of the Queen Elizabeth Way in Ontario.” Transp. Res. Record No. 1287.
6.
Highway capacity manual. (1985). Transportation Research Board, Special Rep. No. 209, Washington, D.C.
7.
Leisch, J. (1985). “Procedures for analysis and design of weaving sections, user guide.” Rep. FHWA/RD‐85/083, Washington, D.C.
8.
Moskowitz, K., and Newman, L. (1963). “Notes on freeway capacity.” Highway Res. Record No. 27, Washington, D.C.
9.
Pignataro, L. et al. (1975). “Weaving areas—Design and analysis.” NCHRP Rep. No. 195, Polytechnic Institute, Brooklyn, N.Y.
10.
Reilly, W. et al. (1984). “Weaving analysis procedures for the new Highway Capacity Manual.” Report by JHK & Associates.
11.
Skabardonis, A., Cassidy, M., and May, A. D. (1988). “Operation of major freeway weaving areas: Findings from the application of existing analytical methods and simulation modeling.” Institute of Transportation Studies Res. Rep. No. UCB‐ITS‐WP‐88‐12, Univ. of California.
12.
Theophilopoulos, N. (1986). “A turbulence approach at ramp junctions,” PhD thesis, Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, N.Y.
13.
Wicks, D. A., and Lieberman, E. B. (1980). “Development and testing of INTRAS, A microscopic freeway simulation model.” 2, User's Manual, Final Rep. No. FHWA/RD‐80/107, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 27, 1992
Published online: May 1, 1993
Published in print: May 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.