Assessment of Low-Cost GPS Receiver Accuracy and Precision in Forest Environments
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 4
Abstract
Selecting the appropriate receiver is an issue when a major portion of global positioning system (GPS) data collection is below forest canopies. This study compares four low-cost GPS receivers, in order to determine the most suitable receiver for position assessment under different forest canopy covers, in terms of ease of use, accuracy, and reliability. A total of 33 positional assessments were gathered per receiver, plot, and method, in 18 forest locations. Data were described and analyzed through a sample comparison analysis at 95% confidence level (Mann–Whitney nonparametric test), in order to determine the existence of differences in accuracy and precision in positioning between receivers. Results showed that there were significant differences between the receivers regarding accuracy and precision measuring coordinates; moreover, accuracies were different depending on the canopy cover and forest characteristics. Therefore, practical recommendations for each case were settled in order to help foresters to select the most suitable receiver. Moreover, key forest variables regarding GPS performance were identified, so that forest environments could be effectively clustered by them.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Elements of this project were funded by the University of León through Project No. UNSPECIFIEDULE-2006-1. The writers would like to thank Antonio Gavela for help in field work and the anonymous reviewers whose comments significantly improved this manuscript.
References
Avery, T. E., and Burkhart, H. E. (2002). Forest measurements, 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dana, P. H. (1999). “Global positioning system (GPS) time dissemination for real-time applications.” Real-Time Syst., 12(1), 9–40.
Diéguez Aranda, U., Barrio Anta, M., Castedo Dorado, F., Ruiz González, A. D., Álvarez Taboada, M. F., Álvarez González, J. G., and Rojo Alboreca, A. (2003). Dendrometría, Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, Spain.
Evans, D., Carraway, R., and Simmons, G. (1992). “Use of global positioning system (GPS) for forest plot location.” Southern J. Applied Forestry, 16(2), 67–70.
Hasegawa, H., and Yoshimura, T. (2003). “Application of dual-frequency GPS receivers for static surveying under tree canopies.” J. Forest Research, 8(2), 103–110.
Kaplan, E. D. (1996). Understanding GPS principles and applications, Artech House Inc., Boston.
Karsky, D., Chamberlain, K., Mancebo, S., Patterson, D., and Jasumback, T. (2000). “Comparison of GPS receivers under a forest canopy with selective availability off.” USDA Forest Service Project Rep. No. 7100, USDA Forest Service, Missoula, Mont., ⟨http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/htmlpubs/htm99712318/index.htm⟩ (Nov. 2, 2006).
McDonald, T. P., Carter, E. A., and Taylor, S. E. (2002). “Using the global positioning system to map disturbance patterns of forest harvesting machinery.” Canadian J. Forest Research, 32(2), 310–319.
Næsset, E. (1999). “Point accuracy of combined pseudorange and carrier phase differential GPS under forest canopy.” Canadian J. Forest Research, 29(5), 547–553.
Næsset, E. (2001). “Effects of differential single- and dual-frequency GPS and GLONASS observations on point accuracy under forest canopies.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 67(9), 1021–1026.
Næsset, E., Bjerke, T., Øvstedal, O., and Ryan, L. H. (2000). “Contributions of differential GPS and GLONASS observations to point accuracy under forest canopies.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 66(4), 403–407.
Næsset, E., and Jonmeister, T. (2002). “Assessing point accuracy of DGPS under forest canopy before data acquisition, in the field and after postprocessing.” Scandinavian J. Forest Research, 17(4), 351–358.
Norušis, M. J. (2005). SPSS 13.0 advanced statistical procedures, Prentice-Hall, Chicago.
Satirapod, C., Wang, J., and Rizos, C. (2003). “Comparing different global positioning system data processing techniques for modeling residual systematic errors.” J. Surv. Eng., 129(4), 129–135.
Sawaguchi, I., Nishida, K., Shishiuchi, M., and Tatsukawa, S. (2003). “Positioning precision and sampling number of DGPS under forest canopies.” J. Forest Research, 8(2), 133–137.
Sawaguchi, I., Saitoh, Y., and Tatsukawa, S. (2005). “A study of the effects of stems and canopies on the signal to noise ratio of GPS signals.” J. Forest Research, 10(5), 395–401.
Soler, T., Álvarez-García, G., Hernández-Navarro, A., and Foote, R. H. (1996). “GPS high accuracy geodetic networks in Mexico.” J. Surv. Eng., 122(2), 80–94.
Tachiki, Y., Yoshimura, T., Hasegawa, H., Mita, T., Sakai, T., and Nakamura, F. (2005). “Effects of polyline simplification of dynamic GPS data under forest canopy on area and perimeter estimations.” J. Forest Research, 10(6), 419–427.
Tiberius, C., and Kenselaar, F. (2003). “Variance component estimation and precise GPS positioning: Case study.” J. Surv. Eng., 129(1), 11–18.
West, P. W. (1983). “Comparison of stand density measures in even-aged regrowth eucalypt forest of southern Tasmania.” Canadian J. Forest Research, 13(1), 22–31.
Wing, M. G., and Bettinger, P. (2003). “GIS: An updated primer on a powerful management tool.” J. For., 101(4), 4–8.
Wing, M. G., and Kellogg, L. D. (2004). “Digital data collection and analysis techniques for forestry applications.” Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Geoinformatics, Univ. of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden, 77–83, ⟨http://www.hig.se/~bjg/geoinformatics/proceedings.html#77⟩ (September 10, 2006).
Yoshimura, T., Gandaseca, S., Gumus, S., and Acar, H. (2002). “Evaluating the accuracy of GPS positioning in the forest of the Macka region.” Proc., 2nd National Black Sea Forestry Congress, Artrin, Turkey, Vol. 1, 62–69, ⟨http://bg66.soc.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp/forestgps/doc/turkey.pdf⟩ (Nov. 6, 2006).
Yoshimura, T., and Hasegawa, H. (2003). “Comparing the precision and accuracy of GPS positioning in forested areas.” J. Forest Research, 8(3), 147–152.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 4 • November 2007
Pages: 159 - 167
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 14, 2006
Accepted: Mar 16, 2007
Published online: Nov 1, 2007
Published in print: Nov 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.