Effective Width of Pedestrian Corridors
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 110, Issue 1
Abstract
Pedestrians walking in corridors tend to maintain a clearance from the walls and any stationary obstacles that they pass, thus, space within corridors is never fully utilized. A number of researchers have, therefore, suggested that an effective width reduction should be subtracted from the gross width to obtain an effective corridor width for design purposes. There are discrepancies, however, in the magnitudes of the effective width reductions that are suggested in the literature.
A proposed definition and method for calculating effective width reductions from pedestrian data is presented. Pedestrian distributions observed in a survey conducted in a pedestrian tunnel at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, were used to calculate effective width reductions under various conditions. The reductions calculated for walls ranged between 5.5 in. and 8.7 in. (140 mm and 220 mm). This is less than one‐third of the 18 in. (46 cm) suggested by most researchers. Experimentation with obstacles, such as a waste receptacle adjacent to one wall, resulted in even lower effective width reductions. It is concluded that effective width reductions generally assumed in current design practices are overestimated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
de Neufville, R., and Grillot, Design of Pedestrian Space in Airport Terminals, Jan., 1982.
2.
Department of Transport, Federal Aviation Administration, Apron and Building Planning Manual, Washington, D.C., July, 1975.
3.
Department of Transport, Federal Highway Administration, A Pedestrian Planning Procedures Manual—Vol. 2 Procedures, Washington, D.C., 1978.
4.
Diffrient, N., Tilley, A., and Bardagjy, J. C., Human Scale 1 2 3, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1974.
5.
Foot, N. I. S., “Police Rescue Hundreds of City Shoppers,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Apr.–June, 1973, pp. 162–167.
6.
Fruin, J. J., “Designing for Pedestrians, a Level of Service Concept,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Oct., 1980, pp. 162–167.
7.
Fruin, J. J., Pedestrian Planning and Design, Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners Inc., New York, 1971.
8.
Habicht, A. T., Effective Width of Walkways, Department of Civil Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Sept., 1982.
9.
Highway Research Board, Special Report 87, Highway Capacity Manual, Washington, D.C., 1975.
10.
Navin, F., and Wheeler, R. J., “Pedestrian Flow Characteristics,” Traffic Engineering, June, 1969, pp. 30–36.
11.
Pauls, J. L., “Building Evacuation: Research Findings and Recommendations,” Fires and Human Behaviour, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1980, pp. 251–274.
12.
Pushkarev and Zupan, Urban Space for Pedestrians, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.
13.
Trengenza, P., The Design of Interior Circulation, Granada Publishing Ltd., London, England, 1976.
14.
Weston, J. G., and Marshall, J., The Capacity of Passageway for Uni‐Directional and For Crossing Flows of Pedestrians, Department or Operational Research, London Transport Executive, Dec., 1972.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 110 • Issue 1 • January 1984
Pages: 80 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1984
Published in print: Jan 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.