Procedures for Estimating Accident Reductions on Two‐Lane Highways
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 1
Abstract
Accident prediction models or the before‐and‐after study approach is commonly used to estimate the reduction in number of accidents resulting from highway improvements. The highway improvement evaluation results will depend on the approach used, if the two approaches do not yield the same number of accidents reduced. This study computed the accident reductions on two‐lane rural highways in Illinois using: (1) Mathematical models for accident frequency prediction; and (2) a before‐and‐after study with control sites. Accident data for two years before and two years after the improvements were collected. One linear and three multiplicative form models were used to fit the accident data collected from 51 projects with a total length of 349 mi. The linear models were found to be as good as, and in some cases even better than, the multiplicative models in explaining the variation of accident frequency in both before and after conditions. The linear models indicated a stronger correlation between accident frequency, traffic volume, and roadway geometry than the multiplicative models for an ADT range of 500–5,000. This finding is contrary to that of Boyce et al. (1988) and Zegeer et al. (1987a), which recommended the multiplicative models over the linear models. The before‐and‐after study with control sites estimated accident reductions 1.40–2.06 times higher than those of the linear model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Benekohal, R. F., and Hashmi, A. M. (1990). “Accident savings from roadside improvements on two‐lane rural highways.” Report No. FHWA/IL/RC‐009, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
2.
Benekohal, R. F., and Lee, M. H. (1991). “Comparison of safety effects of roadside vs road improvements on two‐lane rural highways.” Transportation Research Record 1303, 1–13.
3.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters. Wiley & Son, New York, N.Y.
4.
Boyce, D. E., Hochmuth, J. J., Meneguzzer, C., and Mortimer, R. G. (1988). Cost‐effective 3R roadside safety policy for two‐lane rural highways. Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Ill.
5.
Cleveland, D. E., and Kitmura, R. (1978). “Macroscopic modeling of two‐lane rural roadside accidents.” Transp. Res. Record 681, 53–62.
6.
Cleveland, D. E., Kostyniuk, L. P., and Ting, K. (1984). “Geometric design element groups and high‐volume two‐lane rural highway safety.” Transp. Res. Record 960, 1–13.
7.
Council, F. M., Reinfurt, D. W., Campbell, B. J., Roediger, F. L., Carroll, C. L., Dutt, A. K., and Dunham, J. R. (1980). “Accident research manual.” Report No. FHWA/RD‐80/016, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
8.
Dotson, V. E. (1974). “An evaluation of the thirty foot clear zone.” Thesis presented to the University of Illinois, at Urbana, Ill., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
9.
Evaluation of accidents on two‐lane, rural trunk highways. (1980). Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, Minn.
10.
Foody, T. J., and Long, M. D. (1974). The identification of relationships between safety and roadway obstructions. Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio.
11.
Kohutek, T. L., and Ross, H. E., Jr. (1978). “Safety treatment of roadside culverts on low volume roads.” Report No. FHWA/TX77‐225‐1, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
12.
Maierle, M. J., and Wolfgram, M. J. (1988). Rural two‐lane highway accidents and geometrics: A statistical analysis. 67th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
13.
Ng, J. C. N., and Hauer, E. (1989). Accidents on rural two‐lane roads: Differences between seven states. 68th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
14.
Perchonok, K., Ranney, T. A., Baum, A. S., Morris, D. F., and Eppich, J. D. (1978). “Hazardous effects of highway features and roadside objects.” Vols. 1 and 2, Report Nos. FHWA‐RD‐78‐201 and FHWA‐RD‐78‐202, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
15.
Rogness, R. O., Fambro, D. B., and Turner, D. S. (1982). “Before‐after accident analysis for two shoulder upgrading alternatives.” Transp. Res. Record 855, 41–47.
16.
Tignor, S. C., Brinkman, C. P., Mason, J. M., and Mounce, J. M. (1982). “Synthesis of safety research related to traffic control and roadway elements.” Vol. 1, Report No. FHWA‐TS‐82‐232, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
17.
Transportation glossary. (1983). American Assoc. of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
18.
Zegeer, C. V., and Cynecki, M. J. (1984). “Determination of cost‐effective roadway treatments for utility pole accidents.” Transp. Res. Record 970;, 52–64.
19.
Zegeer, C. V., Hummer, J., Herf, L., Reinfurt, D., and Hunter, W. (1987a). “Safety cost‐effectiveness of incremental changes in cross‐section design—Informational guide.” Report No. FHWA/RD‐87/094, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
20.
Zegeer, C. V., Hummer, J., Reinfurt, D., Herf, L., and Hunter, W. (1987b). “Safety effects of cross‐section design for two‐lane roads.” Vols. 1 and 2, Reports No. FHWA‐RD‐87/008 and FHWA‐RD‐87/009, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
21.
Zegeer, C. V., and Parker, M. R. (1984). “Effect of traffic and roadway features on utility pole accidents.” Transp. Res. Record 970, 65–76.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 1 • January 1992
Pages: 111 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1992
Published in print: Jan 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.