Technical Procedures for Interchange Justification
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 6
Abstract
Rapid land development and the lack of adequate local streets often results in requests for access to Interstate and other limited access highways. Gaining access to an Interstate highway is a highly valued asset and is aggressively pursued by local development interests. Land access demands compete with operational needs for acceptable traffic service and adversarial proceedings often result. Requests for additional access normally require investigation and preparation of technical justification studies and summary documents examining engineering, operational, and cost‐benefit factors. A major requirement for this process is a traffic study sufficient to show the impact of the proposed interchange upon current and future service levels of the mainline facility. Traffic investigations should show the impacts of major changes in land‐use surrounding the new interchanges. Established operational and geometric design policy for interchange spacing is important. Local planning requirements also affect the decision. This paper presents guidelines and procedures for the necessary studies and reports supporting a timely decision regarding the request.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Additional access requests—analysis and documentation requirements. (1987). Internal memorandum, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
2.
Development of regional impact application for development approval under section 380.06(6), Florida statutes. (1987). Dept. of Community Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla.
3.
Highway capacity manual. (1985). Special Report 209, Transp. Res. Board, Nat. Res. Council, Washington, D.C.
4.
Estimate of the cost of completing the Interstate system, instruction manual. (1986). Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transp. Washington, D.C.
5.
Manual of uniform standards for design, construction and maintenance for streets and highways. (1986). Florida Dept. of Transp., Tallahassee, Fla.
6.
A manual on user benefit analysis of highway and bus transit improvements. (1977). American Assoc. of State Highway and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
7.
McLeod, D. S., and Adair, R. E. (1980). “Benefit cost analysis based upon the 1977 AASHTO procedures.” Transp. Res. Record, 747, 43–49.
8.
Minimum criteria for review of local government comprehensive plans and determination of compliance. Rule 9J‐5. (1986). Florida Dept. of Community Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla.
9.
Policy on geometric design of highways and streets. (1984). American Assoc. of State Highway and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
10.
Transportation and traffic engineering handbook. (1982). 2nd. Ed. Inst. of Transp. Engrs., Washington, D.C.
11.
Transportation Policy, Rule 9J‐2.0255. (1987). Florida Dept. of Community Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1988
Published in print: Nov 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.