Consistency in Design for Low‐Volume Rural Roads
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 5
Abstract
The 2,000,000 miles of low‐volume rural roads in the United States are different than the high‐volume roads and should be designed differently. Traffic volumes on them are low, averaging about 110 vehicles/day or about one vehicle entering a given mile from both ends every three minutes during peak hours. This contrasts with one vehicle every four seconds at capacity. Geometries on many of these roads have not changed since they were built in the 1920s and 1930s. Today, road improvements should be based on designs that are consistent and safe, but economical, because needs are great and funds are scarce. Present‐day design practices for high volume roads require that each of their features meet a stipulated design speed set by modern surfaces and vehicles. This practice does not fit the low‐volume situation since, whenever possible, drivers will exceed any affordable design speed. They must be slowed down when situations warrant it. A consistent approach to design which realizes cheap but safe improvements to low‐volume roads is proposed. It involves integrating geometric design and positive guidance approaches. Positive guidance employs striping, signing, and other devices and strategies to mobilize drivers' senses so that they will drive sensibly. Selecting the less costly between geometry and positive guidance techniques will produce safer roads more cheaply.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Agg, T. R., Construction of Roads and Pavements, 5th Ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y., 1940.
2.
American Association of State Highway Officials, Geometric Design Guide for Local Roads and Streets, 1969.
3.
American Association of State Highway Officials, Policies on Geometric Design, 1950.
4.
American Association of State Highway Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design, 1954.
5.
American Association of State Highway Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design, 1965.
6.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Geometric Design Guide for Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation (RRR) of Highways and Streets, 1977.
7.
Federal Highway Administration Report T0‐80‐1, “Evaluation of Traffic Operations, Safety, and Positive Guidance Projects,” Oct., 1980.
8.
Federal Highway Administration Report T0‐80‐2, “Planning and Field Data Collection,” (Volume II in a series on Positive Guidance), Dec., 1981.
9.
Federal Highway Administration Report T0‐81‐1, A User's Guide to Positive Guidance,” 2nd Ed., Dec., 1981.
10.
Jorgenson, Roy Associates, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 197, “Cost and Safety Effectiveness of Highway Design Elements,” 1978.
11.
Lunenfeld, H., and Alexander, G., Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 2, Mar., 1984, pp. 149–158.
12.
Oglesby, C. H., and Altenhofen, M. J., National Cooperative Highivay Research Program Report 63, “Economics of Design Standards for Low‐Volume Rural Roads,” 1969.
13.
Skinner, R. E., Jr., TRB News, (Published by the Transportation Board), No. 111, Mar.–Apr., 1984, pp. 16–19.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1985
Published in print: Sep 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.