Risk Evaluation on Low Water‐Crossing Structures
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 3
Abstract
Highway engineers occasionally face the dilemma of either constructing a regular high bridge so that traffic would not be interrupted by floods or using a low water-crossing structure so that traffic would be interrupted by floods at certain time intervals. The low water-crossing structure (LWCS) is usually much cheaper but has strong negative social and political impacts. A public-opinion survey was conducted and analyzed for the thoughts from various engineers from state highway departments, forest services, and other institutes on this issue. The most important intangible factors for the selection of LWCS were (in order of importance): possible damage to human life, amount of daily traffic, frequency of possible floodings, legal considerations, and the location as part of an emergency route. Availability of an alternate route, duration of traffic interruptions, and possible property damage form the second most important group. Certain absolute constraints were concluded from these questionnaires. A warning system is an important ingredient for the selection of LWCS also. Respondents overwhelmingly (more than 85%) indicated that they would be willing to consider changing their criteria for the selection of LWCS if a great majority (more than 75%) of other designers have criteria different from their own.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Corry, M. L., Jones, J. S., and Thompson, R. L. (1980). “The design of encroachments on flood plains using risk analysis.” Hydr. Engrg. Circular No. 17, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Federal Highway Admin., Washington, D.C.
2.
Haimes, Y. Y., and Hall, W. A. (1974). “Multiobjectives in water resources systems analysis: The surrogate worth trade off method.” Water Resour. Res., 10(4), 615–624.
3.
Leopold, L. B. (1969). “Quantitative comparison of some aesthetic factors among rivers.” USGS Circular 620, 16.
4.
Schneider, V. R., and Wilson, K. V. (1980). “Hydraulic design of bridges with risk analysis.” Report No. FHWA‐TS‐80‐226, Federal Highway Admin., U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C., Mar.
5.
Shen, H. W. (1981). “Opinion survey on low water crossing structures.” Report, Colorado State Univ., Engrg. Res. Ctr., Fort Collins, Colo.
6.
Sonnen, M. B., and Davis, L. C. (1979). “Wild rivers—Methods for evaluation.” Water Resour. Bulletin, 15(2), 404–419.
7.
Tseng, M. T., Knepp, A. J., and Schmalz, R. A. (1975). “Evaluation of flood risk factors in the design of highway stream crossings.” FHWA‐RD‐75‐54, Fed. Highway Admin., U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C., Jun.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1991
Published in print: May 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.