Errors Introduced by Fluctuations in the Sampling Rate of Automatically Recording Instruments: Experimental and Theoretical Approach
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 3
Abstract
The sampling rate in automatically recording instruments is usually assumed stable. Small fluctuations in this rate have practically little influence on low recording rates, but they might be important in high rates for three reasons. First, they lead to wrong estimation of certain parameters, equations of motions, etc. Second, errors accumulate and become very important in certain cases, for instance, displacements deduced from double numerical integration in instruments such as the accelerographs. Finally, they lead to noisy or wrong spectral characteristics in periodic functions. Fluctuations in the sampling rate were studied on the basis of experiments with a robotic total station, the built-in software of which was configured to display time of recordings with centisec resolution. The conclusion of these experiments is that at high sampling rates, the signal-to-noise ratio decreases, introducing additional noise in final results. Such instabilities in the sampling rate are not easy to identify in most automatically recording instruments, but if modeled, they have the great advantage that they permit high-rate aliasing-free estimates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Discussions with M. Vrahatis on the errors-in-variables techniques are acknowledged.
References
Cosser, E., Roberts, G. W., Meng, X., and Dodson, A. H. (2003). “Measuring the dynamic deformation of bridges using a total station.” Proc., 11th FIG Symp. on Deformation Monitoring, 2003, http://www.fig.net/commission6/santorini/I-Monitoring%20Static%20and%20Dyn/I9.pdf (Oct. 10, 2007).
Davis, R., Foote, F., Anderson, J., and Mikhail, E. (1981). Surveying, theory and practice, 6th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Garber, S., and Klepper, S. (1980). “Extending the classical normal errors in-variables model (statistical techniques).” Econometrica, 48(6), 1541–1546.
Gikas, V., and Daskalakis, S. (2006). “Full scale validation of tracking total stations using a long stroke electrodynamic shaker.” Proc., XXIII FIG Congress Shaping the Change, http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2006/papers/ts24/ts24_02_gikas_daskalakis_0477.pdf (Oct. 10, 2007).
Guidorzi, R., Diversi, R., and Soverini, U. (2003). “Optimal errors-in-variables filtering.” Automatica, 39, 281–289.
Kijewski-Correa, T., Kareem, A., and Kochly, M. (2006). “Experimental verification and full-scale deployment of global positioning systems to monitor the dynamic response of tall buildings.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(8), 1242–1253.
Kochly, M., and Kijewski-Correa, T. (2006). “Experimental verification of a GPS network: Characterization and removal of multipath effects.” Proc. SPIE, 6174(2), 61742J.1–61742J.9.
Kopacik, A., Kyronovic, P., and Kadlecikova, V. (2005). “Laboratory tests of robot stations.” Proc., FIG Working Week 2005 from Pharaohs to Geoinformatics, http://www.fig.net/pub/cairo/papers/ts_22/ts22_08_kopacik_etal.pdf (Oct. 10, 2007).
Mikhail, E. (1976). Observations and least squares, IEP-A Dun-Donnelley Publisher, New York.
Pagiatakis, S. D. (1999). “Stochastic significance of peaks in the least-squares spectrum.” J. Geodesy, Berlin, 73, 67–78.
Parsopoulos, K. E., Laskari, E. C., and Vrahatis, M. N. (2001). “Solving L1-norm errors-in-variables problems using particle swarm optimizer.” Artificial intelligence and applications, M. H. Hamza, ed., I Asted/Acta Press, Anaheim, Calif., 185–190.
Proakis, J. G., and Manolakis, D. G. (1996). Digital signal processing, 3rd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Psimoulis, P., and Stiros, S. (2007). “Monitoring and spectral characteristics of flexible engineering structures using robotic theodolite (RTS).” Eng. Struct., 29(12), 3312–3324.
Pytharouli, S., and Stiros, S. (2008). “Spectral analysis of unevenly spaced or discontinuous data using the ‘normperiod’ code.” Comput. Struct., 86(1–2), 190–196.
Radovanovic, R. S., and Teskey, W. F. (2001). “Dynamic monitoring of deforming structures: GPS versus robotic tacheometry systems.” Proc., 10th FIG Symp. on Deformation Measurements, http://www.fig.net/com6_orange/index.htm (Oct. 10, 2007).
Rueger, M. (1990). Electronic distance measurement. An introduction, 3rd Ed., Springer, Berlin.
Söderström, T., Soverini, U., and Mahata, K. (2002). “Perspectives on errors-in-variables estimation for dynamic systems.” Signal Process., 82(8), 1139–1154.
Stiros, S. (2008). “Errors in velocities and displacements deduced from accelerographs: An approach based on the theory of error propagation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 28(5), 415–420.
Thomson, K. J., and Willis, K. G. (1986). “Errors in variables: A problem in regression and its solution.” Environment & Planning, A, 18(5), 687–693.
Wang, G. Q., Boore, D. M., Igel, H., and Zhou, X. Y. (2003). “Some observations on collocated and closely spaced strong ground-motion records of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(2), 674–693.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 134 • Issue 3 • August 2008
Pages: 89 - 93
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 22, 2007
Accepted: Jan 15, 2008
Published online: Aug 1, 2008
Published in print: Aug 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.