Synthetic Models for Through Trips in Small Urban Areas
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 5
Abstract
This research studied the accuracy of borrowed synthetic models for estimating through trips in small urban areas. Three sets of models—NCI, NC2, and KY, which were previously developed in North Carolina and Kentucky, were evaluated as a part of this study. All three models were essentially two‐stage models. The first stage estimated the number of through trip ends at each cordon station. The second stage distributed the through trip ends calculated in the first stage from each station to all other destination stations. The basic features of all the models were compared to bring out their similarities and differences. The models were then tested with the help of data obtained from 14 small urban areas in North Carolina. The trip end estimation models were tested on all the 14 urban areas, and the trip distribution models were tested on six of these urban areas. The estimated through trips were compared with the actual through trips obtained from origin‐destination (O‐D) surveys to assess the accuracy of the models. Additional analyses were performed to determine the sensitivity of functional classification for all three models, and the sensitivity of route continuity on the NC2 model. The accuracy of the models in predicting large volumes of through trips was found to be acceptable. It was concluded that the models are useful tools for quick estimation of through trip patterns in small urban areas.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bates, J. W. (1974). “Synthetic derivation of internal trips for small cities.” Transportation Research Record No. 526, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 93–103.
2.
Goode, L. R. (1977). “Evaluation of estimated vehicle trip productions and attractions in a small urban area.” Transportation Research Record No. 638, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 21–25.
3.
Grecco, W. L., et al. (1976). “Transportation planning for small urban areas.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 167, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
4.
Khasnabis, S., and Poole, M. R. (1975). “Synthesizing travel patterns for a small urban area.” Traffic Engrg., 28–30.
5.
Modlin, D. G. (1974). “Synthetic through trip patterns.” J. Transp. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 100(2), 363–378.
6.
Modlin, D. G. (1980). “Synthesized through trip table for small urban areas.” Technical Report No. 3, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, N.C.
7.
1968 national highway functional classification study manual. (1969). U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
8.
Pigman, J. P. (1978). “Simulation of external‐internal and through trips for small urban areas.” Division of Research, Kentucky Bureau of Highways, Lexington, Ky.
9.
Rhodes, D., and Hillegass, T. (1978). “Demonstration of a simplified traffic model for small urban area.” Transportation Research Record No. 677, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 76–81.
10.
Smith, R. L. (1978). “Examination of a simplified travel demand model.” J. Transp. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 104(1), 31–41.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1989
Published in print: Sep 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.