Comparison of German to Marston Design Methods
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 4
Abstract
In the United States and several other countries around the world, the Marston load theory is commonly used in computing the trench backfill loads on rigid pipes. Germany is using an alternative method developed by Abwassertechnischen Vereinigung e. V. (ATV) as the working design method for rigid and flexible pipe. This paper presents the German design method and a comparison of the two theories as they are applied to buried vitrified clay pipe design. The load ratio is defined as the ratio of the German load to Marston load. This ratio shows that the Marston theory is conservative for small pipes backfilled with well‐compacted granular material because it neglects the load relieving effect of the side fill and underestimates the friction between backfill soil and trench walls. The German design method is relatively simpler and could result in savings for vitrified clay pipe manufacture and design and for installation. The effects of the trench geometry, soil characteristics, the pipe diameter, and the stiffness ratio of bedding and backfill soils on the trench loads are studied in detail for both German and Marston methods of design. Results show that the load ratio depends significantly on the ratio of trench width to pipe diameter. This paper would be of great interest to engineers in pipeline practice in their attempts to evaluate design techniques used in other technologically competitive countries.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bulson, P. S. (1985). Buried structures—static and dynamic strength. Chapman and Hall, Ltd., London, U.K.
2.
Clarke, N. W. B. (1968). Buried pipelines. Maclaren and Sons, London, U.K.
3.
Clay pipe engineering manual. (1985). National Clay Pipe Institute, Washington, D.C.
4.
Concrete pipe handbook. (1981). American Concrete Pipe Association, Vienna, Va.
5.
Jeyapalan, J. K., and Jiang, N. (1986). “Load reduction factors for buried clay pipes.” J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 112(3), 230–249.
6.
Marston, A., and Anderson, A. C. (1913). “The theory of loads on pipes in ditches and tests of cement and clay drain tile and sewer pipe.” Bulletin 31, Iowa Engineering Experimental Station, Ames, Iowa.
7.
“Specifications for the structural design of wastewater drains and sewers.” (1984). Worksheet A127, Abwassertechnishen Vereinigung e.v. in conjunction with the Verband Komuunaler Stadtereinigungsbetriebe, Hamburg, West Germany.
8.
“Standard practice for installing vitrified clay pipe lines.” (1983). Annual hook of ASTM standards, Vol. 4.05, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa.
9.
Young, O. C., and Trott, J. J. (1984). Buried rigid pipes, structural design of pipelines, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, Ltd., London, U.K.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1988
Published in print: Jul 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.